If you like interior photography, or just interiors, Zillow is an historically unique opportunity to sneak a peek into houses everywhere.
Just wondering...does your aesthetic sense extend to a lot of things in the world? I'm pretty convinced that most human beings don't think or feel about the world in this way. How things look—visual priority, you might call it—a sense of the aesthetic style of the world of appearances—just doesn't enter into their perceptions. I think it was either Grant Wood or Thomas Hart Benton who said that middle Americans were the most aesthetically dead human beings in the history of the world, or words to that effect.
But maybe the habit of looking at the world through an aesthetic filter is itself disreputable, I don't know. It does make you judgemental. It's possible that my reflexive tendency to look at the world through this prism is undesirable or misplaced. It certainly seems unfair to look at people this way, although I still do sometimes (we all do, albeit for different reasons. Scott Schuman certainly does. He's one of a small number of photographers who photographs "found" fashion on the street). I've had to train myself to overlook peoples' outward appearances to better see their humanity underneath. I try to be nice to all kinds of people. As if we are all equal, even though it's human nature to strive to pretend we're not.
And I myself don't dress well, speaking of Scott Schuman. Anyone could easily find fault with my appearance.
Trees and houses
But with some things it seems harmless enough. When I was a kid I actually had a mental list of beautiful trees that I had seen in my peregrinations. That might sound weird to say out loud. But I liked trees and I admired ones that were picturesque. Houses are easy to evaluate in aesthetic terms, because they are "presented" to the world by their outward appearance—realtors call it "curb appeal"—and you're not insulting anyone directly if you judge a house while driving by.
The housing stock in America generally is a complete disaster. It's a contemporary American characteristic that we select people who have an innately good design sense, train them to be architects, and then save money by not hiring them to design our houses. Not one house in a hundred was actually designed by an architect for a particular site or neighborhood. It was plucked from a catalog or concocted by a builder. We generally let builders design our houses—which of course results in houses that are calculated to be a.) salable to lowest-common-denominator tastes, and b.) easy and cheap to build. Or simply designed by someone who doesn't have a lot of aptitude or talent for design. That's how we get monstrosities like the ones found at sites like McMansion Hell. The top example on that site right now looks like a deliberate parody. Truly awful. Alarmingly awful. Dispiritingly so. Honestly, go look at that thing—check out the interior; it seriously wouldn't be any worse if it were drawn for an episode of The Simpsons.
The bigger the house, the harder it is to design well. But even garden-variety houses can be really bad. Just poking around on Zillow, it's unfortunately far easier to find ugly houses than attractive ones. But even acknowledging that I can be judgemental in this regard, and that it might not be fair to look for taste and beauty everywhere, this house took me aback:
This might be the worst one-box house I've ever seen. How can you screw up a plain box so spectacularly? Here's a rear view:
I just love that misbegotten little twist of downspout coming from the lower edge of the "mansard roof." That gutter placement is hilarious.
One of the funny things about this is that the real estate listing for this house features 15 photographs of the exterior, including seven of the front of the house. Like it was something to savor. The interior is actually pretty decent. But I'd be embarrassed to live there.
You can find an endless supply of very odd things about houses on the internet, and they always entertain me. Just a few examples and I'll stop:
Someone really didn't think things through here. I even wonder if maybe this isn't a Photoshop joke.
There's more than one way to skin a cat, as they used to say in New England.
What I like about this one is not so much the odd position of the loo, which is weird enough, but the "design" of those steps. Seriously, contemplate those for a minute. Truly postmodern. Someone really got carried away with that.
Passive Design Solutions
And just as an antidote to all the above, here's an example of a good design: Juniper Mountain is a passive house design from Canada's Passive Design Solutions. This house would be low maintenance and have very low energy costs, and it has enough room without being too large. I don't think it has enough storage space for a three-bedroom house, unless it's a vacation home. It would be luxurious as a house for a couple or a single person with one guest room. And I don't approve of the open kitchen (I like closed kitchen plans), but other than that, it's quite nice in my opinion.
My advice, if you ever build a house: utilize the services of a good architect who specializes in residential design, even if it's a very simple house, and hire an experienced professional contractor. And don't get fancy.
Bad design, like entropy, never rests.
Mike
Original contents copyright 2023 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)
Featured Comments from:
MarkB: "You just like that passive house design (Juniper Mountain) because they put a pool table on the plan. ;-) "
Mike replies: You got me. :-)
Bridget Dawson: "Oh my gosh...your timing of this is just right for my husband and I. We are laughing hysterically as we read this. We've been looking for a house in Florida, and we ignore 95% of what comes along because they are all so unattractive. No personality. Why does this entire state look like a giant suburb? Florida was charming in the 1970s, but now it's nothing more than the world's largest parking lot! Everywhere! And it's what's going on inside all these cloned houses that really aggravates us. White on white, with white, in white. Another ugly kitchen with ugly spotted granite countertops, ugly colorless stainless steel appliances, refrigerators the size of a walk-in closet, white cabinets to the ceiling that no one can reach...why does everyone want their kitchen to look like everyone else's? And don't even get us started on the lousy photographs...."
David Maxwell: "You are probably not much into Twitter, but an account on there called Zillow Gone Wild is a lot of fun."
Sebastian Broll: "The loo made my...not my day, but at least my pre-breakfast morning. Cheers from a usually badly-dressed person."
Colin: "Another source of both delight and distress is Zillow Gone Wild."
s.wolters: "Belgium has a reputation when it comes to ugly houses. Several photographers had projects about it and even accused each other of plagiarism in court. There are books and even organized tours, but if you want a quick impression about the scale and the looks of it just google images of Ugly Belgian Houses or try this link. Another is this one."
Mike replies: There's a Middle Eastern country—I think it might be Turkey, sorry if I'm wrong—that has a tax loophole for unfinished houses, which has resulted in countless houses being perpetually half-finished. A different but not dissimilar problem. Of course America sometimes has the opposite problem of Belgium's—too many rules rather than too few, not because of government but in private developments with strict rules on the look, size, color, and even landscaping of every house. I looked at a house in such a development where I wasn't allowed to fence my backyard. Land of the Free?!
I almost bought a lot in a development in Wisconsin until I discovered that I could not legally build a house as small as the one I wanted. Nor was I allowed to build a one-story design. They all had to be 2,500 square feet minimum, two stories, and either beige or light gray in color. One renegade had painted his house pale yellow, no doubt raising the ire and the emnity of the condo association.
jeremy t: "Here is a nice essay that discusses why houses in Belgium are often ugly. There is also a great book by Hannes Coudenys with photographs of some fine examples."
[Ed. note: See both ASW's and Henning's comments in the Comments section. Both are a bit too long to feature, but both are good and illuminate different important aspects of the subject.]
Jim H: "Where I live now (Santa Monica—near Los Angeles) is both ground zero for showing how money, wretched excess and custom homes exemplify bad taste, and also a showcase for some of the best residential architects ever—Charles and Ray Eames, John Lautner, Pierre Koenig, Richard Neutra and even Frank Lloyd Wright Jr. About 10 years ago, having house tours of these famous houses was a big thing, so we got to visit many of these houses and buildings by famous architects.
"You can waste a lot of time in my pages on these tours. I recommend the MAK House Tour first which ends with a visit to Julius Schulman's home shortly after his death while it was being cleared out for sale. Schulman was probably the most famous architectural photographer of all time. We met him once at a tour of the FLW Ennis-Brown house (linked to) and heard him talk about all the famous places he photographed.
"All of these pages are more than a decade old. Some of these photos are from earlier digital photos and some film—the 'Oak Park - 1971' pictures are scans from some Tri-X negatives we shot in a visit to the FLW homes in Oak Park where we joined a college class getting a private tour—long before organized tours. Most of the digital was taken with an Olympus Micro 4/3 camera with the 9–18mm zoom—really nice for architecture."
Yonatan Katznelson: "It seems to me that someone took the euphemism 'throne room' a bit too seriously in that last picture."
John Camp: "Because I've had an odd series of jobs and moves, and because I was lucky enough to get into a house when I was young, I've owned 11 houses in an already long life. I have worked with different architects specializing in residential work on two different homes and both made serious errors that were either expensive to fix or unfixable.
"The most annoying and potentially dangerous error over the longterm was a kind of eyebrow shelter over a front stoop that actually drained onto the stoop—this in Minnesota, which has an extended freeze-thaw cycle in both late autumn and early spring. For two months a year, the stoop was an unpredictable skating rink. The error was unfixable without essentially disassembling the house and rebuilding the entire front. On the other hand, it looked kinda nice, if you weren't lying on your back in the driveway with a broken spine.
"My advice to anyone working with an architect—you're probably smarter than he/she is, and you probably know more about your building site. Question everything, and stay on top of everything. Demand current and specific billing. Be especially aware of climate problems (like the freeze-thaw cycle, or flat-roof sections in areas with lots of snow, or large north-facing windows in cold climates.) Do not sign the standard AIA (American Institute of Architects) contract. Hire a lawyer to write the contract with the architect, and if the architect doesn't like that, find another architect. This will save you lots of money. (The 'standard' AIA contract is bullshit; it protects no one but the architect, and sets up a system that positively encourages the architect to spend as much money on the project as is possible.) Do not allow the architect to order anything from Europe. Anything that you can get from Europe is also made or available here. If you insist on Carrara marble...well, that's unfixable.)
"I could go on, but won't, except for one last suggestion: Buy an existing house that you find financially and aesthetically acceptable, and inspect the hell out of it so you know not only what needs to be fixed, but what you might want to change in the future.
"As for the commenter above with the unfinished wet basement, that can be fixed, without too much cost. And you can finish the basement simply and by yourself. Unless you live in a remote area, there are classes that will help you finish it. I've actually done all this—I've even installed a second bathroom on my own, and I'm not renowned as a handyman."
I love that website with the passive houses. I always look for something with a good porch, so this jumped out to me. I want to sit in a chair next to a buddy, drinking beer and talking politics.
https://www.passivedesign.ca/products/2355-sf-grand-etang?variant=39959184080958
Of course at 58 any next house should probably be single story.... but I want a porch!
Posted by: John Krumm | Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 02:44 PM
Mike: Not one house in a hundred was actually designed by an architect for a particular site or neighborhood.
On the other hand, once is a while you see a new home that, despite having a design that is radically different from the others around it (and unusual in its own right), such as this one which I stumbled across not long ago in Garrett Park, Maryland, seems to have been cleverly designed to match the limitations of the lot on which it was built and fits perfectly into the neighborhood.
Posted by: Chris Kern | Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 03:20 PM
You might be interested to see a house in my home town that was designed by an architect.
That house was built around 1901 by Clarence White, Sr. on Hudson Avenue in Newark, Ohio.
It's also somewhat notable because Edward Steichen chose to honeymoon there with his first wife, Clara. This photo of Steichen and his wife in White's living room is in the book, "Clarence White and His World" by Anne McCauley.
Posted by: Dave Levingston | Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 03:45 PM
The "Zillow House" is ugly. However....what matters much more than the aesthetics of the outside appearance is the aesthetics of the inside: how it feels to live/work in it. For all we know, it might have a useful, good feeling inside design.
Posted by: Keith B | Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 03:58 PM
After I bought my home, I hired a renowned builder in the area to build an addition that would serve as my studio. However, I wanted the space versatile enough to fit the next owner's needs, not just as a studio. The builder collaborated with an architect who conceived the addition as a sunroom. This design features an expansive wall of floor-to-ceiling windows, complemented by additional windows extending from ceiling to floor at each corner. The result is a cleverly designed and efficient space that, amusingly, surpasses the build quality of the original house. To someone, not an artist or photographer, it simply appears as a spacious sunroom offering stunning views.
Posted by: darlene | Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 04:18 PM
What always surprises me is that America has a history of excellent domestic house design. Obviously there’s Frank Lloyd Wright, but during lockdown I bought some books on mid-century domestic architecture and discovered the ‘Case Study’ houses. Interesting stuff - and some of them even got built!
Posted by: Tom Burke | Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 04:19 PM
I think it was either Grant Wood or Thomas Hart Benton who said that middle Americans were the most aesthetically dead human beings in the history of the world, or words to that effect.
I would like to see the samples from which either Grant Wood or Thomas Hart Benton derived that assertion.
Posted by: Speed | Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 04:32 PM
“ either Grant Wood or Thomas Hart Benton who said that middle Americans were the most aesthetically dead human beings in the history of the world”
Only an American could say something so gobsmackingly provincial.
Posted by: Tam | Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 05:14 PM
That's obviously a looby trap for the unsuspecting guests!
Posted by: George | Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 05:25 PM
Had to laugh upon seeing a pool/snooker table in the floor plans of that Juniper Mountain house design, and wondered how much of a factor that was in your approval rating! But is it the 'right size' of table?
Posted by: Dave Stewart | Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 05:59 PM
That bathroom makes me wonder. There has to be some odd circumstance causing it to be laid out that way. Maybe a huge immovable boulder in the basement? Or some other circumstance we can barely imagine causing the throne to be so situated. I like pictures that make you think like that
[<>Most likely it's in a basement and had to be raised so it could drain to the sewer. —Mike]
Posted by: Terry Letton | Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 06:54 PM
My working life was spent in two different businesses: I was a sole proprietor in an architectural/construction photography business, and I was a sole proprietor as an architect. One helped the other.
One thing I did as an architectural photographer was to turn off, or turn down at least my architectural design sensitivities as I would never have been able to produce appealing and saleable photos of some of the projects I was commissioned to photograph. They were designed by architects in nearly all cases, but knowing how the business works I also know that projects often have stages like this:
1. The developer goes to an architect and says "I want you to create the most wonderful building design for me for this project, and this is my budget. I am committed to producing a building that is outstanding in every way".
2. The design goes through various stages, with the developer cutting back on his budget a bit at every stage.
3. The building goes in for a development permit, which is the permit that describes the building; its purpose, its size, materials, overall appearance and layout. After an interminable time at City Hall, the permit is produced.
4. The working drawings are produced, including architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical and landscaping drawings in detail. We're now 3 to 6 years into it.
5. Excavation commences, and then the foundations are poured and the below grade levels begin taking shape.
6. The developer watches nervously as his financial resources are stretched, and he hires his 2nd or 3rd marketing consultant to sell spaces or leases. A marketing consultant now tells the developer that he could make more money if he divided each floor plate in his condo or office tower so that one more unit resulted, albeit all would be smaller. Also, if the developer scaled back on those fancy balconies or those expensive exterior panels. The developer goes to the architect and instructs him to make those changes. Since the building is not even above grade, the changes are possible, but take a while as new permits have to be achieved. Structural columns still have to be where they were before as the foundation is fixed, but things are made to fit around that problem as well as possible, but the floor plans are now a mess.
7. An interior designer is hired that puts a 'luxury' veneer on everything, but the underlying materials, fixtures and such are cheap because the whole exercise is now about making it cheap, selling it quickly and moving on to something else. With the changes, the delays that it causes and extra work, the project doesn't necessarily become more profitable, but it does become less functional, less attractive and because of back end cutbacks, lower quality components and materials leaves buyers and tenants unhappy.
8. As a photographer, I have to go and make this mess look good.
Houses built by small contractors have many other problems.
Posted by: Henning | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 12:39 AM
We have built a lot places not worth caring about.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 07:19 AM
i would guess that the high bog (loo for fancy)
would solve a backup! problem. maybe more than one bad design issue there.
toddle loo (byeee) old bean
Posted by: brian | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 07:57 AM
You might check out the HGTV series "The Ugliest House in America."
Posted by: steve jacobs | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 08:56 AM
The odd bathroom picture in your post most likely shows a bathroom added to a finished basement. The raised floor provides space for plumbing. I'm not sure why the toilet is on a literal throne, but I suspect they needed the extra height to hook into the existing sewer outlet through the basement wall.
On a more general note, your post made me think about how many folks in their 20s, 30s, and even 40s will never be able to afford to build a house, let alone worry about aesthetics or design. We're all just trying to find a home. Any home.
My wife and I were lucky to sneak into our first home in 2020, thankfully before the mortgage rates started climbing. Anyone house-hunting on a middle-class income will know the difficulties we faced. In central MA where we moved for my wife's work, easily 75-80% of homes on the market were priced above our maximum budget. Many of the remaining homes needed an immediate $50K+ in repairs to be livable, removing them from contention because of the rules of the home loans we qualified for (e.g., home has to be "move-in ready"). Attending a crowded open house with dozens to hundreds of other shoppers for the tiny remainder of homes in our price range illustrated the sheer mass of people who want to own a home but can barely afford to.
I'm not sure if our house would impress anyone from a design standpoint. It's a basic two bedroom ranch on an unfinished basement built in 1969. The basement will remain unfinished because it regularly features an (unadvertised) indoor swimming pool after our increasingly common torrential rain events. Nonetheless, my wife loves this house. She grew up extremely poor in adverse conditions and so having any home is a blessing to her.
From the aesthetics standpoint, our home does feature four different colors of carpet (two shades of blue, green, and red!) across four rooms, which is clearly a choice made by someone with class. The worst part is that the carpet is actually high quality, so if/when we eventually pull it out it will feel like a waste.
I have downgraded my life goals from designing and building my own home to building a decent garage in the distant future so that I can have organized tool storage and space for DIY auto repairs, which is something I enjoy doing. You want elegance in the homes around you. I want a square box with a waterproof roof, flat cement floor, and a two-post car lift.
Posted by: ASW | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 09:15 AM
Former neighbors moved to a house with a "throne" like that one, to get the toilet above the sewer pipe.
Posted by: MikeR | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 10:36 AM
I once walked a prospective girlfriend home in middle school, complaining all the while about how embarrassed she was about her home's appearance. I assured her such things hardly mattered- heck, we lived in a small apartment! Nevertheless, she continued to complain, and I continued to reassure her as we continued to walk. Finally, I blurted out that no matter how bad she imagined it to be, at least it wasn't as bad as say... the one we were now currently in front of. And with that, she burst into tears and ran right into said edifice.
Posted by: Stan B. | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 10:45 AM
Before wishing for more storage remember "Junk expands to fill the space allotted"*
*First law of gaseous bric-a-brac
Posted by: Mike Plews | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 12:43 PM
In response to Bridget Dawson:
I live in a brick house in North Florida with oak cabinets in the kitchen and not a spec of white paint on the house except inside trim work. You must be talking about central and south Florida. I lived in Miami-Dade for seven miserable years in a 5,000 sq ft concrete house with a tile barrel roof that last sold for over a million. I could not get out of there faster. Come North where you will be in The South; a much better place to live and retire. Best to you!
Posted by: darlene | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 01:24 PM
On the upside for the first house, new shingles are less expensive than new siding.
Posted by: Bryan Hansel | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 02:30 PM
Mike,
Don't ever visit Phoenix (or the suburbs)
Posted by: Mike Cawley | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 02:30 PM
A friend of mine lives in a house designed by Stanford White, or at least the interior was, the house itself is about 200 years old. Anyway, it has a few of those doors that open into a room where the floor is higher than the threshold of the door. Granted, most of them were designed to be used almost exclusively by the servants but still sometimes you just don’t want that stairway on the other side of the door.
Also, the commode on a platform is often found in houses that were built in the days of chamberpots and before the advent of indoor plumbing. It’s either that or lower the ceiling of the room below, and sometimes for various reasons that just isn’t possible.
Posted by: hugh crawford | Friday, 25 August 2023 at 11:03 PM
Horror in housing: fly into ATL (Atlanta) from the west and your plane descends for 20 solid minutes over miles of look-alike cul de sac McMansion enclaves. Totally designed for personal use of cars always, everywhere. Gawd, how is this abomination possible?
Posted by: Kodachromeguy | Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 11:18 AM
That passive house looks claustrophobic! I don't think I can even fit my bed into several of the bedrooms (at least not with room to open the door and change the sheets). Rooms that small are a joke I saw in older houses, last time we were looking, it's kind of scary the some new designs are going back to them.
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 05:48 PM
I’m sure I’m in a minority here, but I just don’t care how others dress or the look of their home or car or shoes or... anything. What a waste of time it would be for me to sit at a computer, zipping through websites and smirking, snorting, guffawing, or ridiculing the appearance of whatever.
How does any of that affect me, my life, my choices? Answer: they don’t. Not one iota. Yes, some designs or looks don’t appeal to me. Fine. I get to choose for myself. I don’t see the point of criticizing other choices - perhaps I need to be educated on the purpose of such critiques.
Personally, I’d rather spend my precious time pursuing more creative and enriching activities. Like reading, which is why I come to this site consistently. The articles here tend be engaging, provocative, thoughtful, and purposeful.
This one, I find not so much.
I’ll know to skip articles on this site concerning style, architecture, homes, etc... in the future. They’re obviously written for someone else. And I don’t want to rain on what others find pleasure in.
[Except...you just did. --Mike]
Posted by: Ernest Zarate | Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:21 AM
Regarding the passive house design presented, I like how the front door opens into a foyer with the door on the left into the garage, the door straight ahead to the laundry room and the entryway to the right to the kitchen. (I dislike having a front door located where one opens it and exposes the private living area to some unfamiliar person when answering a door-knock or doorbell.)
However, what I dislike about this design are the windows that face the driveway. It appears that one's backside is exposed in the window while sitting on the toilet in either bathroom. Higher horizontally positioned, rectangular shaped, clearstory windows on this wall would provide better privacy and would complement the shape of the windows on the garage door.
Posted by: jp41 | Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 12:54 PM
That one-box house has one huge advantage though: It's almost maintenance free! I just painted my house (all wood paneling) and it has taken me all summer...
Posted by: Svein-Frode | Monday, 28 August 2023 at 07:50 AM
Don't know why I didn't post this earlier but one of the more interesting home designs is the Not So Big houses of Sarah Susanka. Take a look. https://susanka.com/not-so-big-house/
Posted by: John Krill | Monday, 28 August 2023 at 11:58 AM
Mike, for an interesting house design idea Google Mother-in-Law Doors Newfoundland or check out this 99% Invisible article - https://99percentinvisible.org/article/doors-to-nowhere-elevated-front-entries-in-newfoundland-raise-questions/
Posted by: Michel | Monday, 28 August 2023 at 02:53 PM