You're going to laugh at me. But here's how my reasoning went:
A few weeks ago, when we discussed it, I decided to take a stab at learning touch-typing. I've been having increasing trouble with typing; I've slowed from 60 WPM in my forties to 43 WPM now, and on bad typing days it actually discourages me from writing. And I love to write. One problem is that as my fingers fly around the keyboard, I more often hit two keys instead of one now. So my error rate has been rising. I reasoned that touch-typing might alleviate some of these problems, and perhaps forestall further decline.
It was an anniversary, too. I was turning 64, and I got my first typewriter as a birthday present when I was 14. Half a century had gone by. Which seems incredible (somehow humans have trouble believing that they grow old).
At age 14, when I got that typewriter, my father described home-row touch typing to me and then left me alone. I tried to type that way for a while, but it was frustrating and slow. So I made an impulsive decision—to forego home-row touch typing for just a few minutes and hunt and peck, on account of it was faster and more convenient. I recall I wanted to learn to write; my primary goal was not to learn to type. I figured I'd just hunt and peck a bit while I was messing around, and get back to learning proper typing after a hour or two, or a day or two.
Well, of course I never did get back to it.
KAS
A while back, I forget how long—eight or ten years maybe—I got interested in keyboards, because I was having a touch of RSI-type hand pain. I tried a few and settled on the Microsoft 4000 Ergonomic keyboard, which was big and clunky but a bit more comfortable for me than the elegant-looking little Apple keyboards I had previously used.
One keyboard I got interested in at that time was the Kinesis Advantage, a strange-looking contraption with the keys clustered in "key wells" at either end of the keyboard, with "thumb clusters" to shift some of the work of typing to the traditionally underused thumbs. (Here's what it looks like.) I requested a review sample, but Kinesis suggested that if I wasn't already a touch typist I was unlikely to appreciate the experience, and they demurred. I let it go.
Cut to now. Since I was going to learn touch typing from scratch anyway, I thought to myself (that's the way I think, to myself), why not learn it on that Kinesis keyboard? So I ordered one.
I had to think twice about it; the bloody things are expensive. It was scheduled to arrive on my birthday, so I figured I could rationalize it as being a birthday present to myself. Then it arrived two days early, which was a nifty bit of parallelism, because my grandmother's typewriter arrived two days prior to my 14th birthday, and my parents allowed me to open it early. So I got the Kinesis Advantage2 exactly 50 years to the day after I got my Adler Satellite 2001 electric portable, my first typewriter.
But in all my research on touch-typing (I got rather immersed), one thing I kept reading over and over again is that you shouldn't look at the keyboard. "No matter what you do." "The first rule of touch typing is...." Well, in my customary five-fingered way of hunting and pecking—let me refer to this as "pecking" for short—I look at the keyboard frequently. So I found it almost impossible not to look at the keyboard of the Kinesis as I assayed my early clumsy attempts at this new skill. Worse, when I did manage to keep my eyes off the keyboard, I found my mind going through the following process trying to locate a given letter: first, picture in my mind how I would hit that letter in pecking mode; see where the letter was, visually, in my mind; then translate that location mentally to the home-row method, figure out which finger should be hitting it, and find the key that way. By this ponderous mental method I was forging forward at, I don't know, a blistering half-word a minute, maybe.
I exaggerate. But not by much.
But the Kinesis is programmable. I thought, hey, look at this, you can switch to an entirely different keyboard layout with the touch of a couple of buttons. That would solve the problem—looking at the keyboard wouldn't do any good if the letters were in different places, right? It would be like typing with blank keys.
Now, you would think that, having made a fatefully impulsive decision 50 years ago when learning how to type, I would, in my august maturity, be a little leery of impulsive decisions when it comes to re-learning how to to type.
But no, turns out.
I switched the Kinesis to the Dvorak layout.
I figured I was just messing around, and could revert to QWERTY in a day or two. No big deal.
That was two weeks ago. The Kinesis has not come out of Dvorak mode since. I really had no intention of this when I started out; in fact I barely knew the Dvorak layout existed (I know all about it now, as you might expect).
Quixotic?
So that is a long-winded explanation of how come I am attempting to learn a.) touch typing, b.) the Dvorak layout, and c.) the oddball Kinesis keyboard...all at the same time. Yes, this is very Mike, I know. Yes, we all know the possibility of bailure is sky-high.
However, I've been working very hard at it. Two or three hours every day, sometimes even a little more. I've already put in my first hour this morning.
It is going...slowly. Ever so slowly. Agonizingly slowly. Frustratingly so. But it's the struggle that's important, right? Like learning to play a musical instrument. I'm challenging my mind. Burning new synaptic pathways.
Along those lines, I've been forced to admit to myself the possibility that the old gray matter has stiffened like an artery and no longer has the flexibility to cope with being thus rewired. As you know, I am wont to refer to the likes of us as Photo Dawgs, and despite my steely determination I am forced to concede that maybe the old saw is true and that you cannot in fact teach an old Dawg a new trick. The thing is up in the air. My little fingers are taking great umbrage at being called upon to work all on their own for the first time in memory. My mind is stubbornly refusing to learn to coordinate my fingers on the home row (with which you do 70% of your typing in Dvorak, versus 29% in QWERTY).
On the other hand, there is just the faintest glimmer of light at the end of the long tunnel. I can barely see it; you know that trick, in the gloaming, as night arrives, how you can concentrate on something but look at it with your peripheral vision and somehow see it better? The light at the end of the tunnel is like that right now. But it's there. I think it's there. I'm pretty sure it's there. Sometimes I type a letter entirely by reflex, without thinking of it in the slightest.
Mostly I have to think with great effort about nearly every move. At two weeks I've learned the letter keys and the basic punctuation marks, and how to shift. And my speed has crept up to fifteen words a minute in the best case, although I can almost not type with 100% accuracy at any speed or any amount of concentration.
The effort has laid bare some of the infirmities of my brain, which is interesting. Here's one such oddity: I've observed that each day, I seem to have a different blind spot. One day I will just not be able to separate N and T in my mind; the next day I will find N and T somehow sorted, but have a sudden essential confusion regarding O; the day after that I will abruptly forget how to type R, with which I had previously had no trouble. Mental hiccups of some sort, seems like.
That's plenty of this for now. Suffice to say I am typing this post the old way, on the old keyboard. It would have taken me till next Tuesday to type it under the new regime. My objective is to reach the point that I can go cold turkey, and set the old keyboard aside for good, and do all my work on the new keyboard while touch-typing. My ultimate goal is to achieve my current 43 WPM, only with ease and comfort, less thought, greater relaxation, and fewer errors. My stretch goal—the Grail, as it were, the chalice—is to do so while returning to my peak speed of 60 WPM. The possibility of the latter, at this moment, seems, shall we say, remote.
For the time being, however, I persist, redoubtable and indefatigable. I still have another two weeks before I lose the privilege of returning the keyboard. Come, Sancho! On, Rosinante! A fire-breathing dragon or a windmill yonder lies!
Mike
Gear o' The Week:
If I could shoot with any 50mm focal-length-equivalent lens, it would not be unobtanium: it would be the relatively modest, relatively older HD Pentax 35mm ƒ/2.8 DA Macro Limited on APS-C (it has recently been revised with new coatings). I don't know how it measures and couldn't care less. If you care first and foremost about pictures, especially prints, it is one beautiful lens. Luverly. As a normal too. This link is a portal to Amazon, through which most anything you purchase will be credited to TOP. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
B&H Photo also has the Magic Macro, naturally.
Original contents copyright 2021 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Steve Rosenblum: "The good news is that all the research on aging brains and neuro-plasticity seem to show that stretching your brain by making it do something new like this is very good for it."
Mike replies: That's really half the reason I'm doing it. Also, curiously, my regular typing has speeded up quite a bit.
Dillan: "What I want to know is: how the heck did you hit 60 WPM without using a keyboard properly? That's really quite amazing!"
Mike replies: I think that's more common than you might think. I've been doing an awful lot of reading about typing lately, so I can't tell you where it was, but I'm pretty sure I read an article recently about how hunt-and-peck typists are closer in speed to touch-typists on average than people would guess. That's why my goals are in the areas of comfort, lack of errors, and smoothness rather than speed. For instance, the consensus seems to be that the Dvorak layout is only marginally faster than QWERTY, but most people agree it is more comfortable. If you look at videos of people typing both, you can see that Dvorak typists are moving their fingers noticeably less. In fact, in some videos they seem to be moving their fingers so little that they don't even appear to be really typing.
Henry David Thoreau: "If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away."
John Krill: "In my senior year in high school I took a typewriting class. How easy can that be? Also the teacher, Miss Lee, was the most beautiful teacher in the school. On the first day of class she told us we could sit anywhere. I immediately grabbed the desk right next to the teacher's desk. That typewriting class was my all-time favorite class. I even got an A. But I got the A not because I had a crush on the teacher but because I turned out to be a good typist. The reason was because the typewriter had no lettering on the keys. I memorized all the letter locations, and that didn't take long, and from that point on it was just working on faster typing with fewer mistakes. And smiling at Miss Lee. Since then I have had no problem with typing but I have ended up doing a combination of touch and hunt. As they say: Whatever Works For You. Miss Lee would be in her 80s now and I still think of her often."
Nick: "Oy. All this talk about keyboard layouts had me thinking about it, with thoughts like, 'Well, where is the O key, anyway?' I've been touch-typing for more than 30 years, and I'm easily above 90 WPM when I get going. However, I do not think about it. Ever. Because once I do, then I have to think about where, e.g., the O key is, rather than just hitting it, and Very Bad Things happen to my speed and accuracy. I managed to get through typing this little comment, but I quake at the thought of further discussion that makes me think about the keyboard layout more...."
Sharon: "A friend of mine taught typing in high school. When I gave my son (elementary age) a typewriter, she said nuh uh, put that up. She said if you don't learn to type correctly to start with, it is much harder to ever learn it. And that was with kids...just saying. :-D"
Mike replies: I hear you. I might indeed fail at this despite my best efforts. I can feel how difficult it is to change. But I'm not going to give up just yet. In fact if you'll excuse me I'm late for my midday practice session!
David Dyer-Bennet: "The history of Dvorak is long, complicated—and deeply interlaced with fraud. A 'quick Google' finds a lot of lies, or at least things claimed without much basis. It may be somewhat better. It's not strikingly better or worse—or there would be replicable experiments showing one or the other after 80 years! Maybe the exotic keyboard is necessary for the state of your hands, but you are in the process of teaching yourself to never be comfortable using a laptop again, or any stock or cheap keyboard, or any keyboard on anybody else's computer. And, um, the one company making what you're learning may go bust. Best of luck, anyway! I'm quite sure I would need hugely stronger reasons to make such a big conversion myself."
Mike replies: Thank you, but you needn't worry. I'm certainly not recommending that you or anyone else do this. It's highly idiosyncratic and eccentric, I know. As with most such things with me, this will probably end up as a learning experience rather than a change of lifestyle. It already has been a rewarding learning experience, actually.
To your points: I've been typing slowly with four fingers and one thumb on QWERTY keyboards for 50 years and literally more than ten million words—I doubt I'll abruptly lose all familiarity with it.
Second, I virtually never need to type on someone else's keyboard. I can't remember the last time I needed to.
Re laptops, I've owned two laptops and got rid of them both because I used them so little it just didn't make sense to keep them. I could go a year without touching one. The only time I used one regularly was when I was in the long-distance relationship with Sara and was traveling frequently, and in that case I kept a Microsoft 4000 keyboard at her house that I used with the laptop. Non-split keyboards of any kind are already uncomfortable for me because of the way they make me hold my wrists.
As for Dvorak, I got into it purely adventitiously, as I described. It wasn't a deliberate decision. The experiments show that experienced typists do gain a negligible amount of speed...but, as I reported above, most people who master both say Dvorak is more comfortable. You can watch a video of people typing both and you'll be struck by how much less the Dvorak typists are moving their hands and fingers. That does appeal to me about it, because my hands are not as nimble as they used to be. My method of typing involves large jumps with my fingers, and they just don't land as accurately as they once did. I frequently strike two keys simultaneously by mistake. And, per Wikipedia, "most major modern operating systems (such as Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, Chrome OS, and BSD) allow a user to switch to the Dvorak layout."
But I'm not making any claim that Dvorak is "better." I have no real way of judging.
Finally, as for the Kinesis Advantage, it has been around since 2002 and there are plenty of them out there.
It's kind of interesting that what instigated all this is that I thought the Microsoft keyboard I use had been discontinued. The 4000 model was indeed discontinued, but there is a very similar replacement, the Microsoft Ergonomic Keyboard. But by the time I learned that, I was already thinking about what new keyboard I might switch to. That's why I remembered the Kinesis.
Pak Ming Wan: "I liked reading about your travails on keyboards—I'm a total keyboard fan and have about 10 keyboards in my bottom drawer that I change between. Shifting between different keyboard models forces subtle changes in posture that I like.
"A related story: when I moved to France, I had to adopt to AZERTY keyboards (instead of QWERTY). Not only are the letters on each key different, but EU keyboards also have a key layout—with a larger L shaped enter key (in Australia, I grew up on US keyboards). Changing between EU and US now isn't such a big deal for me, but I do have a strong preference for US keyboard layouts. You might never get used to that Evolution, but change to free up your adaptation skills is a real bonus of having different input devices.
"P.S. Typed on a HHKB Lite keyboard, my current axe for cutting code."
Re: "It would be like typing with blank keys."
You can actually buy keyboards with blank keys, e.g., https://www.daskeyboard.com/blog/type-like-a-badass-go-blank/.
I can touch type most of the time, but have to hunt-and-peck when one of our cats is in my lap, so blank keyboards would be a disaster for me.
Posted by: kevin willoughby | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 09:58 AM
TOP is becoming a "Trueman Show". I can't wait till the next episode.
Grant
Posted by: Grant | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 10:03 AM
So you are leaning to touch type on a Dvorak & non standard keyboard and alternating with a ‘normal’ & QWERTY one, what could possibly go wrong?
What speed can you do dictating to the Mac, iPad or iPhone?
Posted by: Richard Parkin | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 10:15 AM
Mike: “My objective is to reach the point that I can go cold turkey, and set the old keyboard aside for good, and do all my work on the new keyboard while TOUGH typing.” (sic)
Freudian.
Posted by: Jeff | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 10:17 AM
The best advice my father ever gave me was to take typing class in high school. I may have been the only boy in the class which was not a bad thing.
Posted by: Speed | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 10:33 AM
Buy a copy of Dragon speech recognition software and only use the keyboard for corrections. Works great for me.
Posted by: Dave Kocher | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 10:42 AM
Maybe you can view it as a meditation? The practice firmly places you in the present moment, the here and now, fully self aware. Who knows, maybe enlightenment comes next?
Posted by: MikeR | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 10:50 AM
Mike,
I got a chuckle out of this quote: "My objective is . . . set the old keyboard aside for good, and do all my work on the new keyboard while tough typing."
Tough typing is what you're going through!
Please keep at it. It's going to take some time to remember the locations of the "new" keys on the Dvorak keyboard. I would take 10 times longer if I had to switch from the standard keyboard to Dvorak.
In radio, those trying to learn Morse code are advised to choose a speed faster than about 10 wpm, in order to avoid constructing a lookup table in their minds. They are advised to just listen to the sounds of the dots and dashes.
It seems that you are trying to translate from the standard keyboard to Dvorak. Just go straight to Dvorak without the intermediary step. It takes a while, but it'll click someday. You've only been doing this for a couple of weeks or so. It takes time, but then it'll just fall in place.
Relax, channel your inner Star Wars and just feel the force when typing. ;)
Posted by: Dave | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 10:51 AM
Man, just get it over with and drive a nail into your head. Put the keyboard back to QUERTY and get a simple touch typing application like Mavis Beacon (or something like that). The only thing the Military did for me was teach me to touch type. I was trained as a cryptographer, and all the crypto equipment of the day was keyboard driven. Eight hours a day, five days a week, for a month. At the end, if we couldn’t do 100+ wpm error free, we were in trouble. So, if you really want to learn this, do it the simple way. QUERTY and time. Put a tea towel over your hands/keyboard so you can’t see anything if you tried. Also, though you’ve spent the money already, dump the oddball keyboard and get a Logitech K350. You’ll thank me. I’m now in my 70’s and have slowed down to about 85 wpm.
Posted by: Rand Scott Adams | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 11:07 AM
I took typewriting in high school, Mike. And I did well, earning an A. The problem was, I was already working in a professional radio newsroom on the weekend. I didn't have time to allow my typing speed to rise organically. I needed to pound out copy pronto.
So on weekends, I defaulted to a kind of half qwerty, half hunt-and-peck style - usually using six or eight fingers - that worked for me. And that's what I stuck with throughout my career. My typing speed ran in the 60 words-per-minute range and my error rate was acceptable. If I had to type a formal letter or document, I would simply slow down.
But now, in the twilight if my career (we are the same age), I'm finding my error rate is rising quite a bit as my speed falls. I invert characters a whole lot these days. At least I spot the mistakes and correct them. I'm not sure if the problem is mental or physical. No doubt there is some arthritis in my fingers. But computer keyboards - even full-sized examples - haven't helped, either.
I'll probably be able to limp into retirement this way. I have no interest in re-learning how to type.
Posted by: Steve Biro | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 11:07 AM
And once you've mastered Dvorak you can start learning Swype to speed your phone typing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJ-RAefCG_c
Posted by: Speed | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 11:12 AM
I took typing in high school. It was a one semester course. An hour a day, five days a week for four months or so. I really think that's about how much time it takes to learn touch typing. You just have to keep at it.
Posted by: Dave Levingston | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 11:15 AM
Muscle memory is vastly unrated, and comes at great cost. This is why changing cameras less often, and being monogamous to one kind, helps “get the camera out of the way.” If you succeed in your quest to learn a less common keyboard, will you be able to use keyboards on other devices like laptops and iPads? Seems like a big risk to general long-term efficiency.
Just saying...
Posted by: Cecelia | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 11:44 AM
Semi related side note. A while back a co-worker and I had a discussion on why the letters on a keyboard are sequenced like they are as there seems to be no rhyme or reason to the order. Well a google search gave the answer. The letters were purposely scrambled to keep folks from typing too fast which caused early typewriters to jam. Personally I do better with my on screen keyboard than a real one.
Posted by: Mike Ferron | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 11:45 AM
"Along those lines, I've been forced to admit to myself the possibility that the old gray matter has stiffened like an artery and no longer has the flexibility to cope with being thus rewired..." MJ
brain flexibility needed? Exercise is conducive to better cognition at all ages. References?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951958/
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/03/well/move/exercise-aging-brains.html
Walk longer : type faster.
Posted by: Kirk | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 11:52 AM
I wish you all the luck in the world, but it seems like you are making this waaaay more difficult than it has to be. The whole point of touch typing is that you don't have to think about it, just like I'm sure you don't think about operating the clutch and manual transmission in your car anymore. The proper techniques help take you to that place of not having to visualize your fingers.
Reading the description of your learning process made me think of a video I watched once of a circus performer who can shoot a bow and arrow with her feet, while standing on her hands, at a balloon placed right above another performer's head. So, a bit riskier than a typing mistake. But, instead of trying to start by learning to shoot the bow and arrow with your hands, while sighting right down the arrow, you've jumped straight to "foot archery." Not only that, but you keep switching which foot you hold the bow with, and you also switch between a couple different types of bows, and then for good measure you revert back to just poking the balloon with a sharp pencil when you get tired of standing on your hands.
Like I said, good luck, but I don't think you're giving yourself very good odds of success.
Posted by: ASW | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 11:55 AM
Good luck and keep at it!
I was lucky to get a course in school, think it was 8th grade maybe, in touch typing.
And that was on type writers!
Enter the computer era and my studies at college some 20 years later.
Finally I can put it to good use. This is maybe the one thing from school that I got most use out of.
Besides the 3 Rs of course!
Posted by: Johan Grahn | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 12:12 PM
I tried to learn to touch type, some 40+ years ago. I'd been keyboarding for years: punched card and punched tape machines, ASR33 Teletypes, early VDUs. It was clear that typing was going to be an increasingly important part of my life. Thought I'd better take a touch typing self-teach course, obviously better than my rather speedy hunt and peck.
Within 2 weeks of starting to learn to touch type, I had a serious brush with RSI!
I gave up my self-teach course and have been happily hunting and pecking at speed ever since! I hope your mileage does vary, as they almost used to say...
Posted by: Chris Rusbridge | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 12:19 PM
I learned to type in middle school. We had basically two workshops, electricity and typewriting. All the boys wanted to be in electricity, to play with cables and, well, be a man. But my mother gave me one of the few irrevocable orders that I ever heard from her: I would take typewriting and that was the end of it.
She gave me a beautiful mechanical German machine, an Erika 40, made in the '60s, that belonged to her. I remember that in the workshop we used a cloth over our hands to avoid gazing at the keys.
Back then, at 14 years old, I didn't know that typing would be as essential as walking in my adult life. But, apparently, my mother knew, or maybe she wanted it to be so. Until her last days, she kept every single piece of newspaper or magazine with my texts. I wish I could have published much more while she was alive.
Keep going Mike, touch-typing can also be a joy.
Posted by: Francisco Cubas | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 12:35 PM
Forget "learning" to touch-type at your age. Some years ago my wife (who did learn touch typing as a teen) told me that I already learned it. She advised that I just stop looking at the keyboard and just type. She speculated that the few mistakes I made would quickly diminish with time.
And she was dead right! Simple daily drudgery has already trained me to "touch type" on a standard qwerty board. Try it yourself.
[You're right. I actually do type mostly not looking at the keyboard. But my index fingers are flying all over the place so I am making more and more mistakes. --Mike]
Posted by: Kenneth Tanaka | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 01:02 PM
Have you considered using a dictation app instead of typing? For example Siri on a mac.
Blll Lewis
Posted by: william weston lewis | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 01:46 PM
I've actually learned typing in a formal typing school, as that was the thing when I got my first typewriter. Even did an exam and passed without a problem. But I don't think I ever typed like that again afterward. I've found some way between what I'm supposed to do and what works for me. And I have no clue how fast I type. That exam was the only time I cared (and I used to be a wire service journalist, so speed was important).
Posted by: John | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 01:49 PM
"My ultimate goal is to achieve my current 43 WPM, only with ease and comfort, less thought, greater relaxation, and fewer errors. My stretch goal—the Grail, as it were, the chalice—is to do so while returning to my peak speed of 60 WPM. "
Yes, but can you think at 60 WPM? :)
Posted by: Ed Kirkpatrick | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 02:08 PM
Merriam-Webster's definition of Quixotic: foolishly impractical.
Posted by: c.d.embrey | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 03:16 PM
I think that looking at the screen while typing is over rated, I don't quite hunt and peck but use about two fingers on each hand and thumbs. My train of thought remains in tact while I type looking at the keyboard but is ruined by watching words magically appear on the screen, I start reading not writing and that slows me down. I always need a read over anyway and that's where I pick up the mistakes. WPM is not what I am trying to do rather produce coherent paragraphs that communicate my ideas/conclusions.
Posted by: Alan | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 04:11 PM
There’s a Larson cartoon for this:
“ High above the hushed crowd, Rex tried to remain focused. Still, he couldn’t shake one nagging thought: he was an old dog, and this was a new trick”
I’d post the cartoon in question, but I’m sure that would be against all “the rules”
Good luck with the transition
Posted by: Gavin Paterson | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 05:32 PM
What do you call a person who can touch type on both DVORAK and QWERTY keyboards? (That sounds like a pun, but I was actually curious...)
Posted by: David | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 05:55 PM
It's still an Optical Paragon :) - I picked one up for my 5yo to go with her K-3 and the images that trio produce are from a different world, imagination know no bounds.
Posted by: Robbie Corrigan | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 05:56 PM
My mother insisted that I learned to type when I went to University, and bought me an Olivetti portable in 1966. I learned to touch type on it, but then took jobs that did not require typing. Years later, working for a multinational (in Australia), we transmitted product orders by telex to our head office, so my skills came to the fore again, as time equaled money on the telex lines.
I was then given a different role, flying around the country, where I had a Phillips dictaphone, and used to mail the micro-cassettes back to my secretary, (remember them?) who would have all my correspondence typed, ready for signing, on my return.
It was a real shock a couple of years later that I found myself at another company, where I was expected to type my own letters on an online terminal to a mainframe, and then later on one of the first “portable” computers, a Compaq “sewing machine” with, I think, 10 Mb of storage.
I bounced around SE Asia in later years, either with or without secretaries, but then found myself home in Australia again, and no secretaries in sight, they had become extinct in my absence.
My mother’s foresight has proven invaluable since then, as I still type faster than I can write (and a lot more legibly), but am going to investigate dictation on an Apple computer again, as my typing speed has declined in counterpoint to the advancing years.
Posted by: Gavin Paterson | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 06:02 PM
Actually, if it was a pun:
Q: "What do you call someone who can touch type on both QWERTY and DVORAK keyboards"?
A: "dsfjgknr,mtgioxvc"
Posted by: David | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 06:02 PM
Yoda had the right advice, "Use the force!"
If you think about how you are typing, it slows you down and causes mistakes. You have to type with your brainstem handling the typing while you brain is dictating what to type.
Strangely enough, that's how I taught drivers on track days. The operation of the car had to become instinctive - driving with your brainstem - in order to concentrate on how to drive fast on the track.
I have no idea how fast I type but it's fast enough for my brain to compose what I want to record in real time. The goal is not typing, it's to get things recorded.
I've been doing so much writing in the last year that for the first time my fingertips are getting calloused!
Afterthought - I have big hands and cannot type fast on small keyboards like laptops. I use a big Macally keyboard. I also like keys that have some stroke and click. Tactile feedback helps.
My advice - figure what works for you and go with it.
Posted by: JimH | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 06:26 PM
For many years, Stephen Jay Gould wrote a regular article for the Museum of Natural History magazine usually but not always on evolutionary topics. However, he did write one article on the history of the QWERTY keyboard. As I recall, he concluded that the reason for the layout was for sales purposes - namely, the word "typewriter" consists of letters solely on the top line, which enabled sales staff to type it for potential purchasers as extraordinary speed, which in turn caused QWERTY typewriters to be sold at such extraordinary speed that they became the de facto standard. Touch typing was invented quite some time later.
In your touch typing adventures Mike, I would not pay too much attention to the book learning that you should not watch the keyboard. The typing manuals derive from training for copy-typists on typewriters - obviously, it slows down a copy typist significantly if they have to take their eyes off the page they are copying. You do not need to play in that league. I would suggest that you look at your fingers as needed but try to lift your eyes to the screen as often as possible so that your muscle memory takes over. And typing is really all about muscle memory - you just need to repeat typing words over and over so many times that it becomes automated. I was never particularly fast on a typewriter but can type about as fast I can think on a computer keyboard - especially as there is now auto-correct....
I never learned DVORAK but my you few friends who mastered it advise that you should choose QWERTY or DVORAK and not try to do both - it will more than double the development time for muscle memory as you need to consciously choose between systems all the time. DVORAK is supposed to be much easier to learn because it has been developed around efficient letter placement and finger use. I am also told that DVORAK is much better for you if you are prone to RSI type injuries, because the layout is far more ergonomic and efficient than QWERTY.
Posted by: Bear. | Tuesday, 09 March 2021 at 08:03 PM
I love the comments section here. Such bonhomie. Adieu!
Posted by: Kye Wood | Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 02:18 AM
I learned touch typing a long time ago, and what I remember is the teacher saying that my fingers should do the typing not my brain. You should train your fingers! There seems to be many touch typing exercise sites, if you don’t already you should pethaps try one of those.
Posted by: Leif Trulsson | Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 03:05 AM
Wait. Henry David Thoreau has email??
[I was rather more impressed that he can comment despite being dead for almost 159 years. But then I guess all authors are deathless: even Homer can tell us what he thinks. :-) --Mike]
Posted by: Luke | Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 08:03 AM
What wil happen if you have no time limit due to the return window of the keyboard? Will that somehow help you with this attempt?
Here is a hard promise: I will buy the keyboard from you when you are finished with it. In two weeks, two months.. two years?
[You're on, and thank you! I'm feeling rather determined actually. I have been enjoying practicing, and interested in observing my own progress. My own mental glitches have always interested me...have you ever read "The Man Who Mistook His Wife For a Hat?" One of the more interesting books I've read in my reading career. The workings of the brain are strange and fascinating. --Mike]
Posted by: Sam Pieter | Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 08:37 AM
DVORAK is catnip to autodidact types (pun unintended, but approved). Not long after I got my first PC, I tried and failed to convert.
Like other commenters, I took a typing course in high school (on sweet IBM Selectrics), and like some others practiced on my own, guided by the fictional Mavis Beacon. The one residual nugget of wisdom from those days that seems lodged in my unreliable memory is that the task is to cultivate efficient gestures for common words, roots and letter combinations. However, it's quite possible that I'm transposing more recent efforts to learn the piano on my more distant past.
So, call it a hare-brained theory, but I suspect that some hunt-and-peckers get tripped up thinking touch-typing is done solely by the fingers rather than the whole hand, wrist and forearms working together in gestures. The latter approach is also more ergonomic, i.e. safer, and ultimately faster. I think the greater resistance and key travel on older keyboards and typewriters actually helped us with this.
Thus, an important reason not to look at the keys, whether one is learning typing or piano-playing or saxophone, is that we may otherwise cultivate unsafe or inefficient movements and postures for the sake of seeing, and thus risk cumulative injury down the road, and limit our potential speed as well. Posture matters, and with the keyboard in the healthiest place for our bodies, it's not that easy to see the keys and maintain good sitting posture at the same time. Better to avoid that temptation.
Posted by: robert e | Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 11:29 AM
Helpful sites for you, Mike:
Basic touch typing:
https://www.typing.com/student/lessons
Annoying but good practice:
https://www.keybr.com/
Good practice:
https://10fastfingers.com/advanced-typing-test/english
More enjoyable practice when you get tired of typing random words and sentences at the other sites--retype classic novels:
https://www.typelit.io/
Posted by: brian | Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 02:40 PM
Check this:
https://www.typingtutor-online.com/
It’s free and reminds me of the lessons I took 55 yrs ago.
Good luck.
Greetings from a stormy Utrecht
Posted by: G Geradts | Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 06:54 PM
I started using the Dvorak layout in high school having never learning to touch type with QWERTY(despite many sessions with a flashy, gamified typing tutor).
To do so I made use of this resource, which I found to be adequate, though rather spartan:
https://www.mit.edu/people/jcb/Dvorak/dvorak-course/
Shortly after learning to touch type in Dvorak, I discovered that I could now touch type in QWERTY, though at a somewhat reduced rate - 30-40WPM, compared to 60+ in Dvorak (though this improves with practice).
Interestingly, I have never used Dvorak on a smartphone or tablet computer, and have had great difficulty in finding the letters when I have set the displayed keyboard to Dvorak.
Posted by: Francis | Thursday, 11 March 2021 at 01:06 AM