...Must really concentrate the mind. Here's a nice video about a thoughtful young photographer from Los Angeles, Paloma Dooley, who is going her own way. I like the independence of thought it takes to shoot 8x10-inch film in the age of the Sony A-1, and it tickled me that she considers two exposures per month to be heavy shooting. Imagine how clear her explanations of the technical part of the work would be to a beginner or to someone who doesn't yet know about large format, and note how articulate and free of artspeak her explanations are about her thinking on the subject of land and its uses, the ways we divide it up. She touches on that near the end of the video. Knowing that, you can see what attracted her in a number of the photographs. The pictures are not made to be pretty, which I liked once I started to understand what she's up to in her work.
"Whenever and wherever we work against the landscape’s tendencies, we inadvertently flag our own vulnerabilities: any intervention made in the landscape becomes a physical marker of a danger that we are trying to outsmart." She's articulate. And yet the pictures are more so, on exactly the same topics*. You do have to look at them carefully, while being mindful of her concerns. Note the one at her website in which the central subject seems to be a tiny McDonald's sign way in the distance.
It's difficult to talk about specific pictures because they're not labeled within the slideshows at her website, but there are some terrific standout images too: my favorite, the one of the ladder against the half-chopped-down tree in "Edges / Passageways" (the same scene is in the background of the towel on the clothesline in "What it Feels Like to be a Beautiful Rectangle"), the dizzying layering of the "KLEK" tunnel, also in "Edges / Passageways," the white fence in "Plain Sight."
Pool shot
A photograph of Bodie I've never seen before? Nice to know some of those are still out there. At this link is "Empty Pockets" by Will Gibson, a onetime professional photographer whose career eventually revolved into teaching photography at Palomar and UCSD in California. To enlarge, click in the upper left hand corner. The larger version looks better on my monitor at least.
Do an image search for "pool table at Bodie" and you'll see many more shots of the same motif, but Will's is different.
Bodie, as you might know, is a State Historic Park east of the Sierra Nevada mountains near the California-Nevada border. It's a former gold mining town that is now maintained as a ghost town in a state of "arrested decay," although of course the old buildings, which represent about a tenth of the original buildings of the town, are continuing to deteriorate, especially in the mountain winters. Bodie is also a treasured National Cliché Landmark for photographers, like the slot canyons, Horseshoe Bend, the Flatiron Building, or Ranchos de Taos. They're serious about the maintenance efforts at Bodie: there are no gas stations or food courts there, drone flyovers are not permitted, and you're not allowed to touch anything, or, especially, take anything—even rocks off the ground. Obviously someone disobeyed the no-touching rule at some point before Will photographed this old three-cushion table. Against the rules; but the "dust shadow" of the cue (not que) is what makes the photograph.
There's lots to look at at his website, too. I had a nice hour perusing it.
Three-cushion billiards, a.k.a. carom billiards, an esoteric game played with three balls on a table without pockets, is a truly strange anomaly. It was once hugely popular in the United States—match results were breathlessly reported on the front pages of newspapers—yet today it is almost entirely forgotten. Here's a link to a match if you want to see how it's played. To score a point you must hit three cushions and both of the other balls; the average scoring of tournament-level play is just 1.5 per visit to the table, making high runs like the extraordinary one at the link very rare. Just watch the overhead view of Caudron's first shot at the link (he's the second man to the table in the video, after the first guy misses) to get a sense of the insane difficulty of the game. Note also the packed crowd. It's totally weird that this was once a mainstream public sport. To the point that there would even be a three-cushion table in a saloon in a Sierra Nevada gold-mining town.
Did I just sneak in a bit of writing about billiards? Can't be; I never do that here. Bodie has long been catnip for western photographers, and I'll say no more about that.
Both of these—the video about Paloma's work and the single image by Will—were suggested by readers around the same time. They're very different in very many ways, but, if you think about it, both have to do with human efforts to cope with and control entropy, which was a nice coincidence.
Mike
*Artspeak and the work it purports to describe often do not line up all that well, if we're honest about it.
Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)
Featured Comments from:
Neven Jovanovic: "The first page of the image search for 'pool table at Bodie' suggests that Will Gibson's photo has been taken from a vantage point somewhat higher than usual (and from an angle, and in black and white). Hundreds of ways to look at a blackbird."
[Neven's reference is to "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird" by Wallace Stevens. —Ed.]
David G. Miller: "Paloma Dooley's photographs are a revelation. Her location, her equipment, her age are all utterly different from mine—I am an old guy shooting APS-C on the Canadian prairies, often with panorama framing—but Dooley's images leave me gob-smacked and elated…breathless with wonder. I don't usually bother with videos (much of my life is embodied by stillness) but I watched and listened to the entirety of the one you linked to. I was struck by the total agreement between what she says and what she does. One might describe it as 'integrity,' or more informally comment that 'she's got her act together.' Thanks."
Dave Millier: "Not sure what to make of her work. It is kind of too documentary for my taste. I prefer highly simplified, very carefully composed work that looks highly deliberate and composed (if we are talking American photography, think of something like Pete Turner's 'Trashcan'). Dooley's work seems simultaneously considered and 'loose.' Looseness in composition is something I struggle to warm to but I know from viewing many a photo that you've praised, Mike, that it's your thing. It's a mystery to me to understand how taste is formed and I can't explain why I'm out of kilter with other commenters but out of kilter I am."
Ed Kreminski: "Thank you Paloma! You've rekindled my 8x10 view camera (last camera) fantasy thoughts. I really appreciate your descriptions of what it's like to shoot in the field with equipment folks don't easily recognize. I still drag a heavy tripod around and persist in a location to take a picture longer than folks find normal today. Tripod?—WTF is that? Do folks sidle up next to you with their iPhones to take the 'same' picture that you're working on? LOL. I love that LA light. Your $100 contact print pricing is way too low. Your work is worth 10 times more, easily. I wish you many years of continued photographic success and may the muses of visual arts continue to smile on your efforts! All the best and keep on shooting."
All I can say about her work is WOW! Just wonderful. Stephen Shore on a whole different level. And her contact prints are a great bargain. I shot with an 8x10 very briefly, many years ago, and there is nothing like it. Great find.
Posted by: James Weekes | Friday, 18 April 2025 at 09:06 AM
Paloma Dooley's photography and her explication of it are fantastic. There is a lot of ink spilled these days about the limitations of our youth. Then one comes upon a person like this and realizes much of that is nonsense. Thank you for posting this.
Posted by: Terry Burnes | Friday, 18 April 2025 at 11:36 AM
Here’s a bit of pool and photography: https://youtu.be/vVtjm8Qg24I?si=0rYNY1h_exW2FHWo
Markus is a wet plate photographer. In a previous life he specialized in pool photography.
Posted by: Roger | Friday, 18 April 2025 at 01:37 PM
Re: Paloma Dooley's profile, an excellent call-out, Mike. Free of arty pretense...speaking plainly about her motivations and choices. The kind of person you'd like to spend time with. With respect to her sensibilities I'd call her a kind of early mixture between Robert Adams and Mark Power (Magnum).
On a wider-angle, I've been following William Velbeek's YouTube channel for at least a couple of years. I think many TOP readers will find his videos to be very engaging. He's recently begun doing these profile pieces, such as Paloma's, that are presented 100% by the photographer (as opposed to awkward interview style). If you're new to William's channel make sure you have an hour to kill as you begin to peruse his videos.
Posted by: Kenneth Tanaka | Friday, 18 April 2025 at 02:24 PM
the one of the ladder on against the half-chopped-down tree in "What it Feels Like to be a Beautiful Rectangle"
I think that's in Edges/Passageways.
[Thanks. Fixed now. Where the heck is the fact-checker? Taking a nap again, no doubt. --Mike]
Posted by: T Edwards | Friday, 18 April 2025 at 02:56 PM
Thank you for showing Dooley's work. I was not familiar with it and it is great work. You said the work was not made to be pretty, but I think it is beautiful and that helps draw you into the photograph. It is certainly a nice relief from the over saturated, over beautified work that dominants so much of landscape work these days.
Posted by: James Popp | Friday, 18 April 2025 at 02:57 PM
I found the Paloma Dooley landscapes to be interesting. The shot through trees to an urbanscape below (with a McDonalds right in the middle) is somewhat reminiscent of a Cézanne. (It doesn't look like a Cézanne, but it's something that Cézanne might have chosen to paint.)
In documentary photos like these, there's always a tension between beauty and documentation; a lot of her photos include junk, and electric wires, and so on. Ugly stuff. Which is okay for that kind of photo, but I've always found myself somewhat bemused by the modern attitude that rejects simple natural beauty. (Although too much simple natural beauty photography is sadly clichéd.) I'm not a huge fan of Ansel Adams, but Adams curated his experiences in terms of photography. You don't see in his photos something you might drive by anytime, without even noticing it.
Posted by: John Camp | Friday, 18 April 2025 at 03:13 PM
Correction: "… she considers two exposures per week to be heavy shooting." Actually, Mike, what Paloma Dooley says on the video is that if she makes two exposures *a month* she feels like she's on fire.
[Thanks. I knew I should have gone back and re-watched the video to check my facts. I used to be able to remember such things without trying, when I was young...in my 50s! :-) --Mike]
Posted by: David G. Miller | Friday, 18 April 2025 at 03:17 PM
On the large format perspective, I really like Ben Horne's YouTube channel. He visits a few specific national parks, repeatedly, year after year, and his channel is kind of an introspective on how these places change over time through the view of large format photography, and how his photography has changed.
https://youtube.com/@benhorne
Posted by: Aakin | Friday, 18 April 2025 at 03:46 PM
Correction please: It is Ranchos de Taos, not Rancho de Taos.
https://www.anseladams.com/products/explore-st-francis-church-ranchos-de-taos
Your phrase "...National Cliché Landmark for photographers..." made me laugh.
Posted by: Gordon R. Brown | Friday, 18 April 2025 at 08:57 PM
The drive into Bodie is almost the best thing about the trip. Back in 2011 there were irises blooming amongst the ruins!
https://mikereport.blogspot.com/2011/11/irises.html
Posted by: Mike Mundy | Saturday, 19 April 2025 at 12:47 PM
Mike,
I need to thank you for pointing out Paloma Dooley and her work to me. It's been both a revelation and a vindication. Her work is slower and more careful than mine, being taken with an 8x10 rather than a Leica M 240 or a Pentax K 3 APSC DSLR in the moments that I can spare in my waking hours when not working or helping my son through college. Yet we are chasing a similar aesthetic. There are glorious similarities in her images to ones I've looked for. I've looked at several of her images and wished I could have seen them and, conversely, wished I could set her and her 8x10 up before a couple of my "usual suspect" and see what her eye sees of them in her $50 exposures.
Meanwhile, the McDonald's sign is magnificent in how it draws the eye in to that tiny spot in such a large image; the tumbled down wooden fence in early spring; the industrial dam and enclosed spillway leading off toward a building while the rest of the water spills to the side... That one speaks to me loudly.
Too often modern landscape photography is about being highly saturated, superwide angle and "pretty" by whatever definition of pretty sells today. I've been guilty of it often enough just as often as I've been guilty of the all to common St. Ansel pastiche. I'd rather be trying to create something closer to her work than that.
Thank you for the reminder.
Posted by: William Lewis | Saturday, 19 April 2025 at 05:43 PM
Thanks for that. I enjoyed the video, and exploring her web site.
I will say though, if it's $50/sheet, I'd get the shutter fixed! Or buy another Nikkor 240mm/5.6.
Posted by: Rob de Loe | Saturday, 19 April 2025 at 09:06 PM
Very fascinating interview with Paloma Dooley. What careful consideration she gives to her projects and each photograph!
Personally, I would have found her subject matter deadly boring: LA smog, random houses and dreary dry hills. But, looking at her portfolio before hearing the interview, I was drawn in to her vision. The squares of propriety and control, the verticals, the juxtapositions...
Then, listening to her interview, she is so articulate and self-aware.
Posted by: Tom Stermitz | Saturday, 19 April 2025 at 09:28 PM
I totally agree with Dave Millier, and frankly I don't understand what you think is so good about those photos, Mike. And here speaks a graduate in the arts, so I do understand ‘something’ about composition.
[It's not about what I like. I've highlighted a broad variety of work over the years, in kind, in approach, and in quality. And there's never been any implication that every reader has to like it. We like what we like and what we don't, we don't. --Mike]
Posted by: Jozef | Sunday, 20 April 2025 at 03:21 PM
Paloma’s approach and work are truly inspiring. She (and this post) have motivated me.
Earlier today I took my dog to be groomed, which is about a two hour affair. My groomer lives 25 minutes east of me so I spend the two hours finding lunch (I didn’t - my two favourite spots were not open) and driving around, exploring. Heading down highway 14 from Sodus, toward Lyons, I found lovely hills along the winding roadway and there were multiple “photo-worthy” locations which reminded me of Paloma Dooley’s work.
So thanks.
Posted by: Earl Dunbar | Tuesday, 22 April 2025 at 03:40 PM
What a find! Thanks. Quiet,, thoughtful and beautiful photographs. And, not surprisingly, Paloma herself is considered and articulate. Marvellous!
Posted by: Bahi | Thursday, 24 April 2025 at 05:14 PM