Of all the viewfinders in all the cameras you've ever used, which would you say is your favorite?
If you don't have one, no worries. You can sit this round out.
"Finding the view" is one of the basic functions of a camera as a device, and has been since the beginning. A history of camera viewfinders would be astonishingly varied. How does the camera show the operator what it's about to take a picture of? It's a technical problem, of course, but it's also integral to how the photographer interacts with the visual world, and and how she relates to the camera as a tool.
Do you like an OVF or EVF? TTL or not? Looking down, sideways, or remotely? Several Fujis can be switched at will from optical to EVF, an exotic but useful feature. The Leica SL's feature a super-high-quality screen, which nicely echoes the original Leitz SL's, some of which had microprisms over their entire field. Larger cameras tend to have larger VFs—comparing the view through a medium-format DSLR to the one through a consumer APS-C with a mirror-box is instructive. The one seems as broad as the Grand Canyon, the other like peering down a tunnel or through a keyhole.
If some company was going to build your perfect camera, at your direction, what kind of viewfinder would you tell them to make?
As I think about this question, two cameras come to mind. They're from different eras, so maybe I can be excused for mentioning them both. One is the Olympus OM-4T film camera, which has a remarkably generous and direct viewfinder for such a small camera. The other is the Panasonic GX8, which has that high-quality EVF that swings from vertical to horizontal and everything in between. I loved that one. (At some point in the 2010's, I transitioned from being an OVF to an EVF guy. I like to shoot in low light, which is where the EVF comes into its own. In daylight, you still can't beat an SLR.) The GX8 viewfinder must be difficult and/or expensive to make—I can't imagine, otherwise, why any company would develop that and then promptly orphan it. Such a shame.
I also love the viewfinder in the iPhone. Looking at an image that's already in just two dimensions has always been helpful to me in visualizing. That's true whether you're looking down at the waist-level finder of a TLR or looking at the back of a smartphone. It's pretty clutter-free, too—viewfinder clutter doesn't get much "ink" in the Photosphere, probably because most cameras give you options, but it's become an increasing problem in the electronic era.
And of course I still love the view through the Wista 4x5 with its fresnel intensifier. Seeing the image as it's cast by the lens has a special kind of magic. Back when I taught, the day when I'd let all the kids line up and look through the 4x5 was always a fun day. I loved hearing the happy exclamations of amazement from under the dark cloth.
Mike
Book Product o' This Week:
Is it too late for this? 2021 is still young. There are two reasons to value these Michael Kenna calendars from Nazraeli Press: one is that his originals are 8x8", so these pictures are meant to work at wall-calendar sizes. The other is that Michael's calendars can actually increase in value! Dan Smith suggested this, and he reports that some older ones sell in the hundreds of dollars. "The printing is excellent," Dan wrote, "and the calendar is beautiful."
The above link takes you from TOP to Amazon. This week's pick is not available at Amazon Canada, but 2019 is. Hey, the pictures are still good. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Original contents copyright 2021 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Jack Mac: "My favorite viewfinder is on a Leica S. Mike, you have looked through mine; did you approve? I do not have a favorite mirrorless viewfinder. None of them are enjoyable to use except at night. I like the Leica M10 RF viewfinder but interestingly sometimes combine it with a live view WiFi connection to an iPad. Then it’s as if I’m looking at a 8x10 ground glass. Should I cover my head with a black cloth?"
Mike replies: I took pictures with it twice, once at the sushi restaurant near the expressway between Waukesha and Brookfield, and once on our field trip to the ruins of the old Pabst Brewery. But although the impression I have is good, I don't really remember it well enough because I just didn't use it long enough.
Richard Arsenault: "Great topic. Two answers: My favorite viewfinder is...a.) the one I am actually using right now. Too many cameras not being used. :-( b.) the one that won’t fool me and crop out the people on the sides of that group shot I got finagled to do at so-and-so’s wedding (mostly because of the item above). The only thing about EVF that irks me is that there are so many bits of information that I am always at risk of focusing on the camera settings instead of the shot. Granted that is more of an « id10t » user issue than anything else, and my biggest goof-up (above) was when I was using a new-to-me DSLR....
"All the best and hope your pool game is improving."
Mike replies: Right now I am making some spectacularly difficult shots and missing some very easy ones. I'm concentrating on position play, and that's slowly getting...a little better.
Rod S.: "The Cambo T-20 reflex viewfinder for my Cambo Wide DS 4x5 camera. This viewfinder brought me into 4x5 format and architectural photography, by far the biggest advance ever in my photography. If getting under a dark-cloth was the only way to do 4x5 then I may well have said 'No way.' The Cambo T-20 reflex viewfinder is a simple device. It contains a 45-degree angled mirror and 2X magnifier within a high-quality, robust plastic housing that swivels between landscape and portrait orientations. The net result is revolutionary: You look downwards into the soft rubber eyecup positioned at a comfortable high chest height and view the image upright, not inverted. And the camera bubble levels and lens controls and shutter all become easily viewable and accessible. I can focus accurately and quickly using the 2X magnifier, another real advantage over conventional practice. It makes my 4x5 use...slick. I shoot architecture in busy foreign places where getting under a dark cloth would have me feeling vulnerable. This viewfinder solved that problem, too.
"The design has been cloned by Shen Hao to fit onto numerous other brands of cameras. I have these clones for my Toyo VX125 and Arca-Swiss F-Metric. If you shoot 4x5 or are intrigued by the possibility, this viewfinder might just be the thing that makes it all sing."
Steven Palmer: "Easily, the viewfinder from my Nikon FM3a is my favourite. It's big, bright and has match needle metering. For those who have never used a camera with match needle metering, you can see your exposure without actually having to look at the readout. You can see the needle with your peripheral vision so you don't have to look away from your subject. The FM3a also has an exposure lock button under where your thumb is likely to be so you can change exposure quickly simply by moving the camera to a brighter or darker part of the scene and pressing the button when the needle gives you the exposure compensation you want. It's simple, dead easy and fast."
Jim Simmons: "A topic near and dear to my heart. I look for three things in a camera, all of which I require—excellent viewfinder, ergonomics, high quality lenses. So...my favourite 35mm SLR viewfinder is the Leicaflex SL, in spite of 92% coverage. Magnification reportedly .9X, and the fine micro-prism screen snaps into focus like no other SLR I ever used. Eye relief was just OK (I wear glasses), but I had a diopter made so I could use it without glasses.
"Next favourite: Pentax 67 with Beattie fresnel screen. Only 90% coverage, but a big screen to look at and compose on, and the Beattie screen makes it reasonably bright.
"Next favourite: Arca-Swiss 4x5 with fresnel screen and the mirror viewer. The viewer is almost as big as the camera, but it makes the viewing a delight—both eyes used and right side up (but flipped left-to-right).
"But my most favourite viewfinder of all time is my current Fujifilm X-T4. 3,690,000 dots for very fine resolution and crisp focusing, 100% coverage, .75X magnification, very long 23mm eye relief. A real joy to use. I have adjusted all the elements of the viewfinder—brightness, colour, contrast—so that I can trust that what I'm seeing on the screen is very close to the Fuji JPEG settings I use most often. This is as close to a WYSIWYG viewfinder I've ever used."
Kodachromeguy: "For a rangefinder camera, the Leica M3 is hard to beat. That has always been my favorite."
PJ Cicalo: "For many years my longstanding favorites were on my various Olympus OM bodies. Then I got a Voigtländer Bessa R. Now that was a bright viewfinder! Much brighter than any Leica I ever peered through."
Vijay: "For me, the viewfinder is the most important part of the camera. Bad viewfinders discourage me from taking photographs. Great ones invite me to engage with what I’m seeing and lead to more enjoyable photography and more satisfying results.
"I prefer viewfinders that most closely match what I see with my own eyes. Rangefinders are my top choice, followed by reflex finders, and EVFs are a last resort. In all cases bigger is better. Eyepoints under 20mm put me in a bad mood. When shooting landscapes on a tripod, I’m all for the fully articulated LCD screens for convenience and the size of the view.
"Favorite viewfinder ever: Zeiss Ikon ZM. Never owned one though, as I’m afraid of the lack of parts/service."
Michael Ryan: "My favourite viewfinder is the 27" iMac 5k in my studio while shooting tethered."
Mike replies: Now that's a viewfinder. :-)
Helcio J. Tagliolotto: "The Contax RTS III's viewfinder. It's even color corrected."
Mike replies: Yes, that one was a beauty. Deluxe construction. It was criticized because the exposure information in the finder (in blue!) was allegedly difficult to see in bright light. I never owned one but only looked through them in the store, so I don't have experience with that.
Number 1 is my OM4T. It's got an amazing VF. Close second is my Hasselblad 500cm. I use the Russian knowk-off 45 degree finder woth it qne it'w qlmowt qw good, just not as bright.
But I'm crazy. the most hated ones were the Leica IIIg and M9 that I once had, but stranggely, the RFon my Halsselblad xPan (really a Fuji) suited me well.
Bill Pearce
Posted by: Bill Pearce | Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 06:54 PM
My two favorite viewfinders are on film cameras: 1. Olympus OM4T 2. Zeiss Ikon (ZM mount) camera made by Cosina. The Mamiya 6 (not the folder) is also wonderful. My favorite digital camera viewfinder is the Fujifilm X100F (or other X100 models)--I think the hybrid viewfinder is brilliant.
Posted by: Steve Rosenblum | Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 09:52 PM
The GG on my whole plate camera or the 5x7 back for it.
Mercy is my Olympus E-M1 Mark II. I love how it previews what you will get when you release the shutter.
Posted by: Dave Karp | Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 11:20 PM
Ricoh GV-2 28mm, originally on Ricoh GR Digital & now on Ricoh GR.
Posted by: Richard Parkin | Friday, 19 February 2021 at 03:10 AM
Thanks for raising this Mike - a super important and somehow underestimated subject. Isn’t photography about seeing? And what/how you see depends primarily on the viewfinder...
You’re mentionig my constant peeve with the contemporary EVF cameras - the view is typically cluttered - and few (if any) cameras allow you to remove the overlaid information and leave just the focus target and exposure information, leaving a clear, undisturbed view.
My second pet peeve is the low dynamic range (blown highlights / invisible shadows) of the EVF displays - somehow rarely mentioned in the enthusiastic „feature-oriented” reviews (X million pixels! Y refresh rate!) and affecting my personal experience to a much higher degree, especially in sunny / contrasty conditions.
My favourite is the rear LCD of my Fuji GFX50S. It’s large, clear, tilting (in two directions), visible even in bright light and the image somehow looks better than through the EVF. I actually moved away from DSLRs because I like framing primarily via rear LCD screens... (there, I said it).
Posted by: Jerry B | Friday, 19 February 2021 at 08:35 AM
I've got a soft spot for the Canon AE-1 viewfinder. The way it was bright enough, had decent focus snap, but the little split prism and circular focus collar in the middle made it a pleasure to focus. I spent hours marveling at the design of it as I used it. The little needle that would flick into position to show you data was also beautifully done, all in a mass produced camera.
I don't get the same pleasure from focusing an EVF with a bunch of colored rectangles over the image. Functional, yes, but pleasurable? No.
It makes me somewhat happy that the AE-1 sound lives on with Apple devices however. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/24/jim-reekes-the-apple-sound-designer-who-created-sosumi.html
Pa
Posted by: Pak-Ming Wan | Friday, 19 February 2021 at 09:06 AM
The best digital finder I've used, in terms of just being comfortable to view, is the Nikon Z6/7. The Leica CL is also very good, considering the size.
But the best all-time viewfinder for me is the Leitz SBOOI 5cm accessory finder. Super bright, and with a magnification of 1 (life-size!), it gives you frames lines that just seem to float in the air.
Posted by: Hank | Friday, 19 February 2021 at 11:17 AM
Nikon F2 with a non metered prism and an E screen. Like going to the movies in there. Second place is a tie between an ancient Hassy 500c with a 45 degree prism and a bright screen and a Toyo 45 Deluxe.
They are all fun to just look through.
Posted by: Mike Plews | Friday, 19 February 2021 at 11:25 AM
Very late to this, but my Pentax 645Z VF is my fave. I liked the viewfinder of my A7R because it was like having night-vision, but it had some of the faults of EVF's from 7 years ago. And then, I also liked the VF of my Fuji GSW690II---the RF was useless in my opinion, but it was just so simple otherwise---just a way to frame the shot.
Posted by: Tex Andrews | Friday, 19 February 2021 at 12:49 PM
I'm surprised no one but Mr. Ryan mentioned an external monitor. Even a 5-inch unit, battery powered unit, mounted in the hot shoe is a big improvement anywhere you can possibly use it. (Goes with the tripod, in my experience.) 7-inch even better and almost the same $$. And you get all those wonderful other things like focus peaking, false color and on and on.
Posted by: Greg Heins | Friday, 19 February 2021 at 03:01 PM
About the GX8 mystery- maybe Panny deliberately lowered the EVF size in the GX models to create more market distinction from the upcoming FF cameras? Sure, EVF's make possible a large finder on a small format, but let's keep that among ourselves. Rangefinder-style cameras don't sell as well as DSLR replicas, either. Push them to the younger, causal consumers who appreciate their Retro style, and will probably use the rear screen instead of the EVF, anyhow.
Posted by: John McMIllin | Friday, 19 February 2021 at 06:01 PM
Zeiss Ikon, no question.
Posted by: Graham | Saturday, 20 February 2021 at 01:23 AM
I always loved the finder on my Leica M6 bodies, although focusing fast, longish lenses like the 75/1.4 Summilux-M was a challenge.
Fuji later introduced switchable finder magnifications on their X-Pro1 and X-Pro2 cameras, which is a feature I truly like. For whatever reason (well, probably cost) they dropped it on the X-Pro3, making the camera's OVF more or less unusable with my most-used focal length, 18mm (28 mm-e). This was a dealbreaker for me, so I stayed with the X-Pro2.
[Don't you hate it when a cameramaker gets something truly right, and then changes it? The late Burt Keppler of Popular Photography magazine said that the more cameras you review, the more of those instances you'll discover. His "perfect camera" was a mashup of features from various cameras he had reviewed over the years, many of which were defunct. --Mike]
Posted by: Carsten Bockermann | Saturday, 20 February 2021 at 03:30 AM
Nikon F3HP 100% coverage.
Posted by: terence morrissey | Saturday, 20 February 2021 at 11:28 AM
Two favorites, both for my Barnack Leicas:
SBOOI - 50mm 1:1, incredibly bright with projected frame lines. Works very well with both eyes open, one looking through the SBOOI the other looking directly at the subject. The effect is to see the frame lines superimposed on the subject.
Visoflex II - Bright ground glass screen that snaps into and out of focus better than any other I have used. Adjustable focus so I can use it without my glasses. Pentaprism finder with 4x magnification or vertical finder with 5x magnification. I use the 90º finder for hand held shooting and the vertical finder for tripod work.
Posted by: Doug Anderson | Saturday, 20 February 2021 at 12:10 PM
Optical, on ground glass, for me. EVF's disconnect me from the subject, though sometimes they are just invaluable, especially the ones that tilt usefully. Preferably, the ground glass is big, but, of course, that is not always the case. But there's nothing like navigating around on the focus screen of a large-format view camera, which is called that for a reason--direct view, no reflex, no magnification (except for the handheld loupe). The Maxwell screen on my Sinar brings me and my lousy eyes real joy.
Posted by: Rick Denney | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 02:21 AM
As someone who started with a 3 megapixel fuji point-and-shoot and is now mostly a smartphone-using photographer, the live view screen is my overall viewfinder of choice. i have mostly just tolerated DSLR viewfinders but in my time with it, the D700 viewfinder was the one i liked the most. Though i havent handled that in quite some time, the viewfinder on the mamiya c220 with the flip up magnifier is another favourite.
Posted by: almostinfamous | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 06:59 AM
First, what I don't like:
• Viewfinders that don't support precise in-camera cropping, or that introduce parallax errors (knocks out rangefinders, TLRs, and a majority of early SLRs that wanted to protect you from slide-mount surprises).
• Viewfinders that rotate or flip the image into something with different balance than what will make it to the uncropped print (removes view cameras and waist-level OVFs).
• Viewfinders that make it hard to do manual focus (eliminates a large swath of modern AF-centric cameras where manual focus is an afterthought).
• Viewfinders where useless info impinges the frame in a way that can't be turned off.
• Viewfinders that just don't show enough detail, or color information, to avoid thwarting effective previsualization.
So what's left? At the moment, it's the excellent 5,760K-dot EVF in my L-Mount Panasonic Lumix S1R. I can see exactly the crop I'm getting, even at alt aspect ratios (like 4:3, which is my standard). Color, contrast, and detail are right up there with good quality FF and MF DSLRs, but unlike those, I can compose in monochrome, if I want to, see the review image immediately after firing the shutter, without moving my eye, and still have at my disposal quick configurable tools like peaking for focus and zebras for exposure.
Posted by: Tim Wilson | Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 02:18 PM
The value of the viewfinder I find to be linked, though not directly, to the experience of the camera as a whole. If I have to name one viewfinder in and of itself, I'd say the Minolta SR-T202. If I link the experience of the camera as a whole, then the Minolta X-700 or the Nikon F2 with DP-1 finder. The F2 is definitely not the biggest and brightest, but the positioning of key info is a big reason why I still use it more than 40 years after buying my first one.
Posted by: Gil Aegerter | Monday, 22 February 2021 at 12:46 PM