I almost forgot! I don't mean to overdo the archive thing, but the man is 200 today. Apropos.
Mike
|-- removed generator -->
« From the Archives: 'All Lens Tests are Wrong' | Main | Notes and Rumors »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Silly me, I thought it might be Darwin.
Posted by: Ken White | Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 09:13 PM
Nice to read that, as I'm a "student" of Mr. Lincoln. I've often thought he wasn't "human", but increasingly I see the man, but also an extraordinary humanity.
Bron
Posted by: Bron Janulis | Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 10:03 PM
Ken,
52 years on Earth and I've *never heard* that Lincoln and Darwin were born on the same day. You really do learn something new every day....
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 10:07 PM
Ken White beat me to it, but there are 'classic' portraits here, too:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/science/evolution/4599235/Charles-Darwin-The-man-behind-the-theory-of-evolution.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin
Posted by: Gary K Froehlich | Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 11:27 PM
Heh, thought it was Darwin too.
Posted by: Janne | Friday, 13 February 2009 at 12:16 AM
I posted this on the original post, but again... this is a revelation.
I can't help but think Timothy Greenfield-Sanders when I see this. Single broad light, gray background, eyes into the camera. Somehow it's proof that the basics never go out of style.
Posted by: ben syverson | Friday, 13 February 2009 at 12:35 AM
I couldn't recall you ever posting a photograph of Darwin so I went for Lincoln. I didn't know they were born on the same day until now
Darwin
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/Charles_Darwin_in_1855.jpg
Posted by: Sean | Friday, 13 February 2009 at 05:57 AM