The Online Photographer

A couple of years ago, a small disaster took place. Or so I thought. I had issued a "call for work" for pictures themed around museums, to create one of our "Baker's Dozen" readers' pictures portfolios. As the pictures came in, I'd sneak glances at some of them on my phone or in passing. I have a very good visual memory, and many of the ones I sneaked a peek at, I remembered.

A while later, I got around to beginning to edit the portfolio—and discovered to my distress that a number of the submissions I remembered were missing.

I moved the rest to a different folder, for safeguarding, but I was mystified as to what happened to the others. I searched the inbox all kinds of ways but they didn't show up. I even went so far as to look through huge swaths of my inbox manually.

Every time I returned to the diminished group of submissions, I'd get sidetracked by feeling troubled about what I had somehow done wrong.

Part of this was sensitization. Periodically throughout my life I've suffered various disasters caused by my inability to stay organized. A new one reminds me of all the others, like a fresh wound that also opens old ones.

On Friday, I briefly put up two posts, one that apologized for never having completed the "In the Museum" set, the other that announced a new call for work. The first several responses were very critical of me, enough so that I took those two posts down again.

Once again I resolved to complete the original task, and once again I returned to the folder with the partial group of submissions in it. Then, almost absentmindedly, I went back to search the inbox again. But I periodically move old emails to an archive folder; by now, all the "BDMuseum" emails had been moved to the archive folder. So of course a search of the current inbox turned up nothing at all.

That's when the little light bulb above my head finally turned on.

I think what happened was that at some point after asking for the submissions, I moved a whole pile of emails to the archive folder, and the pile happened to include some of the earlier submissions. Then when I searched the inbox to begin the editing process, the ones I had moved were of course gone.

It just didn't occur to me what I had done, at the time.

This time, however, it took about three seconds for me to realize where they all were, once I tried searching the inbox. When I searched the archive folder for the keyword, "BDMuseum," there they all were—hundreds of submissions, including the ones I once thought I had lost.

Simple, once I figured it out. But it didn't occur to me two years ago.

Others
Clearly the idea of "In the Museum" resonated with you, because this was the largest group of submissions I've ever had to winnow down to 13. There were many more good ones than the ones I chose. "Honorable mentions" of pictures that almost made the cut include (but this is not a complete list): Jim Arthur, Yann Pouiol, Paul Braverman, John Dana, Don Seymour, Hans Berkout, Charles Rozier, Michael Wall, Tom Hassler, Richard Conolly, Carlos Quijano Altamirano, the four I mentioned in the post, Roy Feldman (I think I have a sort of sympatico with Roy's work because I always like his pictures), Max Cottrell, Siddhartha Chaudhuri, Jayanand Govindaraj, Martin E. Rich, Kyle Batson, John Bour, Barry Prager, Peter Barker, James Morauta, Nicolas Vincent, Ned Bunnell, Mike Bigalke, Phil Thomas, Bruce Reeve, and a good two dozen others. Lots of good stuff.

A touch of criticism: I noticed a fair number of the submissions had too much of an approximate, "snapshotty" quality, as if the photographer expected the subject to do a little too much of the work. Another fault was that a few of the pictures just didn't telegraph "museum" enough...they were taken at one, but might not have been.

Curiously, almost all of the submissions came from men. Maggie Osterberg, the lone woman chosen, no longer reads TOP (people do come and go—she was one of the ones who said goodbye). I hope the next Baker's Dozen call for work (coming up soon now, that is if I haven't "cried wolf" with this one) will inspire more participation from the women among our readers.

Anyway, it stretched my editing skills. It was difficult to bring a single set into focus. Catch me on a different day, and I'll bet some of my selections might have been different.

Shadow
In retrospect I'm actually grateful for those harsh comments on Friday that shamed me into attempting the task yet again. If that hadn't happened I might still not know how I screwed up two years ago.

Anyway, this sets a record for the longest interval between intention and result in TOP's existence, and I hope 856 days is a record that will never be broken. Again, I apologize for the SNAFU. My screwups don't often end happily, so I'm glad this one did.

Happy ending or not, I'm glad this is over and put to bed at long last so we can move on. The past has too much of a hold on me; it often casts too much of a shadow on the future, and that's no good.

And if you haven't seen it yet, scroll down to the next post and see "In the Museum"!

Mike

Product o' the Week:

Fingertip Pulse Oximeter. The link is from TOP to Amazon. This relates to health, not photography—it replaces one of the advanced functions on the latest Apple Watch. Takes your pulse and measures your blood oxygen. For heart monitoring, checking for COVID (low blood oxygen is an early warning sign) and slow heartbeat. I'm learning to correlate the way I feel with the readings. Works with iOS and Android. Nifty little device, super easy to use, and cheap.

Original contents copyright 2020 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Very unfortunately, I have to take a few more days off. I hate to interrupt the conversation and I apologize sincerely. Family business to attend to, unavoidable. I have to say, this has been a difficult Summer.

Back Friday, and "miles to go before I sleep."

—Mike

P.S. If you ever have to bring caregivers and other workers into the houses of older relatives, secure the valuables before outsiders so much as set foot in the house. Lock up the jewelry and, if you can't put the valuables under literal lock and key, at least itemize and photograph everything. And do both at the earliest possible opportunity, for otherwise there's never a time.

Original contents copyright 2021 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Michael Cytrynowicz: "Oh s**t sorry to hear Mike."

Peter Williams: "That seems like a s**t attitude to and generalisation about caregivers and other workers."

Mike replies: Hmm, good point, and I'm sorry. Caregivers are among the blessed of the Earth: the good, responsible ones are doing work that benefits human beings as well as the human family as a whole. On the other hand, in every barrel of people there are a few bad ones that diminish the rest. In the news recently we have watched that with police officers, in people like Michael Slager and Derek Chauvin, but a large number of police officers are upright individuals who sincerely serve their communities and do a good job. In like fashion, what is likely a very small number of caregivers, those who neglect, abuse, or steal, stink up the air for the rest.

Maybe I should have worded it better: if you don't sensibly secure your elders' valuables from the start of their decline, you have no one to blame but yourself.

Alan Ampolsk: "About your PS? Amen! One of the many notable episodes during my father's Alzheimer's was the home health aide who lifted one of his credit cards, which we hadn't properly secured, and used it to pay her cell phone bill—which resulted in her name appearing on the credit card statement. There is no such thing as a criminal mastermind. Nevertheless—be careful out there."

So I hope you can bear with me on the stuff about watches. For some reason I can't imagine people not being interested in pool, but I can absolutely "get it" that a lot of people are just totally uninterested in watches. Heck, I myself was totally uninterested in watches barely more than a month ago. I have to say, though, I'm curiously happy to be back wearing one after all these years.

I mean, how can anybody not be interested in pool? It's a sport. Can't pretty much anyone watch any particular sport with at least a little interest? I can watch high diving, snowboarding, dog agility contests, soccer, even poker. I mean I don't go out of my way. I guess there are a few sports I won't watch...back in Wisconsin, fishing shows seemed popular. I have no problem conceiving that some people are interested in fishing, but I really don't need to watch it on TV. (What's the weirdest sport [or game or recreation] you'll watch on TV?) When I was young I thought golf was about as exciting as watching grass grow, but then for a few years there I would stare at the TV screen like I was hypnotized. Or hyp-mo-tized, as David Letterman used to say. I guess bowling would make me change the channel, but I have a buddy locally—Kurt, who owns the town bowling alley—who travels to tournaments. To compete, not just to watch. He'll play pool with us, but to get his eyes to really light up, bring up bowling.

Anyway, about the watches: it'll pass, and I'll try my best to go easy on it. You know me. I get these enthusiasms. But 40% is a pretty big number...

Here's a very rough breakdown: of American adults, 20% wear smartwatches; 20% are into traditional watches (both quartz and mechanical, which are lumped together now); 20% own both; and 40% don't own or wear a watch.

TOP's audience is thought to skew older now (the Commentariat seems to) but, curiously, older people are more likely to fall into the "no watch" group. Apparently a lot of the over-60 crowd remembers pain-in-the-butt hand-wound watches that were only accurate to the nearest five minutes and were always stopping at inconvenient times because we forgot to wind them (my hand is raised here). Most of us are more than happy to have the time on the phones we're carrying anyway, accurate to within a fraction of a second always. With zero care and feeding. Heck, my best watch syncs to my phone, four times a day. And some retirees go out of their way to banish the tyranny of the clock from their lives and not be a slave!

Anyway, nobody comes here to read about watches. And the real watch guys here have no need to listen to a blithering wet-behind-the-ears greenhorn newbie like me. And a quartz snob at that. Like I say, I'll try to go easy, and I hope you'll indulge me....

Mike

Product o' the Week:

Ringlight for Zoom, Facetime, vlogging, streaming, video recording, remote working or remote learning. Holds a phone, or you can set it behind and above a desktop computer with a built-in camera. The following image is also a link: 

Original contents copyright 2021 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

John Camp: "As for sports, I honestly believe you have to ingest illegal drugs before you can appreciate synchronized swimming. The sport might very well be interesting to the athletes, but for spectating...acid may be the only answer. Or mushrooms."

Mike replies: Made me laugh. I was going to use synchronized swimming as an example but I couldn't remember what it was called!

AN: "I've gradually realized that for me, watching sports on TV has more or less the same kind of appeal as watching a soap opera. If I know something about the specific teams/players/coaches and their history, then I am interested. If I don't know any 'backstory,' then it doesn't matter what sport they are playing; I'm not engaged. It doesn't even particularly seem to matter how well I understand the rules or strategies of the sport being played (the announcers/fan reaction will tell me enough to follow along). So: if you want to get me excited about your pool articles, you know what you have to do."

Mike replies: You have thrown down the gauntlet! (...He says, as other readers groan.)

Dan Doviddio: Fountain pens can be another rabbit hole hobby. I am surprised how popular they are. I've acquired four since the pandemic.

Mike thinks to himself: No fountain pens...no fountain pens...no fountain pens....

Caleb Courteau: "By pure chance you and I became interested in watches at the same time, so of course I’m gobbling up your posts about watches. They really are a perfect third hobby. Unlike a camera they’re not begging to be used. If a camera isn’t producing photos it’s a bit of a pointless object, but a watch’s purpose is being carried out whether it’s on your wrist or your nightstand. They take up very little space, and as you pointed out, you can spend as much or as little as you desire. Furthermore, if it’s the shopping for watches that you enjoy most, and less the actual watches themselves, there is an endless supply of novelty within the world of watches. Different, straps, dials, movements, and case materials. There’s dozens of manufacturers, many of them with origins going back more than a century, making it easy to lose yourself in the history of watchmaking, if that’s your thing."

TOP will be taking time off for a few days...for a selfish reason. My son Xander, his girlfriend Alyssa, and their little doggie Ziggy drove 750 miles (1,207 km) to come visit. It's been so long since I've seen Xander—usually we see each at least once a year, but with the pandemic and all, it's been since June 2019, and longer than that since Alyssa was here last.

Ziggy doing "the Captain's stare." The Captain's stare was a standard portrait pose in days of yore, used to make a subject look stalwart, visionary, and intrepid. Check! Note Ziggy's cool bling.

I can't tell you how good it is to see them—I guess if you're a parent you'll know the feeling. I really needed this visit, with all that's been going on in the family lately. Just such a pleasure.

They're both in school, so they'll be leaving again early Friday morning. I'll sit down and get to work after I wave goodbye. So I'll see you on Friday! And best regards as well as best of luck for your own Summer 2021 vacation...I hope it goes (or went) well.

Mike

I've just finished loading whole bunches of new comments to each of the last four posts.

They are fantastic and I invite you to delve!

I've also written a few lengthy replies.

There are still a couple of wonderful or touching long comments that you will not find published, but later today I intend to contact the writers and ask for permission to post them as separate self-contained posts. (I do that infrequently, but regularly.)

I think it's just going to be a fact of life from now on that sometimes I'm going to get behind in the comments. Not only am I getting slower at writing and editing than I was when I started this blog when I was in my 40s, but I'm getting slower at everything else in my life as well! Which also cuts into work time. Anyway, I do apologize that these won't be posted sooner. I did start to enlist some volunteers to help moderate comments, but then I lost track of where we were and what I needed to do and fell prey again to my disorganized state of mind, and so that is yet another thing I neglected to finish...sigh....

Enjoy! And Happy Sunday. I hope you are well. Take pictures of your loved ones, and get pictures of yourself with them.

Mike

So this is kind of funny. When I started writing the "Why A Watch" post the other day, I actually started out intending to write about the Sony A6600. I was going to confess that I really want a Sony A6600, but that the desire makes no sense because I have no more need for it than I have for a wristwatch. I was going to explain that I had kinda gotten interested in wristwatches in spite of myself, despite the fact that I had no need for one whatsoever and no intention whatsoever of buying one. I was going to say that the same thing was true of the A6600. So the part about the watches was just going to be "introductory matter" you might say. After that I was going to discuss why we get GAS in the absence of need.

So then I got into doing a little more research on wristwatches and before you know it...off to the races. Pretty soon I realized the stuff about the A6600 was superfluous, so I just chopped it out and concentrated on the parts about watches. Three posts later and here I am, $157 poorer and with a Seiko on my wrist for the first time in decades.

Such is the life o' Mike...(shaking head in wonderment...). I had fun though!

Mike

P.S. No link to the A6600 here. The reason is that the price has been ping-ponging between $1,200 and $1,400 lately and it's at $1,400 right now. Should you want one, wait.

Product o' the Week:

The Apple Watch Series 6. This is a portal to Amazon from TOP.

The following image is also a link. You support TOP by buying through these portals.

Original contents copyright 2021 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Steve Deutsche: "How can I want one without your review!  8^)  "

Bernd Reinhardt: "Hahaha, let me share my watch lust origin story. About twenty years ago, my friend from Germany came to visit me in Los Angeles, and during a visit to Chinatown, he bought himself a fake Rolex. When he visited again a year later, we were sitting at the table and I was looking at his Rolex submariner. 'Oh, is this your Chinatown Rolex?' He had this little smirk on his face, and it dawned on me that this must be the real thing. 'Why would you spend that kind of money on some Grandpa-style watch?' I screamed. He laughed and said that after wearing the fake for several months, he discovered a tiny bit of rust on it. He became so frustrated and embarrassed that he drove down to Switzerland and bought the real thing that same day. I took a closer look at it and he pointed out how smooth the sweeping second hand glides over the watch face, and from that day on, I started dreaming of nice watches.

"There is very little that we actually need, but there is nothing wrong with getting something just because you really want it every now and again."

James: "Re ...'that the desire makes no sense because I have no more need for it than I have for a wristwatch'.... YOU LIKE NICE THINGS—WE ALL DO."

James Allen: "It was certainly entertaining to 'ride along' on your mental watch quest. I have been wearing one since I was a kid...which was about 5+ decades ago. So I feel the kinship. I work with a few younger guys now, and I'm the only one wearing a watch. It's my badge of life's experiences, all in one tiny, precise, piece of hardware. I even have to change the date when the month only has 30 days vs. 31, and yet it remains. It anchors me to the past as it tolls the passage of my life."

I have an important question for regular readers. Say a guest author wrote a post on TOP a number of years ago, and you left a comment. Now, he wants to republish the same post on his own website. He feels your comment is valuable and also wants to include that. He's leaving it in the same context in which it was written and the original source will be noted, and let's stipulate that the new location will be a courteous and decent public website, nothing fringey or dark. Assuming he cannot ask your permission directly, would you have any objection to him exporting your comment and republishing it? Would you feel your rights had been trampled, that you had been taken advantage of, or even that his actions were merely somewhat impolite to you? Would you feel uncomfortable about it in any way?

Please do speak up even if your objections are minor, as I'm trying to take the temperature of the readership as a whole. 

Thanks!

Mike

P.S. Comments to this post will not be published until this evening or tomorrow, as I don't want the responses of others to influence anyone who is responding.

Just an advance warning that I'll be away for a few days next week due to a family emergency. Family tragedy is more accurate. I'll leave links to some gems from the past to keep you occupied while I'm away, and I humbly ask your forbearance.

One of the problems of blogs is that they can't stop. When this type of website was more popular—they went from cutting edge to old fashioned in 20 years—I could be away for a week and it wouldn't affect traffic even during the time I was gone. Now, if I went silent for a week it would be at my great peril; my numbers would take a permanent hit. In AA they call that "life on life's terms" (i.e., that's the way it is), and the proper stance toward it "acceptance" (it is what it is).

Mike

Two brief notes: When Bill T., TOP's unofficial and occasional but still highly valued proofreader (thanks Bill!), alerted me to some formatting errors in the "Official Check" post, I opened it to find all sorts of wayward gobbledegook in the HTML. The assistant editor does not know how that got there. It should be set right now; but I was away from the computer for quite a while yesterday and I wanted to apologize for leaving the undies out on the clothesline while I was gone. I'll get on the assistant editor's case about it. He's a distractable scalawag.

Second, I'm due for a series of medical appointments in the week upcoming. Here in the sparsely-peopled interior of Western New York State we're obliged to drive all over L and gone for such things, so the Chief Writer and Bottlewasher's (not to mention the assistant editor's) hands could seem a little too light on the controls in the upcoming week. Apologies in advance if you get the feeling here and there that there isn't anyone manning the barricades.

Mike

If you don't mind I'll close the comments to this post since these are just announcements.

I have mice. I've trapped two of the little buggers upstairs, but they leave telltale feces when they eat anything so you can tell if they've been there. It's a minor problem but I know they're there. I'm going to wait till the weather is warm to trap the little buggers and drive them out to the country. I know I'm being sentimental, but I have to be humane with anything that cute.

The computer kind
Oddly, I'm having another persistent mouse problem...with my computer mouses. (The plural of a flesh-and-bone mouse is mice, but I think if you have three computer mouses in the houses—er, house—it's just an object called a mouse and more than one is mouses. No?) 

My bluetooth mouses stopped working with my Mac Mini—that is, stopped being Magic (the name is the "Magic Mouse II," for those of you outside the Appleverse)—so I switched back to the old Mighty Mouses with the scroll wheels, buying them used off eBay. But I'm on my second one and the scroll wheel has gone all intermittent on me. It works, but it's surly and sullen.

Wasn't this a solved problem at some point? For, like, decades? Didn't computer mouses work reliably for years and years? Also, Lord, why me?

I'm really tired of trying to work while not being able to responsively move the cursor around the computer screen. It's like trying to work with (searches decaying brain for analogy) someone gently tapping you on the head with a twig. It's not annoying once, or twenty times, but all day every day and it'll drive you insane. Same principle as what used to be called the Chinese Water Torture. Drip, drip, drip.

Anyway, too much preamble. Can anyone confidently recommend a good, high-quality, reliable third-party left-handed wired mouse?

Equipment!
Meanwhile, Microsoft has discontinued the funky split keyboard I've been using for years and years and years and years. You can still buy the odd new one here and there, but for inflated prices. This might not seem like a crisis to you, but I have a very idiosyncratic way of typing and I don't get along well with normal keyboards. Even if I were able to find another Microsoft 4000, it wouldn't matter, because they don't last—I've been through more than a dozen of them over the years. The failure point: the letters wear off the keys. That's either a flagrant design failure or transparent planned obsolescence, and either way it's exasperating.

Yikes. Equipment!

All this actually does relate to photography quite well. Over the years I've heard many stories of people who depended on certain products reaching this same sort of crisis point when their materials were discontinued. It's not just that we get used to a certain way of working. It's that we acquire mastery that suddenly becomes useless. We invest time and work in our expertise with the materials. It's often easy to adapt to new equipment and materials, and sometimes we even do it on purpose as a way of revitalizing our engagement; but in other cases it's a loss. Even Ansel Adams, the great technician, was unhappy with the photo papers he was able to get at the end of his life. They didn't respond like the ones he was used to. The extreme example was Frederick Evans, who quit photography altogether when he could no longer get the Pt/Pd papers his work depended on.

Constant progress and improvement in cameras, software, and printers these days is usually accepted as being a good thing, and it mostly is, but what some artist-craftspeople need is just to settle in with what they're used to and be able to depend on that. The deep expertise that accumulates with time and practice can be difficult to sustain when the ground is always shifting. I suppose some of you have enough talent with tech that this never comes up, but if so then I'm slower than you.

I'll be spending time today researching keyboards. Yeesh.

Mike

Book o' This Week:

André Kertész, On Reading, the lovingly crafted reprint of the lyrical 1971 classic by an early master of the small camera. (Would make an excellent Valentine, for a person who reads.) The above link will take you to Amazon. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Original contents copyright 2020 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Mike: "I worked for Apple for years doing support and found continual issues with bluetooth mice was often caused by other bluetooth mice in the house, including one where the customer remembered an old one stored in the basement. He went and tracked it down, removed the battery or turned it off, issue resolved. The issues can show up as continual or intermittent as the Mac connects back and forth to the different mice. Bluetooth range can be farther than you might expect.

"Not saying this is for sure your issue, but Apple products tend to be more robust than the string of failures you seem to be experiencing."

Mike replies: Hmm, that sounds like a real possibility. I got an iMac for upstairs and I don't think I had the problems before that. Plus, the problem sometimes happened upstairs as well, which mystified me but which your idea explains. I wonder if I was turning off the computers upstairs and down but leaving the mouses (mice) turned on, causing each computer to get confused.

I'll experiment with that. Thanks.

Thanks to everyone for all the suggestions. I've been checking out a lot of them throughout the day. Also, it appears that I was more or less wrong about the keyboard: Microsoft has discontinued the old 4000, but is making a new redesigned version called the Microsoft Ergonomic Keyboard.

Stephen Scharf wrote: "No mention of the new GFX100S? No. 1 Best Seller at B&H at present...."

There's a very old joke from way back in the days of the Model T Ford. I'm sure you've heard it before. Man takes his car to the mechanic. Describes his trouble. Mechanic looks under the hood, takes a hammer, and give the engine a whack. Starts the car, and it purrs like a kitten.

"That'll be fifty cents," he says.

"What! Fifty cents? All you did was give it one blow with your hammer. That seems an awful lot of money for such a simple thing!"

"Oh, the hammerin' was free," answers the mechanic. "It was knowin' where to hit it what cost the fifty cents."

Anyway...it's easy to write. The hard part is knowing what to say.

I'm a-workin' on it!

Mike

Book o' This Week:

Eyes Over the World: The Most Spectacular Drone Photography, by Dirk Dallas. The above link will take you to Amazon.

Original contents copyright 2020 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

I need some help. I've been putting links to relevant books at the end of posts recently. This week I meant to feature a book about drone or aerial photography, but I didn't noticed in time that the one I had picked is out of print and expensive now. Trying to research a replacement I get a little stuck. I've found good books of aerial photography done from helicopters and of course airplanes, and a few of satellite photos. But I'd rather pick up the theme of drones we've been visiting lately. Does anyone know of a good solid book about drone photography or of drone photographs? A book you've actually seen or that you own, rather than just something you've found online?

I can just pick a different book but I figured I'd give this a try first. TIA,

Mike

Book o' Last Week (new one coming up):

Peter Lindbergh On Fashion Photography, with text in English, French, and German. Original coffee table version or small 40th Anniversary version, take your pick. Both are hardcovers. The links above will whisk you away to Amazon.

TOP is on hiatus this week.

If you're looking for something to keep you occupied till our slacker Editor gets back, check out the completely and almost unprecedentedly awesome New York Times "2020 in Photos: A Year Like No Other."

This is no rote "as-usual" end-of-year feature, no casual feel-good eye-candy. It contains a much larger number of photographs than usual, arranged by month, with excellent captions, often calling out and describing the work of specific photographers for their accomplishment and risk-taking. This is a photojournalistic and editorial accomplishment in and of itself, on its own.

I've been there three times already and I'm only up to May.

This one will reward your attention. Highly recommended.

The view from the red chair, just now

See you soon!

—Slacker Editor, enjoying his break

P.S. See the update in the pool table post...

Book of interest this week:

The Secret Lives of Color by Kassia St Clair
(clicking on the links above takes you to Amazon)

From The Book Depository (free shipping worldwide)

About the book link at the bottom of the post: I thought in 2021 I would resurrect my onetime practice of putting a link to a relevant, recommended, or intriguing book at the end of every post—perhaps one mentioned in a recent post, perhaps not; perhaps one I've seen, perhaps one I've only heard of. If the feature provides a convenient jump to Amazon for TOP readers, so much the better.

Because not everyone can see the image links on my site, I'll include both an image and a text link, plus a link the to book at The Book Depository, which offers free international shipping worldwide. I'll keep each link up for about a week.

Give this a few weeks then I'll ask you what you think of it.

I'll venture a guess Elements, due soon on January 5th, might sell out quickly. Voyeuristic voyaging to the corners of the earth for those stuck isolating.

Mike

Original contents copyright 2020 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Book of interest this week:

Elements: In Pursuit of the Wild, Rucksack magazine
(clicking on the links above takes you to Amazon)

Elements from The Book Depository (free shipping worldwide)

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

No featured comments yet: please check back soon!

Item: Dang, I missed our birthday! The Online Photographer turned 15 a few weeks ago, on November 22nd. When I started this in 2005, my ambition was to try to keep it going for ONE WHOLE YEAR. That goal seemed unlikely. And here we are, 15 years (and a few days) later, still spluttering along. Pretty amazing. It's like starting an OC/OL/OY with dubious prospects, entirely unsure if you can make it, and then finding yourself still shooting with that same camera and lens fifteen years later.

Item: We had a lovely snowfall last night. Nine inches where I am, a medium powder.

Item: I'm going to be taking Christmas week off this year (I normally take three days). I'll be gone starting Mon. Dec. 22 and return on Sunday Dec. 27th. Hopefully before I go I'll post some links to some gems from the archives for those who want to go exploring.

Item: Two days from now, on Saturday, it will be the one-year anniversary of my latest diet experiment, and I'll post an update. During the past year I've been practicing time-restricted eating, plus I've been following a mainly plant-based diet. I'm trying to keep the size of the post down to something less than book-length! It's been an interesting experiment.

Item: I believe the recent "What Do You Shoot With These Days?" post received the second-highest number of comments in TOP's now 15-year history: 293 as of this morning. The all-time record is 701 comments, and it was to a question very similar to this one back in 2014—I asked about "Your Favorite Digital Camera." The Nikon D700 won the contest at that time.

Item: We didn't have any Print Sales this year, turns out. An idea for the next one is a-stirring in my brain. I have something a little different in mind. Because the last few sales have sold between 50 and 100 prints, I thought I'd collect a limited number of prints from each of several photographers, get them all boxed up and ready to go in advance, then offer them to you, first come first served. There are reasons for such a plan, one of which is that it sounds like fun to me.

As ever, I shall keep you posted.

Mike

Original contents copyright 2020 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:

Jay Salisbury: "I’ve been here for all those years though I never comment. Have enjoyed your blog even though I’m not even real serious about photography anymore. Anyway, just wanted to say thanks!"

Mike replies: Well, I'm glad you finally spoke up! And you are welcome.

Roger Bradbury: "Happy birthday, TOP man! I think I started here about fourteen years ago, and have been chipping in with comments ever since. Since I enjoyed the blog so much, early on I went back right to the beginning and went through all your old posts; first on the old site, then here. It's a nice place to be, which is why I keep coming back."

Caleb Courteau: "I forget how I found you Mike. I think it may have been through the Sunday Morning Photographer at the Luminous Landscape. I was in my early twenties then and am now thirty-five years old. At this point reading your writing has been a part of my weekly routine for a large fraction of my life. Jobs, girlfriends, and cameras have come and gone while reading your blog. I bought my first house, got married, and started a new career, but The Online Photographer has been a steady companion throughout."

Mike replies: That's humbling, Caleb, thank you. I'm honored!