Late August is traditionally known as the "dog days of Summer" in the Northern hemisphere. Google defines it as "the hottest period of the year (reckoned in antiquity from the heliacal rising of Sirius, the Dog Star)." I had to look up heliacal, although you can guess—"relating to or near the sun." Urban Dictionary says the dog days of Summer are those days "in the summer where it is so hot or humid that the dogs go crazy." Where? Ouch. Use your writing words, U.D.: when.
(My least favorite example of using speech words in place of writing words: that for who. "The athletes that are coming home from Rio early." It greats every time! It should be, of course, "The athletes who are coming home from Rio early.")
(Greats for grates: just my little joke. That's the kind of thing that always grates.)
You know what word always bugged me? Read. Because the past tense and the present tense are pronounced differently but spelled the same. Who decided that? "I was so bored yesterday I read ("red") three-quarters of my new book." "Are you going to read ("reed") that new bestseller, Hillbilly Elegy?"
Cover photograph by Joanna Cepuchowicz; design by Jerrod Taylor
I read two books over a three-day period during my semi-vacation in an effort to learn a bit more about the Trump phenomenon. The first was, yes, Hillbilly Elegy by J.D. Vance, a name the author did not assume until his marriage. Vance's family (who mark with pride their association to the famous Hatfield-McCoy feud) emigrated to Ohio but retained an almost mystical connection to the "hollers" in the Kentucky Appalachians whence they sprang. His mother was a drug addict who took up with a parade of different men over the years, and he sought out his biological father, a stranger to him, later in his young life. He was raised largely by his grandmother, a woman who talked like a sailor and was so ornery she once set fire to her husband.
Vance himself escaped his heritage. He joined the Marines for four years as a way of getting to Ohio State University, where he worked so hard he graduated in less than two years; then, improbably, he got himself into Yale Law School. Yet he was so out of place culturally that at a high-level recruiting dinner at Yale Law, he had to retreat to the bathroom to text a friend for an emergency primer about what all the silverware was for, and when they served him sparkling water, he spat it out, thinking something was wrong with it. He had never tasted it before.
Vance makes a case for a "hillbilly diaspora," a term he himself doesn't use. Curiously, I've recently been hearing "-tucky" appended as a suffix to various place-names where poor whites of Scots-Irish descent predominate. A relative recently told me she lives in "Pennsyltucky," for instance (she lives near Pittsburgh). J.D. thinks hillbilly culture permeates the white lower class in many places, noting some commonalities: that they're very loyal to Christianity and read the Bible but don't go to church much (or act very "Christian"); they consider themselves "hardworking" but actually have little capacity for hard work; and despite being fiercely proud, they are hampered by a chronic victim mentality. On hearing that he got into Yale Law, for instance, a friend asked him whether he pretended to be a minority or a liberal to get in. Defeated before they try, is Vance's bootstrapper's verdict.
Although not a Trump supporter himself, he's a conservative who is now friends with many people from the Bush II administration, and has some things to say about why Trump appeals to Americans like the people in his family. However, the positivity of the story is helping the book to appeal to people of all political persuasions.
That story is a classic "Horatio Alger" tale, and it's plenty stirring. The book is dramatic and genuinely uplifting like few I've read lately. It's not sociology, of course, but mainly memoir—or maybe four parts memoir to one part sociology—but the impression I get is of someone honestly struggling to understand the two cultures he straddles, not someone making glib, unsubstantiated talking points for political purposes. Although he's not afraid to blame "hillbilly" culture for its flaws, throughout the book he maintains two distinct attitudes: a deep loyalty and love for his family and his people, and grateful acknowledgement to all those who helped him get where he is now. Both set Hillbilly Elegy apart from other rags-to-success tales.
I wouldn't be at all surprised to hear of J.D. Vance running for office as a Republican in the future—the book does have more than a whiff of the "political origin story" to it. But it also has the feel of a guy coming clean in a big public way because he's tired of hiding his origins, especially given his deep love of his unabashedly hillbilly grandparents.
It's a short but terrific book that will most likely lift your spirits. Here's the link to Amazon, the Book Depository (which doesn't charge for International shipping), and Amazon U.K. Links to other Amazons can be found here.
By the way, the book is currently #1 on the New York Times Best-Seller List in its category, hardcover nonfiction.
The book I read directly after Hillbilly Elegy is The Making of Donald Trump by David Cay Johnston (no relation). Johnston is a hard-core investigative journalist with a long list of credentials. A few things about this one: it was rushed to publication so it can be a part of the political conversation in the run-up to the election; Johnston says as much. His approach, though, is probably at odds with much of what you have read about Trump, because Johnston refrains from name-calling, alarmism, psychological diagnoses, and hysteria, and confines himself just to a hard factual account of the things Trump has done in public over his lifetime—and even then, he sticks to the facts that can be documented (and that will withstand threats of retaliatory lawsuits—Johnston recounts a book and a movie that were both initially suppressed by Trump that way). About the worst name that Johnston calls Trump is "a deceiver," added in an epilogue at the end of the book, by which time it seems decidedly mild. Even when he claims that Trump is one of the least qualified individuals ever to run for president, real reasons are given (for instance, that most of Trump's promises aren't within the powers of a president).
There's also some evidence that Johnston wrote the book meaning for it to serve as a factual primer for other journalists, since he has covered Trump more thoroughly than most.
Although it too is short, this book is as troubling and discouraging as Hillbilly Elegy is inspiring and uplifting. For that reason, I can't say I recommend it, but if you want an account of Trump's career that is "just the facts, ma'am," this might be for you.
Mike
"Open Mike" is the often off-topic editorial page of TOP. It now appears on Wednesdays.
Original contents copyright 2016 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Like what you read?
Join our support campaign or buy something
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Maggie Osterberg: "You just reminded me of one of my peeves: Folks, the thing at the back bottom of your shoe is a 'heel.' It's not a 'heal,' nor do women's shoes have 'high heals.' If you use 'heal,' instead of 'heel,' when describing a shoe, you're a heel. I hope the rest of you found this as healing as I did."
Kalli: "And here I thought this would be about Alec Soth's book Dog Days Bogota."
Mike replies: I have that book too, and I have to say (although I'm reluctant to say) that it's probably my favorite book of his. I find his more serious outings to be flinty and cold somehow. Each time I look at one I'm left with a sort of troubled feeling and I usually wish I'd left it on the shelf.
DB: "Re 'It greats every time!' I see what you did their."
Ben: In the vein of the 'hillbilly diaspora,' I recently read American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America by Colin Woodard. It's an interesting history of the cultural bases of the major North American regions, and discusses the founding and spread of the Appalachian nation.
"And that for who really gets me too. I see it from many, many writers that should know better ;-) "
Mike replies: I see what you did their. (With apologies to DB!)
Marc Rochkind: "I read and very much liked Hillbilly Elegy, shortly after I read Paul Theroux's Deep South, which is a much broader look at the deep South, from an outsider's perspective, but equally rewarding. TOP readers will be interested to note that the photographs in Deep South are by none other than Steve McCurry."
Michael Matthews: "Kudos to TOP's readership for abstaining from the volcanic eruption of wild-eyed comments any mention of politics usually brings these days. Or, to you—for moderating the hell out of the responses.
"As to J.D. Vance's book: some readers might come to the conclusion his chaotic childhood may have led to painting his subject with an overly broad brush. Not so. My 75 years' direct experience tells me he's nailed it."
"he worked so hard he graduated in less than two years".
Shouldn't that read: he worked so hard he graduated in fewer than two years?
The whole less/fewer thing is definitely one I struggle remembering.
Patrick
Posted by: Patrick Perez | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 11:35 AM
>> "The althletes who are coming home from Rio early."
Wait, aLthletes? That's your corrected version?
:-)
Posted by: DB | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 11:39 AM
Hello Mike,
‘…coming home from Rio early." It greats every time!’ Oh dear – ‘grates’, is what you mean.
Greetings, Leslie.
Posted by: Leslie Quagraine | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 12:03 PM
I'm impressed that you can write so well and amusingly before breakfast - so eat heartily, then bring us some more!
TOP has been the center of my photographic universe (since 37th Frame days) and "Open Mike" provides me all the rest I need to know, a one-two "punch" before, during and after MY breakfast :-) It is also handy that Mike has a 3 hour head start!
Posted by: Dave Van de Mark | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 12:03 PM
Hello Mike,
Oh dear, I retract my comment of a couple of minutes ago.
Greats / grates – word play. I 'luvs' it.
Cheers, Leslie.
Posted by: Leslie Quagraine | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 12:06 PM
Here's 2 I just finished:
White Trash, the 400 year untold history of class in America, and Listen, Liberal, by Thomas Frank.
Want to know why the "real" working class is flocking to Donald Trump? That's your book! Frank shows how the fiscal policies of the Clinton and Obama administrations were just more of the same wall-streeters, and that even the Dems don't view "real" working class (i.e. high-school grad factory and warehouse workers), as their constituency: their constituency is the college educated liberal tech-meritocracy.
It was an eye-opener for me. Tells how the Dems philosophy about getting people paid in America is: "...you need to go to college...", and not: ...hey, all the money is still in the system to pay you a good wage, it's just taken by the management class who's now making 8000% of the normal workers pay instead of 200%, we've got to stop that..."
Posted by: Tom Kwas | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 12:08 PM
I found, picking up the habit of simply going through a writing and deleting about 70% of the use of the word "that" is one of the greatest steps toward improved writing. Aside from misuse, it is a horribly overused word.
Posted by: Wayne | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 12:13 PM
Ugh. "That" for "who." Kills me. Just saw "pairs down" recently too.
Posted by: SF Murph | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 12:42 PM
My least favorite example of using speech words in place of writing words: that for who.
Oh, am I ever with you on this one! I was beginning to wonder if I was the last holdout - glad to know there's at least two of us ;)
Cheers!
Dan
Posted by: Dan Gorman | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 12:45 PM
I hear that Donald Trump is going to ban shredded cheese. He wants to make America grate again.
Posted by: John McMillin | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 01:34 PM
I heard him speak recently, and he was repeating the same mantra that Trump was the one and only "alternative" candidate out there who was listening to and speaking for the common, working man. And that is such an obvious and bogus crock writ large- as if Trump could care the slightest anything about the plight of any working class man alive, a man born with a silver spoon in his mouth who has made his entire career by stiffing working class stiffs.
There was an alternative candidate this year who was listening to and fighting for working class people, his name was Bernie Sanders. And J.D.'s people and many more like them refused to even acknowledge Sanders because (Egads!) he's a Democratic Socialist, or (most likely) because he's a... Jew.
So smart as he is, ain't buying J.D.'s rather tired, evasive and inaccurate explanation.
Posted by: Stan B. | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 01:36 PM
Althletes? Ouch. Use your spelling skills, T.O.P. :-p
[That's not spelling skills, that's typing skills. I'm an atrocious typist. --Mike]
Posted by: Paul | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 01:42 PM
...from whence they sprang.
Whence means from where, so saying from whence is like saying from from where.
Sorry Mike, it greats [sic] me when people misuse whence :-)
Myriad is another oft misused word that I get unreasonably upset about.
Posted by: Miserere | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 01:52 PM
I thought the dog days were named as a reference to canicula (dog in Latin), when the sun is near Canis Major constellation, i.e. in summer...
Posted by: Olivier | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 02:19 PM
Nothing you can possibly read will fill you with more righteous anger than David Cay Johnston's "Perfectly Legal," "Free Lunch" and "The Fine Print." Nothing. You have been warned.
Posted by: Paul De Zan | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 02:38 PM
"in the summer where it is so hot" - Actually it may not be entirely wrong to use "where" in this case. Some locations have summers where it doesn't get hot enough to cause dogs to feel uncomfortable, let alone go crazy.
Posted by: Gordon Keating-Brown | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 03:12 PM
What I find irritating is use of a modifier with unique as in "very unique" or "somewhat unique". If unique means one of a kind how can there be degrees of uniqueness?
Posted by: bill lewis | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 03:16 PM
White Trash is by Nancy Isenberg. A very informative book about the history of class (gasp!) in the good old US of A..
Posted by: Bob Curtis | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 04:04 PM
My favorites -- "Alternative" when "alternate" will do; "key issue": it's either "key" or an "issue".
Posted by: Dave New | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 05:11 PM
For an interesting and broad look at Scots-Irish in America, look at this post on Slate Star Codex:
http://slatestarcodex.com/2016/04/27/book-review-albions-seed/
Warning: Like most of his posts, it's long.
[That's so interesting. The Johnstons were "Borderers," part D. And it's funny, as I was reading "Hillbilly Elegy," certain small things did sound familiar related to my family, going back. But then, my maternal grandmother's family were all Quakers. --Mike]
Posted by: Tom Passin | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 05:40 PM
The writer you really need to read, Mike (and others who want to understand what goes on in the Appalachians and how the Republicans gull the poor whites into voting for them, against their own interests) is Joe Bageant. You can sample his work at http://joebageant.net/ and find really solid reads in his books: "Deer Hunting with Jesus, Dispatches from America's class war" and "Rainbow Pie, A Redneck Memoir". If you are in Australia, like I am, you can readily get your hands on "Waltzing at the Doomsday Ball: The Best of Joe Bageant" but while published here, no American publisher has picked it up -- which should tell you something. Joe, who sadly died in 2011 leaving a great legacy in his books and writing on the internet, also "escaped" his redneck fate by joining the army, serving in Vietnam, then going to college on the back of that. He became a journalist. Later in life, he returned to his birthplace, Winchester, Virginia. His writing is entertaining, his observations are acute and devastating, presented in powerful word pictures of the reality of life at the bottom socio-economic level today -- the life he was living painted on an historical canvas.
Cheers, Geoff
Posted by: Geoffrey Heard | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 06:16 PM
Trump can't speak for the working class because he doesn't know anything about the working class, but he's become an avatar for the anger he senses out there -- like most good demagogues, you don't need to be it, to sense it. And IMHO, there is a good deal of righteous anger out there, that can be attributed to the failures of the political class. That doesn't excuse Trump's demagoguery, his racism, his foolishness, his lack of curiosity about the world, or his obvious and pathological narcissism, but it might help explain his success, such as it has been so far.
Posted by: John Camp | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 06:50 PM
My pet peeve and the most common mistake I notice in writing is the use of loose instead of lose. In conversation it's also common for people to say I could of done that instead of I could have done that. Where for when, that for who, the list goes on, as does the increase in illiteracy!
Posted by: Kefyn Moss | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 07:32 PM
Seeing that the subject is books, I thought this might be of interest: http://www.wsj.com/articles/ordinary-people-1446073433
It even has photographs!
Posted by: Luis Aribe | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 08:05 PM
"Pennsyltucky" derives from the 1960s TV cartoon "The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle". You might also look at "Albion's Seed", by David Hackett Fischer. It's a detailed look at what kinds of people, from four separate regions of England, settled the colonies. The Scotch-Irish who became the 'hillbillies' are just one of those.
Posted by: Mark Sampson | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 08:45 PM
Hi Mike,
I noticed Ben's comment on 'that versus who'. It seems to be a common way these days.
Interesting article on that very point is found here:
http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/who-versus-that
cheers from Australia
Posted by: Willie | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 08:55 PM
The key to understanding the rise of Donald Trump is to simply understand the rise of Hillary Clinton. Most folks, educated or not, are very hard to move from their norm.....And for many Americans the norm is to stick with the "go along to get along" way of life: "Pap was a Democrat and so am I." Personally, I think Donald Trump might have been even more successful campaigning as a Democrat. Sure, he would have had to switch his position on many of the issues, but his style, e.g. "They want to kill your grandmother with dirty water and dirty air" is textbook Dem/Liberal.
It is possible Trump will close the gap and win this thing; if he does, it will be because the "hillbilly diaspora," something that normally works for Democrats, might pull to the Republican side.
So to understand Trump, Just look at the way the other side rants and raves against him. Two peas in a pod.
Posted by: Wayne | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 09:48 PM
This short article describes the best study yet that I've seen on who are Trump supporters: https://psmag.com/a-clearer-portrait-emerges-of-trump-supporters
Hint: "Pennsyltucky" is never mentioned.
Posted by: wts | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 10:04 PM
JD Vance was on the NYT podcast "The Run Up" for the recent episode, "Trump's America".
Frankly he lost a sale, he was too much Yale.
"Folks" may enjoy my photos from the most recent Trump rallies at the top of my website.
Posted by: Frank Petronio | Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 11:34 PM
“When I am dead, I hope it may be said: "His sins were scarlet, but his books were read.”
― Hilaire Belloc
Posted by: Pritam Singh | Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 02:28 AM
Two interesting topics: Appalachia and Trump. I'll try to keep it very short, as I could write forever
Being born and mostly raised in West Virginia, I am glad to see that recently some people have become interested in that area and the people (at least the white men) of the region. Perhaps it will finally kill the prejudiced and ignorant stereotypes we WV/Appalacian "hillbillies" have had to put up with.
Unfortunately, I am not so sure that will happen though. I was born to working class parents who came from working class parents, and for some odd reason they were not lazy, were not stupid, were not drunks, or drug addicts, or spouse abusers. We hunted, we had firearms, but somehow never shot anyone. Never even dreamed of it. I knew/know very few who matched the stereotype, but when I read newspaper reports or watch some TV reports about the area, the inevitable ignorant, uneducated stereotype always seems to get interviewed. And yeehaw, no matter what, we gotta have a photo someone holding his deer rifle even though it ain't deer season and has nothing to do with the story. (See the Aug 19 NYT "Alienated and Angry.")
Trump and the GOP aren't tricking anyone that I know there. They know Trump can't do half of what he says. He is popular among some for many reasons, but a big one is because he is the anti-politician. He is a middle finger to the elite DC crowd. And nobody there over the age of 40 is going to believe that either political party--esp the Democrats---is anything other than crooked. Literally so. Oughta hear my parents tell stories about the Democrats of old. Republicans fare little better, but they haven't the long history of the Democrats there. Neither actually give a flying flimflam about the working class and everyone knows it.
But isn't it odd today, that so many have to read a book to know anything about working class people.
As far as the David Johnston book, I am happy to see a serious reporter do that, even if it is rushed. Someone basing his reporting on facts not bizarre Putin conspiracies or absurd shouting about Second Amendment supporter assassination threats.
(And no, I do not support Trump.)
[The best appraisal of American politics I ever heard was offered many years ago by Robert Kennedy Jr. on "The Tonight Show," of all things. He said something to the effect that the Republicans are 95% corrupt, but the Democrats are 75% corrupt. --Mike]
Posted by: D. Hufford. | Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 09:20 AM
I'm so glad I don't have to learn English as a second language.
Posted by: Jerry | Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 11:15 AM
Thanks for the book recommendations. I'm already on page 103 of Hillbilly Elegy and I'm enjoying using Google Street View to see the neighborhoods discussed in the book. Mamaw's house is located at 313 McKinley Street, Middletown, Ohio.
Posted by: David Raboin | Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 11:16 AM
""Pennsyltucky" derives from the 1960s TV cartoon "The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle". And it is what the main character in Orange is the New Black calls the white trash character in this popular TV series. Might explain the recent rise in popularity of that and similar terms.
Posted by: Peter Barnes | Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 11:17 AM
As someone who/that worked on Capitol Hill for 21 years and many years as a community activist I do not believe politicians are any more "crooked" than the people they serve. The American people are just "crooked" in different ways than politicians.
We can all argue about this election from so many points of view but I believe that until we get money out of politics discontent with the political system will continue.
Posted by: Jerry | Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 11:29 AM
I've recently been hearing "-tucky" appended as a suffix to various place-names where poor whites of Scots-Irish descent predominate.
Belftucky?
Londontucky?
Newtowntucky?
All in Ulstertucky where the Scots-Irish originated.
The old school version of protestantism in Northern Ireland seems to match with all of traits that follow that sentence. Is there something cultural that links both groups? Authoritarian Scottish Protestantism, perhaps? That particular brand of hellfire Presbyterianism or Calvinism mixed with authoritarianism to make people conform so independent thought isn't valued? Is there self-selection involved too? Do the "non-hillbilly" Hillbillies move away and not be Hillbillies anymore?
Don't get me wrong. Every person I've met from NornIron I've really liked but they all had in common that they left the place (and none were interested in divisive politics).
e.g. https://youtu.be/THiV_Wa3Lz4?t=2m19s
BTW, that "sermon" (which one could imagine Ian Paisley delivering) is rooted in a wonderful archeological practical joke/fakery from the 1950s.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3262916?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
https://books.google.com/books?id=kRrJqFKU6N8C&pg=PA79#v=onepage&q&f=false
On the other hand the excellent Australian TV comedy "Upper Middle Bogan" (on Netflix) is being picked up for a US remake. Perhaps they'll call it "Upper Middle Hillbilly" as "Upper Middle Redneck" or "Upper Middle White Trash" just wouldn't work the same way.
It could extend the favorable representation of Hillbillies on TV ("The Beverly Hillbillies" running rings around the "smart folks" in LA) as the show looks favorably on the Bogan stereotype which has undergone a change from pejorative putdown to "authentic Australian" in the past decade or so.
I note (with some amusement) that the some are deprecating the term Hillbilly in favor of "American of Appalachian/Ozark heritage" but "Upper Middle American of Appalachian Heritage" doesn't really work either.
Posted by: Kevin Purcell | Friday, 26 August 2016 at 06:49 PM
Apropos read (present) and read (past), I'm chafing about the increasing use of lead as the past tense. I will lead; I led is the way I've always known it. Illogical, but ... What say you?
Posted by: Peter Croft | Sunday, 28 August 2016 at 01:36 AM