<|-- removed generator --> The Online Photographer: Film Friday: $50 Per Exposure...

« Dog Woes (Blog Notes) | Main | Bob's Birds: Mini-Portfolio by Bob Burnett »

Friday, 18 April 2025

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

All I can say about her work is WOW! Just wonderful. Stephen Shore on a whole different level. And her contact prints are a great bargain. I shot with an 8x10 very briefly, many years ago, and there is nothing like it. Great find.

Paloma Dooley's photography and her explication of it are fantastic. There is a lot of ink spilled these days about the limitations of our youth. Then one comes upon a person like this and realizes much of that is nonsense. Thank you for posting this.

Here’s a bit of pool and photography: https://youtu.be/vVtjm8Qg24I?si=0rYNY1h_exW2FHWo

Markus is a wet plate photographer. In a previous life he specialized in pool photography.

Re: Paloma Dooley's profile, an excellent call-out, Mike. Free of arty pretense...speaking plainly about her motivations and choices. The kind of person you'd like to spend time with. With respect to her sensibilities I'd call her a kind of early mixture between Robert Adams and Mark Power (Magnum).

On a wider-angle, I've been following William Velbeek's YouTube channel for at least a couple of years. I think many TOP readers will find his videos to be very engaging. He's recently begun doing these profile pieces, such as Paloma's, that are presented 100% by the photographer (as opposed to awkward interview style). If you're new to William's channel make sure you have an hour to kill as you begin to peruse his videos.

the one of the ladder on against the half-chopped-down tree in "What it Feels Like to be a Beautiful Rectangle"

I think that's in Edges/Passageways.

[Thanks. Fixed now. Where the heck is the fact-checker? Taking a nap again, no doubt. --Mike]

Thank you for showing Dooley's work. I was not familiar with it and it is great work. You said the work was not made to be pretty, but I think it is beautiful and that helps draw you into the photograph. It is certainly a nice relief from the over saturated, over beautified work that dominants so much of landscape work these days.

I found the Paloma Dooley landscapes to be interesting. The shot through trees to an urbanscape below (with a McDonalds right in the middle) is somewhat reminiscent of a Cézanne. (It doesn't look like a Cézanne, but it's something that Cézanne might have chosen to paint.)

In documentary photos like these, there's always a tension between beauty and documentation; a lot of her photos include junk, and electric wires, and so on. Ugly stuff. Which is okay for that kind of photo, but I've always found myself somewhat bemused by the modern attitude that rejects simple natural beauty. (Although too much simple natural beauty photography is sadly clichéd.) I'm not a huge fan of Ansel Adams, but Adams curated his experiences in terms of photography. You don't see in his photos something you might drive by anytime, without even noticing it.

Correction: "… she considers two exposures per week to be heavy shooting." Actually, Mike, what Paloma Dooley says on the video is that if she makes two exposures *a month* she feels like she's on fire.

[Thanks. I knew I should have gone back and re-watched the video to check my facts. I used to be able to remember such things without trying, when I was young...in my 50s! :-) --Mike]

On the large format perspective, I really like Ben Horne's YouTube channel. He visits a few specific national parks, repeatedly, year after year, and his channel is kind of an introspective on how these places change over time through the view of large format photography, and how his photography has changed.

https://youtube.com/@benhorne

Correction please: It is Ranchos de Taos, not Rancho de Taos.

https://www.anseladams.com/products/explore-st-francis-church-ranchos-de-taos

Your phrase "...National Cliché Landmark for photographers..." made me laugh.

The drive into Bodie is almost the best thing about the trip. Back in 2011 there were irises blooming amongst the ruins!
https://mikereport.blogspot.com/2011/11/irises.html

Mike,

I need to thank you for pointing out Paloma Dooley and her work to me. It's been both a revelation and a vindication. Her work is slower and more careful than mine, being taken with an 8x10 rather than a Leica M 240 or a Pentax K 3 APSC DSLR in the moments that I can spare in my waking hours when not working or helping my son through college. Yet we are chasing a similar aesthetic. There are glorious similarities in her images to ones I've looked for. I've looked at several of her images and wished I could have seen them and, conversely, wished I could set her and her 8x10 up before a couple of my "usual suspect" and see what her eye sees of them in her $50 exposures.

Meanwhile, the McDonald's sign is magnificent in how it draws the eye in to that tiny spot in such a large image; the tumbled down wooden fence in early spring; the industrial dam and enclosed spillway leading off toward a building while the rest of the water spills to the side... That one speaks to me loudly.

Too often modern landscape photography is about being highly saturated, superwide angle and "pretty" by whatever definition of pretty sells today. I've been guilty of it often enough just as often as I've been guilty of the all to common St. Ansel pastiche. I'd rather be trying to create something closer to her work than that.

Thank you for the reminder.

Thanks for that. I enjoyed the video, and exploring her web site.

I will say though, if it's $50/sheet, I'd get the shutter fixed! Or buy another Nikkor 240mm/5.6.

Very fascinating interview with Paloma Dooley. What careful consideration she gives to her projects and each photograph!

Personally, I would have found her subject matter deadly boring: LA smog, random houses and dreary dry hills. But, looking at her portfolio before hearing the interview, I was drawn in to her vision. The squares of propriety and control, the verticals, the juxtapositions...

Then, listening to her interview, she is so articulate and self-aware.

I totally agree with Dave Millier, and frankly I don't understand what you think is so good about those photos, Mike. And here speaks a graduate in the arts, so I do understand ‘something’ about composition.

[It's not about what I like. I've highlighted a broad variety of work over the years, in kind, in approach, and in quality. And there's never been any implication that every reader has to like it. We like what we like and what we don't, we don't. --Mike]

Paloma’s approach and work are truly inspiring. She (and this post) have motivated me.

Earlier today I took my dog to be groomed, which is about a two hour affair. My groomer lives 25 minutes east of me so I spend the two hours finding lunch (I didn’t - my two favourite spots were not open) and driving around, exploring. Heading down highway 14 from Sodus, toward Lyons, I found lovely hills along the winding roadway and there were multiple “photo-worthy” locations which reminded me of Paloma Dooley’s work.

So thanks.

What a find! Thanks. Quiet,, thoughtful and beautiful photographs. And, not surprisingly, Paloma herself is considered and articulate. Marvellous!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Portals




Stats


Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2007