I'm far from an expert in aerial photography, but I just wanted to add one small comment to the previous post: having one aerial photograph in your portfolio can be a real plus for you, and I recommend it. For many years I've had just one single aerial photo in mine*, but people almost always linger over it and ask about it.
In general, photographers want their portfolios to say "I'll do anything," and that's usually a mistake. (Have I written a post yet about why you should never have one wedding photograph in your portfolio? If I haven't, I've been meaning to.) Your portfolio should target a specific clientele and work to convince that clientele that you're the absolute best person for the job at hand—it shouldn't be a hodgepodge of jobber work of various kinds. However, having a token aerial shot might well be the exception to that rule. It really does say to clients "I can do anything" in a meaningful way. Generally, amateur photographers who do casual pro work once in a while aren't trusted with the budget for a plane or a helicopter. An aerial implies that you were trusted with just such a important job—even if you weren't!
Adding one aerial shot to your portfolio isn't as hard as it sounds. You might have a friend who flies. Small planes and helicopters can be rented for not that much money. And there are even things like biplane rides at air shows and tethered hot air balloon rides that can get you way up in the air for very little inconvenience or expense. Best of all, while it's just as hard to get a great aerial shot as it is to get any other kind of great picture, getting a good one is fairly easy...lots of things look more interesting from high above, as most of us know from peering out the window of a descending airliner when the air is clear and the light is nice.
A shot not many of us could get: Door Gunner Looks at Baghdad, by John Camp
Anyway, I highly recommend adding an aerial shot to your general portfolio. It's unlikely to get you any work shooting them, but it says good things about you all the same.
*I'd show it to you if my darned scanner worked, but oh well.
Featured Comment by Dave: "As a former flight instructor I can tell you that if show up at your local airport, a flight instructor will be happy to help you take aerial photos. Most flight instructors will do just about anything to log additional flight time. A photo flight is considered a cherry assignment for a starving flight instructor. It beats teaching someone how to land.
"Some tips to get the most out of your photo flight:
1) Plan ahead—an hour of flight time will cost from $60–$120. You'll not want to waste a minute. Spend at least an hour with your pilot planning the photo mission. The pilot will need to have a plan for navigating to the photo site and dealing with local air traffic control.
2) Schedule to fly during good lighting conditions. Early morning or late afternoon.
3) Get some latitude and longitude info from google maps. Most aircraft are now equipped with GPS. If you come prepared with lat and long data you'll save the pilot a lot of work and possible wasted flight time.
4) Ask if you can fly the plane. A flight instructor won't mind handing the controls over for awhile and teaching you some turns or something more exciting if you're brave."
Featured Comment by Steve Renwick: "As a Cessna driver, I'd like to add a few comments.
"Make sure that you and the pilot are on the same page at all times, i.e., you both know how low the plane will fly, you ask before opening the window, etc. Never surprise the pilot.
"If you are not accustomed to small planes, it would be a really good idea to take a ride without your camera at first, just so you know what to expect.
"As somebody else said, looking through the viewfinder whilst going in circles is a very good way to upset your stomach. Don't try to tough it out, as that won't work. Look up at the horizon and ask the pilot to fly straight and level for a while. A little delay is better than the alternative."
Featured Comment by Stan Semuskie: "I agree with your comment about the aerial photo in your portfolio. A couple years ago I received a call from Forbes.com to shoot a photo of the home of one of the richest guys in the U.S. I was kind of taken aback by the request, and asked if the person would set up the shoot. She said just rent a plane or helicopter, find the house and take a picture. I still wasn't convinced that I could do it so I called the local airport, in Hillsboro, Oregon, and much to my surprise I could rent a helicopter with a pilot for $125/hr, and they would only charge me for what I used in 6-minute increments. I did the job, used up the whole hour and shot much more than the house—I also shot my company, my house, and all my friends' houses from the air. It was one of the best experiences I have had.
"By the way, the person whose house I shot was Phil Knight (founder of Nike). He just happened to live in my town of Hillsboro, and I was lucky enough to get the job from Forbes. I would recommend anyone to call around and see what it costs for an hour of air time. I think many will be very much surprised at how inexpensive it can be."
Take a picture of it!
Posted by: Paul McEvoy | Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 05:09 PM
Mike, and what if we don't want to specialise? For instance, I love shooting rock concerts, but wouldn't want to limit myself just to them. I like shooting cities, even if it's more architecture than people. I like nature. I like animals. And I like casual portraits without artificial light.
(Hidden agenda: I'm just reorganising and redesigning my site... And my aerials are really not up to it. :-))
Posted by: erlik | Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 05:36 PM
"Best of all, while it's just as hard to get a great aerial shot as it is to get any other kind of great picture,". Mike, you're spot on, as usual.
As an aerial photographer down under here in Australia, I learn something every time I fly. Things to consider include the weather, air traffic control restrictions, the weather, having a pilot and aircraft available at call, putting up with hanging out in 100 knot slipstream at 2 degrees Celsius with the door off while pointing the camera straight down in a steep turn, (not often, admittedly), framing the shot exactly, taping the camera so no settings get changed, communication with a pilot who knows what he or she is doing, and did I mention the weather?? It's a challenge to get GREAT photos, but most times the clients don't realise what's involved. And the float fee for helicopters is prohibitive in most shoots I do. Cessna 172/182 with doors off are wonderful, but the ultimate, but extremely slow platform is a "Drifter" ultralight. Just my two cents.
Posted by: Bruce | Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 06:12 PM
funny timing...
i was reading this post and looked up to the TV where I was indulging myself by watching a few minutes of Harold and Maude on TCM just as the aerial view of the cemetery came on. First time I have watched it since I saw it at the movies in '71. I suppose this movie could serve as the one movie on the movie shelf that would lead a visitor to say "I can watch anything"
it won't get you recognition but it says good things about you just the same.
Have some fun today Mike,
dale
Posted by: dale | Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 07:03 PM
I fully agree Mike, with the no wedding photos, and that one aerial will get attention. This shot was from a two man ultralight. I was not the pilot, as it is better to get the shot than lose the life.
http://onlinegalleries.com.au/users/LakeCountryPhotos/
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 07:04 PM
*I'd show it to you if my darned scanner worked, but oh well.
It's not really my business to tell you your business, but folks have been known to stoop so low as taking a photo of a photo with little ill effect - especially considering the web as target.
Just sayin'
Posted by: Gary Filkins | Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 07:35 PM
Mike was either kind, impressed or foolish enough to run some aerials of mine on TOP a few months ago. Even though I don't shoot professionally, that feature is a fabulous calling card for me, helping con the innocent into accepting me as a somewhat serious photographer. Yes, TOP provides street cred.
If you are looking for a photo flight opportunity, keep in mind that a lot of private pilots are also into photography and more often than not they fly high-wing Cessnas. Also, many, many pleasure pilots are constantly on the lookout for that elusive Reason to Go Flying, something other that the humdrum $100 Hamburger Flight (which is more like $200 these days). A little networking might find you a share-the-cost deal with a pilot/shutterbug, probably costing you under a hundred bucks for an hour or so.
Posted by: Paul De Zan | Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 07:42 PM
Mike, I have a friend who has a Cessna and has offered many times to take me up. However, I'm scared to death of small planes. Several years ago he related how the engine had blown up over the beach and he glided the plane back to the airport with all sorts of emergency vehicles waiting for him to crash. This incident did nothing for my confidence and I have managed all sorts of excuses to avoid having to fly with him. Portfolio be damned.
Posted by: John Brewton | Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 08:03 PM
Here in Madison you can get a flight in a Cessna 172 for $75/hr; or at least that's what it was about 3 years ago. Hard to imagine it could get any cheaper than that.
Posted by: Evan Murdock | Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 08:44 PM
Just a comment about 'trying to show everything' in a portfolio - Zack Arias' blog (www.zarias.com) has a series of excellent video critiques of website portfolios submitted by readers. He really stresses the need to keep a portfolio focussed and targeted to specific work/clients etc. But of course I'd like to hear your take on it as well, Mike!
Posted by: Nick D | Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 09:28 PM
Actually, the ultimate aerial camera platform is the Drifter's big brother:
http://www.aircam.com/
It was originally designed for a National Geographic photo mission over inaccessible terrain, where rescue would be unlikely if you went down. 40 MPH over anything in near-perfect safety; I have one under construction. Yes, I'm insane.
Posted by: Paul De Zan | Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 11:51 PM
This may be cheating but I've taken some nice shots by simply standing on balconies of multi-story buildings. Most of us rarely get to stand somewhere and look straight down more than maybe twenty feet at best. The view of a parking lot from eight stories above can be interesting.
Posted by: B Grace | Wednesday, 15 July 2009 at 12:04 AM
My fear of flying is such that no amount of in-body or lens stabilization will compensate for the blur-fest that would result. 'Impressionist aerial' as a sub-genre?
Posted by: James McDermott | Wednesday, 15 July 2009 at 12:11 AM
Of course an airbus A320 isn't bad either
Posted by: hugh crawford | Wednesday, 15 July 2009 at 04:56 AM
To Paul De Zan.. Wow.. what a platform. Speed and that ability to shoot left and right at the same time. Luxury, I want one, but $US90K is just beyond my budget. I envy you guys who can get a Cessna for less than $125/hr.
Posted by: Bruce | Wednesday, 15 July 2009 at 06:55 AM
Or you could just pay attention while you're flying coach:
http://frankpetronio.com/archive/its_a_cross_country.html
Posted by: Frank P. | Wednesday, 15 July 2009 at 07:33 AM
I've a little experience of aerial photography - what I've learned:
1 - space in small planes and helicopters is, well small. Smaller than you think if you start trying to twist around for a shot or try and use anything longer than a standard lens.
2 - if you can't open a window, forget it.
3 - beware IS. I have a pretty good stomach in the air and on sea, but when the IS kicks in and makes everything look stable, while my body is telling me something else - that's when the problem's start!
4 - best photo platform I've been in is a hot air balloon. Great view, can be quite low, no slipstream, and great fun. As most balloon flights take place early or late in the day, the light is at its best as well.
Of course a balloon is not much good if you want a specific picture (unless you are very lucky).
For those who are nervous/terrified flyers, a balloon is the way to go - it really doesn't feel like flying. Its more like going up in a lift and watch the world move underneath you.
Balloon flights aren't cheap, but I've yet to meet anyone who didn't think the experience was worth every penny - the photography is an added bonus.
Cheers,
Colin
Posted by: Colin Work | Wednesday, 15 July 2009 at 08:21 AM
This is my aerial shot. I have a private license, VFR and was in a Cessna 152, N757GX. I used Ektachrome Aero, 135mm, 25A filter. This is of the north Grand Island bridges, in upstate NY:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ubereye/2583557796/
Posted by: misha | Wednesday, 15 July 2009 at 12:35 PM
>I want one, but $US90K is just beyond my budget.
Ahh...how wonderful if it really cost $90K! The real cost to completion is a fair bit higher, but a new C172 is more than twice the price. That's the sort of thing I tell myself when nagging concepts like "fiscal responsibility" punch their way into my mind.
Posted by: Paul De Zan | Wednesday, 15 July 2009 at 03:08 PM