[UPDATE the following morning: That was interesting—the information in the post below, which I wrote yesterday using information from Sigma's and B&H's websites, is now obsolete and no longer correct. Literally overnight, not only have some of B&H Photo's listings for some of the I-Series Contemporary lenses changed, but Sigma's own web page for those lenses has changed as well. Sigma no longer includes the DG DN lenses on the Contemporary lenses page, but has added them to the "Discontinued" page. (It's also possible my search yesterday turned up an outdated page.) And several of the lenses I said were still available at the old prices at B&H Photo are no longer listed or are now listed as "Discontinued." It looks like the 65mm lens is the only one still available in L-mount at the old price. But I didn't check them all. Several of the older DG DN lenses look to still be available in Sony E mount at the old prices also.
A couple of things I missed: the 45mm ƒ/2.8 DG (new style) (now $619, vs. the old price of $449) does feature a change: it now takes the magnetic lenscap used across the rest of the line, according to DPReview. And the obvious one: these lenses are now available in silver versions, to match the silver BF. —Mike]
I shoot Sigma L-mount now, and the other day I noticed something that outwardly looked weird. Some of the Contemporary series of lenses seemed to have a subtly new designation—the older lenses were "DG DN" and the newer lenses are just "DG." Not just on the sale pages; the change is also printed on the lenses themselves.
(Note: These illustrations show just the lower
part of the lens, not the whole lens)
This is the older and newer Contemporary 35mm ƒ/2. Note the printed lens designations.
Then I noticed something else weird. On the Sigma page for the lenses, both versions are listed and illustrated, but they don't seem to be right next to each other. For example, this 35mm ƒ/2 DG DN is in the middle of one row and plain DG is at the beginning of the next row down. The 24mm ƒ/3.5 has three lenses in between the DG DN and the DG.
In Sigma-speak, DG is a lens for full-frame, and DN signifies (sigmafies?) a lens for mirrorless. So why did the "DN" disappear?
I know, the suspense it killing you, so I'll cut to the chase. The old and new lenses are exactly the same. No changes. The new lenses are every bit as much for mirrorless as the original DN-marked lenses are.
Then...oh, duh. A number of the "new" DG-only lenses are more expensive. So do you suppose they put the lenses on the company web page farther away from each other to make it less likely that you'd compare the prices? Or does that sound like a TOP conspiracy theory?
The ones that have gone up in price are the 17mm ƒ/4, 24mm ƒ/3.5, 24mm ƒ/2, 35mm ƒ/2, and 65mm ƒ/2.
The ones that have stayed at the same price are the 20mm ƒ/2, 45mm ƒ/2.8, 50mm ƒ/2, and 90mm ƒ/2.8.
It appears that none of the Contemporary zoom lenses are yet available in a DG-only version.
Should you be interested in snagging something at the old "DG DN" price, B&H Photo still has a couple of the DG DN marked lenses that look like they're based on the lower price: the 17mm ƒ/4 DG DN, L-mount, $599 (same as Sigma list price) and the 65mm ƒ/2 DG DN, L-mount, $599 ($100 less than the Sigma list price for the old one; the new one is $769). The others are discontinued at the former prices. The 65mm has particularly nice bokeh if you're all right with the only mildly longer angle of view.
All those prices are for L-mount. Sony E-mount lenses might be different prices. Some look to be more, some less.
I really like this lens series. They have all-metal casings and very smooth operation, and metal lens hoods, even, and their performance is beyond reproach, at least the two I've tried. I've been meaning to buy a 90mm. Now is probably the time. [UPDATE: too late.]
Mike
Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)
Featured Comments from:
Jim Kofron (partial comment): "Sigma did announce a price increase due to the tariffs. I have a 90mm on backorder from B&H; I think it's supposed to come in September. I doubt that they will 'give it' to me for the original backorder price. The new I-series lenses were all getting the makeover (with magnetic caps, etc). I have a new 45mm and an older 17mm (both for my black Sigma BF). As for the Sigma BF, I'm really enjoying that camera. I've never had a Sigma that was so fast and rock-solid on autofocus—it's quite a treat!"
Tariffs
Posted by: Terry Letton | Thursday, 24 July 2025 at 06:21 PM
DPReview explains the change…
https://m.dpreview.com/news/2104506847/sigma-says-goodbye-to-dslr-lens-development
[Yeah but DPReview stated then that "prices for all nine lenses remain unchanged" and while that might have been true last February, it's not true today. —Mike]
Posted by: Jeff | Thursday, 24 July 2025 at 06:31 PM
You got me a bit excited with the photo of that pancake lens...
Posted by: David | Thursday, 24 July 2025 at 08:09 PM
IIRC, they just changed their typography, so perhaps this was done at that time and will affect lenses produced as of the switchover date? I assume the newer lenses prices reflect the 10% tariff increase they made, so buy that 90mm now, before the 15% tariffs go into effect. So those "old" styles lenses may just be "New Old Stock". Of course, the tariffs will have no effect on your pocketbook!
Posted by: SWRick | Thursday, 24 July 2025 at 09:36 PM
Anything to bury the effects of tariffs and not be subjected to even more of them.
Posted by: Sal Santamaura | Thursday, 24 July 2025 at 09:40 PM
Here’s a theory: Perhaps the newer, DG-only lenses are those brought into the U.S. after the revised tariff regime. The DN lenses might have been in U.S. warehouses before things changed. The higher pricing on the newer lenses would seem to support my theory but who knows? Final thought on this: Perhaps the DG-only lenses have a different country of manufacture.
Posted by: Steve Biro | Thursday, 24 July 2025 at 09:41 PM
This seems to be a price increase specific for the US. I recently bought the new 45 2.8 when it became available in Sweden where I live. The cost was the same as the previous version. When I checked the pricing on Sigma's page all "new" lenses remain at the previous price level. The same thing in Germany and Canada, although I only found the 17, 35 and 65 on the Canadian site.
I would guess this is due to tariffs. The Canadian dollar has lost in valuation similar to the USD so I do not think that is the cause. But it is strange that it does not apply to all new lenses then.
Posted by: Viktor H | Friday, 25 July 2025 at 04:02 AM
Prices have really gone up - I bought a Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 DC DN as a walk around lens for my Sony a6600 for $550 three years ago. That same lens today is $660. Great little lens by the way. I’d buy it even at a higher price, but I’m glad I got it when I did.
https://pixelfed.social/p/paulrcoen/597404009212033317
https://pixelfed.social/p/paulrcoen/719528889325493776
https://pixelfed.social/p/paulrcoen/701415748773260336
Posted by: Paul C | Friday, 25 July 2025 at 08:01 AM
You wrote: “Yeah but DPReview stated then that "prices for all nine lenses remain unchanged" and while that might have been true last February, it's not true today. —Mike]”
Well, they explained why the name changed, which was one of your questions. You’re welcome.
Prices do tend to go up on things these days, on darn near everything.
Posted by: Jeff | Friday, 25 July 2025 at 10:11 AM
The Sigma UK website has a similar difference in price between DG DN lenses and the DG lenses so nothing to do with the Trump imposed tariff into the USA.
The Art series lenses do not appear to be affected and neither are the DC (APS-C) lenses
Posted by: James Ito | Friday, 25 July 2025 at 10:40 AM
"...does feature a change: it now takes the magnetic lenscap..."
I wonder if anyone did testing on the effects of this magnetic cap (which I assume must be pretty strong to assure that it doesn't fall off easily) when placed in close proximity to memory cards? I never had a problem squeezing two tabs to get my caps on or off. Magnetic caps seem like a fix to something that wasn't broke.
Posted by: Albert Smith | Friday, 25 July 2025 at 11:26 AM
It seems like the old DG DN lenses are disappearing, at least for Canon EF mount. I am sad to see them go. They were revolutionary! They showed that a 3rd party lens manufacturer could go toe-to-toe with Canon and beat them. They changed the way Canon made lenses. The current Canon RF L behemoths are a direct response to Sigma's DG DN lenses. Canon's insistence on the closed RF mount seems to be a direct response as well. Those Sigma lenses were that good!
Posted by: Dillan | Friday, 25 July 2025 at 05:28 PM
In Austria, the 45 2.8 DG DN is listed as always at € 549 on Sigma‘s website and various stores.
So this really seems to be a US tariff effect.
Posted by: Georg | Friday, 25 July 2025 at 05:56 PM
Albert,
I'm missing half a thumb, so I really like the magnetic lens cap (I know that I'm an edge case). It's useless with the lens shade on (you can only grab it at the edges)--but they do pack both style lens caps in the box.
Posted by: Jim Kofron | Friday, 25 July 2025 at 06:45 PM
Another (v little) Sigma lens mystery: their APS-C lenses all seem to come out in L-mount versions -- when was the last L-mount APS-C camera made? Is one due any time?
Posted by: Danny Roberts | Saturday, 26 July 2025 at 04:21 AM
I don't know about other cameras, but the Leica SL2 switches the sensor to APS-C mode when you mount such a lens.
As Sigma are producing APS-C lenses for other mounts (e.g. Fuji-X) perhaps not a lot of bother to make the same lenses with an L mount
Posted by: James Ito | Tuesday, 29 July 2025 at 09:35 AM