<|-- removed generator --> The Online Photographer: The Camera Dork

« The Mighty Nikon Z8 | Main | Music Note »

Saturday, 29 July 2023

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It's about the same size as a Nikon F5, of which I sometimes carried two at a time. (It's a hair shorter and less wide, a hair thicker. It's also a bit lighter than an F5.) I'd actually feel less dorky with a Z9 than with a Z8, because the Z9 is so ugly that it's obviously a *tool,* rather than a wannabe extravagance. But, when it comes to actual photography, as opposed to the way you feel about your camera, I don't know why anyone would buy a Z9 rather than a Z8 or Z7II. I really like Nikons, and have been a Nikon user most of my life, but lately have been carrying a Fuji X-T5. Still have a couple of Z cameras, but the lenses are so large that they're just less fun to work with. (The lenses are large, but I have to say, they're also terrific.)

When I first got an SLR, I got a bag that would hold it and several lenses. And what I learned from that is that I hate changing lenses in the field. I absolutely hate it. It’s far better to go out with a single lens and get the shots I can get than to lug all that around.

I think the Z9 looks sleek compared to your monochrome rig! I’ll stick with my never-noticed M10 Monochrom, with a form factor almost identical to your M6. Have you tried the loaner M Monochrom (not quite as sleek or quiet) yet?

In 2008 I attended a small town hot rod show here in California with my Nikon D100. I was approached by a guy a bit older than I who asked for help with his camera. He had a brand new Nikon D1 with a giant wide angle zoom hanging around his neck. While I figured out how to set up the camera to be as automatic as possible, he told me he had just retired, decided to take up photography and went to the local camera store (we still had them then). They sent him away with the most expensive Nikon camera and lenses in the store and only a quick help session. I programmed the D1 to be as automatic as possible and sent him on his way. Perhaps that is one way many people get overloaded with camera gear.
The car show was fun too - 2008 web page.
http://jimhayes.com/photo/Cars/fallbrook2008/index.html

It would be interesting to hear from your readers the ratio of pictures taken with their phone to the number of pictures taken with a camera.

I'll start. So far today I've taken 61 pictures with my phone and shared ("published") five of those. I've taken none with my "real" camera. These are for me and sharing with friends and family.

Tomorrow I'm photographing an event which usually means one or two hundred pictures with my "real" camera and I expect that 20 or 30 of those will be shared with the event coordinator for publication (on-line/social media, magazine etc). In addition I will take about half the "real" camera number using my phone.

I love street photography with my Panny GX7 and 20mm 1.7 lens. Totally innocuous and people think it's a Leica once they see it.

"...my trusty Leica M6 and 35mm Summicron, ... It didn't get a single look—might as well have been invisible..."

Today, carrying an M6 with a small Summicron might have some envious millennial come up and ask how you were lucky enough to find a Fujifilm X100V.😉

Can you post your Niki Lauda picture please?

[I could, but I would have to go find it first. And that could take a whole afternoon. I have more pictures around this place than a junkie has troubles. --Mike]

"Oddly, the situation can be reversed if you're a professional. You want your equipment to say "I can do anything" and "I'm well equipped."

This makes me recall your story about Jane Bown in December 2014. Some of the best photographers are not particularly interested in equipment.

One of my first experiences with the “camera dork” was a VHS video that came with a camera I bought when I was around 20. It featured a classic camera dork (floppy hat, beard, big glasses, vest full of pockets) telling the viewer all about the “essential equipment” that every serious photographer needs. He then proceeded to pull all that stuff out of his bag to show the item and in some cases demonstrate usage. It was a bit like a magician’s bag in that it seemed impossible that so much stuff could fit in there, including every conceivable prime lens (24mm, 28mm, 35mm, fast 35mm, 50mm, fast 50mm, macro 50mm, 135mm) plus a series of zooms (28-50, 35-70, 70-300, etc.). All that in one bag! And the implication was that we all needed all of that stuff. Nope!

I believe the phrase you’re looking for here is ‘All the gear, no idea’.

Maybe some of the people who appear to have over bought during the film era and early days of digital wanted a specific feature that wasn't available in less expensive bodies. In the old days, relatively low-cost cameras, that is models not considered pro-level, used to come with mirror lock-up – the Minolta SRT 101, for example. Some of the mid-range Nikon bodies had this feature, also. Maybe if I had gotten an F3HP in 1985, I would have never bought another body, but in 2002 when I was ready to upgrade to a body with MLU, autofocus, and good eye relief, the F5 seemed like the obvious choice.

I have NOT used a "real" camera recently. Since I got my IPhone Xs I stopped using a "real" camera. Now I have no reason to carry a hated camera bag. Or change leaves.

As Terry Richdson once said all my clients have better cameras than I do. That didn't stop him from making a lot money with his snapshot style.

My fascination is why so many people take a flash when traveling, or indeed a large tripod, when available light photography is so easy with high ISO sensitivities. There are reasons to take a tripod and a flash, but in the Arizona desert in full sun, or traipsing through Florence these are generally not necessary. People say they want to maximize quality. Shoot at 400 ISO with IBIS and you will match a tripod. Use a flash to make a lousy picture of your family that looks like it was taken by an old Instamatic. Why? In my opinion these are a complete waste of space and may lead to a disgust with the whole process. These tools have a use, but when I see normal tourists with them I always wonder who told them this was the way to go.

I remember, after several years of discrete shooting with a Leica rangefinder, I purchased a Nikon Z6 and the 50mm f1.8 lens (wanted to try out the "new" mirrorless Nikon). Pretty basic kit with no giant zoom lens, but everywhere I went, I had the feeling of people seeing my camera before they saw me. Way too many "oh, he's got a camera" looks too many times. I was uncomfortable with that camera, so I sold it.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Portals




Stats


Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2007