There are all types of dorks, dweebs, nerds, weenies, geeks, and et cetera. There's little point in untangling all the definitions, even if only humorously.
But what I meant by "I'd feel like a dork" yesterday was one particular situation that personally makes me feel dorky. I would define that as being "ostentatiously over-equipped."
Bunny hill
When I was a kid, my family went on a ski vacation. I think the resort was Waterville Valley in New Hampshire, but I'm not positive now. In the locker room, getting our gear on—I had only gone skiing a couple of times before—there was a family that seemed to be "in the know." The father was talking loudly about the fine points of all the expensive equipment they had. (We were renting skis and boots, and were wearing our regular winter coats, which were not ski jackets.) They had all the latest everything. The man talked at length about all the virtues of his choice of skis (either K2 or Rossignol—one of those two he liked, the other one he didn't.) I have a picture in my head of the man in his mostly white ski suit. I thought, wow, these people are real skiers. They really know what it's all about.
At the time—and I hope I'm remembering the right resort—the first step to the ski lifts to all the runs was the bunny hill lift. Everyone went up that before either getting off there or continuing to the higher parts of the mountain. Well, I happened to find myself behind that dazzlingly well-outfitted family on the first lift, and assumed they would leave me behind when I got off at the first stop. But no. They all started down again from the top of the bunny hill! None of them could ski. Even the braggart father of the group didn't know what he was doing at all.
Later in the week, I encountered my friend Jeff K. at the lift, and we rode up together. I had met Jeff on the Freshman Week Outing Club trip at Dartmouth. He told me he'd been skiing since he was little; he was a member of the ski team and had won races all over New England. I said "must be nice to be that good at something," and he told me in a jaded tone of voice that learning been the fun part for him and he kinda wished he had it all to do over again. He said he envied me for having it all in front of me. (I didn't, of course. I've skied fewer than a dozen times in my life.) Anyway, Jeff was dressed in jeans and a poncho and had beat-up old skis and old-fashioned boots. I told him about the well-equipped Dad from the locker room and Jeff shook his head and said something like, "I'd rather surprise people than pretend I'm better than I am."
Anyway, that was my lesson.
Bulging bags full
Another memory along those lines: many years ago—it must have been the early '90s—my friend Kent P. invited me to the Michigan 400. He had pit passes. I took my trusty Leica M6 and 35mm Summicron, which I carried slung from my shoulder as always. It didn't get a single look—might as well have been invisible. (That was one of the things I liked about the M6.) Wandering around in the pit lanes before the race, it appeared that about every third male was equipped with camera gear. De rigeur was a large block-shaped camera bag carefully stuffed with bodies and many lenses, plus a tripod strapped on top. That seemed to be the fad, "fad" meaning that people look around at what everyone else is doing and mimic it. I shot a lot that day and got a lot of great shots, including portraits of A.J. Foyt and Niki Lauda (although the day was mainly notable for the shot that got away. I've told that story before). No one paid me the least little bit of attention. But as far as I could tell, none of the guys carrying the big bags took many pictures. As I watched him, one guy stopped, set his bag down, fished the camera out of the bag, looked for a lens, mounted it, then set up the tripod—in the middle of a sunny day!—appeared to take one picture, then reversed the whole process and put everything away again. It took ten minutes, or seemed like it. I took a picture of him doing it.
Then again, you schlepp what you need. Remember what Ansel Adams always said when people asked him what camera he used: "the biggest one I can carry!"
There's nothing wrong with a Z9 (I mean, look at that thing), and I'd use one if I wanted to or thought I needed it. No criticism of anyone else implied here. But given who I really am, carrying one around would probably feel like a form of posing for me, and I wouldn't feel comfortable doing it.
On the other hand
Oddly, the situation can be reversed if you're a professional. You want your equipment to say "I can do anything" and "I'm well equipped." At least if you deal with the public. I can tell you from experience that it's awkward to show up at a shoot with a camera that's not as good as the one your client owns!
Mike
Original contents copyright 2023 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)
Featured Comments from:
Moose: "I like the circularity of this post. You start with a story about how 'pro' equipment may be in the hands of a tyro, then end with '...it's awkward to show up at a shoot with a camera that's not as good as the one your client owns!'
"I knew that guy! The one with old jeans and tired wooden skis—who flew down any mountain like an angel, occasionally spinning in a a circle, one ski up at a 45° angle, spraying snow in all directions. One day, he hit a hole or something, and broke one ski into matchsticks. Undeterred, he went into the shop and bought a pair of the best metal skis. This mediocre skier, having difficulty with the switch from not worn-out wooden to metal, suggested he start carefully. No point; he was immediately still the most beautiful, graceful skier on the hills. I asked him what he thought of the new skis. 'They're nice,' he said, laconically."
Mark Rouleau: "Your camera gearhead story reminds me of two similar events, both of which happenend in Canada.
The first is when I took the family to Dufferin Islands. This is a series of man-made islands in the Niagara River. Very pretty area. I was playing with the Sigma DP1. Really the forefather of the large-sensor, small form factor cameras that we have now.
As we were parking, I watched a man exit his car with his SO, and, in the parking lot, started posing her, firing off shot after shot with his DSLR. His background was the cement brick building that housed the washroom (you call them restrooms) to the park. I told my wife, I may not be a great photographer, but at least when I take your picture there's not a bathroom behind you.
Another time, at Niagara-on-the-Lake, I got up extra early to catch the sunrise. I got a lot of great pictures out of that one. The light was amazing, so I got not only a sunrise over Fort George, but some lovely shots at the beach of driftwood and rocks. As I was dancing around taking as many shots as I could while the light was still amazing, I noticed an older gentleman, standing stock still, with an expensive DSLR with a white Canon lens attached, so, probably some bucks. In the 30–40 minutes I was flitting from place to place, he stood in the exact same spot, never bending over or looking up, keeping the camera at eye level, occasionally rotating it from side to side, no more than 45 degrees horizontally at most, but always on the same plane, shooting across the water. I did stop to look to see what was so interesting over there, but even with my telephoto, I couldn't see anything of interest. He was still there when I left. I hope he got good pictures of whatever it was he was after."
Soeren Engelbrecht: "This summer, our family went to the Faroe Islands (Situated in the North Atlantic)—in part to experience the amazing birds (like this one, which I was fortunate to catch myself). We went on a boat trip to the island of Mykines along with other tourists, many of whom were carrying large cameras and lenses. I particularly noted one lady with a Canon DSLR and a huge zoom (200–600mm or similar) due to two things: a). The bucket-size lens hood remained reverse-mounted for the whole trip b.) She probably had the camera on 'green mode,' because every time she tried to photograph birds on a dark cliff from the boat, the built-in flash popped up and fired."
Thomas Basista: "Wow! Talking about the very thing I saw Saturday. The local watershed association dedicated a new kayak/canoe access to the river. Basically a low-key, local event. No more than 30 people there. I was using my Panasonic FZ80 This guy shows up wearing a leather shoulder harness in 90-degree weather. There was a Nikon hanging from the harness on each hip, like a pair of pistols on a movie gunfighter. While most people were taking snaps with their phones, the camera slinger seemed to just be walking around. I did not see him take a single shot. I guess he just wanted to play photographer."
Mike Peters: "Re 'Oddly, the situation can be reversed if you're a professional. You want your equipment to say "I can do anything" and "I'm well equipped." At least if you deal with the public. I can tell you from experience that it's awkward to show up at a shoot with a camera that's not as good as the one your client owns!' The reality is, most of my clients own phones to take photographs. I've been shooting pro work with lowly Micro 4/3 gear for over 10 years now and nobody seems to notice or care. If your photographs don't make the case for you, then maybe you're in the wrong profession. My motto is use the gear that sets you free and is a joy to use. It's not the camera that makes the photo, it's the meat sack behind it."
adam: "I do user research consulting in very technical fields, and a big part of my job is to boil the findings from all the interviews I do down into some key points the client can act on. A few years ago I came across a piece of wisdom I try to keep in mind: 'The beginner makes things complex in order to demonstrate their expertise. The expert makes things simple in order to demonstrate their expertise.'"
It's about the same size as a Nikon F5, of which I sometimes carried two at a time. (It's a hair shorter and less wide, a hair thicker. It's also a bit lighter than an F5.) I'd actually feel less dorky with a Z9 than with a Z8, because the Z9 is so ugly that it's obviously a *tool,* rather than a wannabe extravagance. But, when it comes to actual photography, as opposed to the way you feel about your camera, I don't know why anyone would buy a Z9 rather than a Z8 or Z7II. I really like Nikons, and have been a Nikon user most of my life, but lately have been carrying a Fuji X-T5. Still have a couple of Z cameras, but the lenses are so large that they're just less fun to work with. (The lenses are large, but I have to say, they're also terrific.)
Posted by: John Camp | Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 01:38 PM
When I first got an SLR, I got a bag that would hold it and several lenses. And what I learned from that is that I hate changing lenses in the field. I absolutely hate it. It’s far better to go out with a single lens and get the shots I can get than to lug all that around.
Posted by: Will Duquette | Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 02:01 PM
I think the Z9 looks sleek compared to your monochrome rig! I’ll stick with my never-noticed M10 Monochrom, with a form factor almost identical to your M6. Have you tried the loaner M Monochrom (not quite as sleek or quiet) yet?
Posted by: Jeff | Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 02:53 PM
In 2008 I attended a small town hot rod show here in California with my Nikon D100. I was approached by a guy a bit older than I who asked for help with his camera. He had a brand new Nikon D1 with a giant wide angle zoom hanging around his neck. While I figured out how to set up the camera to be as automatic as possible, he told me he had just retired, decided to take up photography and went to the local camera store (we still had them then). They sent him away with the most expensive Nikon camera and lenses in the store and only a quick help session. I programmed the D1 to be as automatic as possible and sent him on his way. Perhaps that is one way many people get overloaded with camera gear.
The car show was fun too - 2008 web page.
http://jimhayes.com/photo/Cars/fallbrook2008/index.html
Posted by: JH | Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 03:21 PM
It would be interesting to hear from your readers the ratio of pictures taken with their phone to the number of pictures taken with a camera.
I'll start. So far today I've taken 61 pictures with my phone and shared ("published") five of those. I've taken none with my "real" camera. These are for me and sharing with friends and family.
Tomorrow I'm photographing an event which usually means one or two hundred pictures with my "real" camera and I expect that 20 or 30 of those will be shared with the event coordinator for publication (on-line/social media, magazine etc). In addition I will take about half the "real" camera number using my phone.
Posted by: Speed | Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 03:25 PM
I love street photography with my Panny GX7 and 20mm 1.7 lens. Totally innocuous and people think it's a Leica once they see it.
Posted by: Dan | Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 04:12 PM
"...my trusty Leica M6 and 35mm Summicron, ... It didn't get a single look—might as well have been invisible..."
Today, carrying an M6 with a small Summicron might have some envious millennial come up and ask how you were lucky enough to find a Fujifilm X100V.😉
Posted by: Albert Smith | Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 06:05 PM
Can you post your Niki Lauda picture please?
[I could, but I would have to go find it first. And that could take a whole afternoon. I have more pictures around this place than a junkie has troubles. --Mike]
Posted by: Sam | Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 07:32 PM
"Oddly, the situation can be reversed if you're a professional. You want your equipment to say "I can do anything" and "I'm well equipped."
This makes me recall your story about Jane Bown in December 2014. Some of the best photographers are not particularly interested in equipment.
Posted by: Chris Nicholls | Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 11:10 PM
One of my first experiences with the “camera dork” was a VHS video that came with a camera I bought when I was around 20. It featured a classic camera dork (floppy hat, beard, big glasses, vest full of pockets) telling the viewer all about the “essential equipment” that every serious photographer needs. He then proceeded to pull all that stuff out of his bag to show the item and in some cases demonstrate usage. It was a bit like a magician’s bag in that it seemed impossible that so much stuff could fit in there, including every conceivable prime lens (24mm, 28mm, 35mm, fast 35mm, 50mm, fast 50mm, macro 50mm, 135mm) plus a series of zooms (28-50, 35-70, 70-300, etc.). All that in one bag! And the implication was that we all needed all of that stuff. Nope!
Posted by: Ed Hawco | Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 12:10 PM
I believe the phrase you’re looking for here is ‘All the gear, no idea’.
Posted by: Patrick Medd | Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 01:00 PM
Maybe some of the people who appear to have over bought during the film era and early days of digital wanted a specific feature that wasn't available in less expensive bodies. In the old days, relatively low-cost cameras, that is models not considered pro-level, used to come with mirror lock-up – the Minolta SRT 101, for example. Some of the mid-range Nikon bodies had this feature, also. Maybe if I had gotten an F3HP in 1985, I would have never bought another body, but in 2002 when I was ready to upgrade to a body with MLU, autofocus, and good eye relief, the F5 seemed like the obvious choice.
Posted by: Robert Pillow | Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 03:04 PM
I have NOT used a "real" camera recently. Since I got my IPhone Xs I stopped using a "real" camera. Now I have no reason to carry a hated camera bag. Or change leaves.
As Terry Richdson once said all my clients have better cameras than I do. That didn't stop him from making a lot money with his snapshot style.
Posted by: c.d.embrey | Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 04:48 PM
My fascination is why so many people take a flash when traveling, or indeed a large tripod, when available light photography is so easy with high ISO sensitivities. There are reasons to take a tripod and a flash, but in the Arizona desert in full sun, or traipsing through Florence these are generally not necessary. People say they want to maximize quality. Shoot at 400 ISO with IBIS and you will match a tripod. Use a flash to make a lousy picture of your family that looks like it was taken by an old Instamatic. Why? In my opinion these are a complete waste of space and may lead to a disgust with the whole process. These tools have a use, but when I see normal tourists with them I always wonder who told them this was the way to go.
Posted by: Chris | Monday, 31 July 2023 at 03:02 PM
I remember, after several years of discrete shooting with a Leica rangefinder, I purchased a Nikon Z6 and the 50mm f1.8 lens (wanted to try out the "new" mirrorless Nikon). Pretty basic kit with no giant zoom lens, but everywhere I went, I had the feeling of people seeing my camera before they saw me. Way too many "oh, he's got a camera" looks too many times. I was uncomfortable with that camera, so I sold it.
Posted by: Hank | Friday, 04 August 2023 at 10:49 AM