Each time you think Leica has gone completely off the rails, something comes along to whisper, "It can always get worse."
What is it this time? Well, watch your gag reflex. It's the "Leica M-P ‘Correspondent’ Designed by Lenny Kravitz."
You can't make this stuff up:
Many Leica cameras are unique. But now, all 125 examples of the strictly limited Leica M-P ‘Correspondent’ set are all unique, each in its own way. An elaborate wearing process completely by hand has carefully rubbed, scuffed and scratched the black enamel finish away in several places on both the camera and lenses to let the bright brass surface shine through. The look changes every time the camera and lenses are touched and begins new, personally written chapters in the story of their design.
That's right. It's a special limited-edition pre-brassed Leica, with a name calculated to taunt every actual photojournalist who has ever actually used a Leica hard enough to put real wear on it. (Especially those of them who are now out of work.)
As for the, um—aaack!—designer: "Lenny Kravitz is famous around the world as an exceptional and very successful musician. But he treats photography with his Leica with exactly the same passion."
Translations:
"Exceptional and very successful musician." Did one of the best-ever covers of The Guess Who's "American Woman."
"Exactly the same passion." Steals classic-rock guitar riffs then proclaims rock and roll is dead.
May I just bring to this post exactly the same passion as Perez Hilton? "Bitch, please!"
(I swear I have never actually spoken that phrase—I'm a grown man, after all—but I did warn you to watch your gag reflex.)
I knew BMW had finally gone off the rails when I learned they were piping fake engine noises into the cabin using the stereo system. Perhaps the "Lenny Kravitz M-P Correspondent" marks the official Jump the Shark moment for the new revived digital-era Leica?
Your thoughts? (And does this post go into our category "Cameras, New" or "Cameras, Old"?)
Mike
(Thanks to O.G.)
Original contents copyright 2015 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Ting-li Lin (partial comment): "[Leica has created] a new category of camera condition: 'NLWU' or 'New, Like Well-Used.' Imagine when these cameras go onto the used market, how would a seller describe their conditions? 'Like New, and also Like Well-Used'?"
emptyspaces (partial comment): "Lenny Kravitz is one of the most overrated musicians of all time. If it weren't for the hair and the leather pants, the snakes, the full-length mirrors, the white pianos, and so on...would we care? Do we care? He dresses and acts like a rock star, and that's pretty much it."
Eric Brandon: "While I completely agree with you about the absurdity of the new Leikravitz 'M-P Correspondent,' I'd like to stand up for Lenny Kravitz as a musician. His first album, 1989's Let Love Rule, is a genuine classic and you know as well as anyone that standing on the shoulders of giants doesn't mean you're 'stealing' anything. His most recent album, 2014's Strut, is the best thing he's done since Let Love Rule, and some of the best rock and roll released in the last year. As an audiophile, you should appreciate that both those records sound great too."
Norm Nicholson: "Something is happening out there. First Lady Ga Ga covers Julie Andrews with reverence and sensitivity, then Leica covers Leica with this!"
William Lewis: "I've recently started playing electric guitar. My axe of choice is a Squier Telecaster. Squier is the 'budget' brand of Fender and is better in many ways, these days, than the low end Fender guitars from Fender proper. Yet go over to the Fender Custom shop and look into buying a reproduction of, say, a classic 1952 Telecaster and you'll have the choice of making it look 'New old stock,' 'Closet Classic,' 'Light Relic,' or 'Heavy Relic' aging. By these standards, the pre-brassed camera would be a 'closet classic' or 'light relic' while the 'heavy relic' would look like a guitar that served someone like Keith Richards or Eric Clapton on the road for decades. An example of a heavy relic Telecaster that is for sale can be seen here. It's just as ugly in guitars as it is in cameras and, frankly, just as stupid. Harsh word I know. But I really can't think of one more appropriate for the precious pretentiousness of a pre-aged tool."
Herman: "It goes to show that Leica has the brass."
Alan B. (partial comment): "Sorry, but you can’t buy real street cred."
Len Salem: "And then there could be the super extra unique versions with dented bodies, dinged filter threads, and very artistic scratches on the lens outer element. Also, to special order only, fungoid growth inside the lens and light leaks from the base plate. Regrettably all these extras will triple the normal unique price point."
igor: "Does each 'example' come with a large number of unique, artistically made, critically acclaimed shots? If not I am not buying."
Jack Foley (partial comment): "I'm a lifelong newspaper photog, so I've brassed my share of camera bodies the legit way."
toto: "How can I restore one to its untouched mint condition?"
Mike replies: You know how you drive an OCD-afflicted collector crazy? Casually suggest that he didn't get the best pre-worn Leikravitz.
"They're all different, you know. And they did a much better job with the brassing on some than on others. Some of them are really beautiful. Yours is...well, it's...okay. I guess."
Gabe (partial comment): "When I was involved with Leica clubs and groups and history I always made sure to read Tina Manley's advice, adventures and experiences. Seeing her comment in the Comments Section here reminds me that she always embodied the classic Leica world-roaming journalist/photographer. Very much worth a look."
Hi Mike - this was always going to get a lot of comment.
In the UK antique furniture business they call it distressing.
Back to cameras - I do remember back in the 60s/70s actual photojournalist pros "accelerating" and "improving" the look of the brassing of their genuinely pro black paint Ms, Fs or Spotmatics.
This reminds me of the lines of many years before that from the great Irish writer Flan O'Brien writing newspaper pieces under one of his several other n de p's Myles na Gcopaleen (sp?) on a special service he was launching for a those with a good library but no time to read the books - he would do that, make some erudite scribbles, thumb the important pages, etc - but you really shoiuld read the original which will be in books of his collected works. A ***** highly recommended for a journalist such as yourself.
regards
danny
Posted by: danny | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 07:47 AM
The sharp definition between the enamel and brass.....is not the way a camera "brasses" in actual use. Has Leica no shame? I'd be interested in knowing who buys these bits of precious nonsense and what they do with them.
Posted by: Jake | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 07:52 AM
I ate in this falafel place in Paris a few years ago:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27As_du_Fallafel
It has a sign outside proclaiming Lenny Kravitz thinks it sells the best falafels in the world. I thought they were just OK. For this reason, I will not buy this Leica. Also, because I'm not completely stupid.
Posted by: Ian Land | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 08:24 AM
I seem to recall this idea coming up before?(grin) - but this Kravitz thing trumps that easily.
+1 for the Flann O'Brien book-handling reference in another comment!
Posted by: richardplondon | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 08:53 AM
I guess I'm in the minority here, but I think it's a brilliant idea: Take a slow selling camera (the MP is a film camera, after all), scuff a few of them up, give them the imprimatur of a popular artist, put them in a snakeskin leather box, and charge more than for a pristine version. Complain all you want, but I bet they'll sell every one of them.
Posted by: Gordon Lewis | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 09:03 AM
It's a camera. A tool. It will do the job. If it wasn't so expensive less attention would be paid to it.
Posted by: Hans Berkhout | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 09:07 AM
A new Lieca designed by Lenny Kravitz.
Often times, in the guitar world, the artist will be part of a video to introduce and explain their signature guitar. Sincerely, I hope Leica will come out with a video of Lenny doing the same for this camera.
It's been a long hard Winter. I welcome all entertainment.
Posted by: Wayne | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 09:17 AM
"Did one of the best-ever covers of The Guess Who's "American Woman."
Boy, that's damning with faint praise.
You were far too kind.
Posted by: Paul Bass | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 10:21 AM
You know what would make this insanely collectible? If each one was individually "brassed" by some very famous celebrity, who would also include their signature or personal note along with a certificate of authentication. Even better is if you don't know which world famous person handled your Leica until you opened the box.
Posted by: Mikey | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 10:34 AM
What I find ironic is that some people want their $$multi-thousand Leica gear to look like it's been through a war, while other people put camera armor on their $500 cameras and cell phones, not to mention screen protectors, cases, bumpers and any other imaginable protective device so that when it's obsolete in a few years, it still looks like new.
Posted by: Dennis | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 10:55 AM
I can't wait for the Don McCullin Nikon F that have all been pre-shot by someone with an AK-47!
Posted by: Simon | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 11:31 AM
I just checked my calendar and see it is not yet April 1st. Hmmm...
Posted by: Christopher Perez | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 11:57 AM
In defense of guitarists: since guitars are made of wood, the sound they produce can and do change with age. The same is true for the vacuum tubes that are used in guitar amps. It is also necessary to account for the different manufacturing practices and materials of 1965 when compared to 2015. Add it all up and this "aged sound" is the reason that vintage instruments are sought after by musicians. Of course, pre-aged new guitars and amps are cosmetic only and are (rightfully) laughed off.
Cameras, to be sure, are a completely different animal. Are there really people who say their pictures are inferior because the camera hasn't been physically broken in? (Knowing photographers, probably yes...)
Posted by: HT | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 01:16 PM
Gah. They've been churning out this nonsense since what, at least the glut of "special edition" M6's? We groan every time something like this comes out, but we're never totally put off from the brand. Why? Because they're still the only ones making a proper digital rangefinder, and at the end of the day that's worth something to a small group of photographers.
It's unfortunate that the camera market in 2015 dictates that foolishness of this sort is more profitable than, oh I don't know, designing a digital rangefinder that more people can afford.
Posted by: BH | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 02:21 PM
Leica's attempt to get their collectors to actually use the camera? In any case it is a great publicity stunt...
Posted by: Gert-Jan | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 02:41 PM
Jim Marshall did a much better job, for lessmoney....
Posted by: Hans Berkhout | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 06:35 PM
They missed something. You can't get a camera to lose that much paint with getting a few scratches, dents and dings.
Posted by: John Hagen | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 08:04 PM
Because it's a limited edition, most will go to collectors. And then you get the absurdity of a distressed camera kept in a glass case, forever looking Minty.
Posted by: Kirk Thompson | Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 11:37 PM
The devil began his work in the early 1970s when us teenagers would repeatedly wash our $5 Levis to achieve a certain worn look.
The truth, of course, is that those old jeans (the denim is no longer made in America, nor is it of the same quality) were never meant to be washed.
And thus may have come about the notion of the dirty hippie.
Posted by: Mani Sitaraman | Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 03:52 AM
Dam kids and their long hair and rock 'n' roll. Get off my lawn, and take that relic'd guitar and faked camera with you. And buy some new jeans that aint worn and faded. Dam kids.
Posted by: Brett Jensen | Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 06:51 AM
It's not only that the wear is fake, it looks fake. For those sort of dollars I'd expect my fake to look real, not authentically fake.
Posted by: Peter Barnes | Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 08:35 AM
Lenny Kravitz was photographed by Jim Marshall. The nicely used/aged cameras of Mr. Marshall's must have left a lasting impression on the musician.
Posted by: Hans Berkhout | Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 08:52 AM
I don't agree that scratches, dings, dents and brass are something you "earn". It just takes some careless handling and casual banging around and you will "earn" plenty of that pretty fast, and what's so noble about that? A camera is not a uniform or badge. It's mainly a tool. And this particular one is stylized by a musician/photographer. It doesn't actually look like a photojournalist's well-worn camera because the non-brassed parts look pristine new and shiny. So think of it as a distinctive paint job. Rather than being something fake (like a fake Oscar), it's a real Leica with 2 great lenses. We photographers employ a measure of stylization and artifice in photography, so why are we so critical when someone does the same to an object?
Posted by: Zlatko | Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 12:49 PM
Perhaps it could come pre-loaded with photos you didn't take either!
Posted by: Steve | Friday, 27 February 2015 at 01:53 PM
Every day, I carry my Fuji X100t to the gym (used to carry a Digilux 3 but it's too big to stash in my gym bag)...
I work in Beverly Hills and stopped to pick up lunch. A very nice woman (a customer) at the counter asked "Is that a Leica?"
Me "No - it's a Fuji X100 - it's digital"
Lady "It looks like a nice camera"
Me "It is thanks".
Lady "Have you been to the Leica Store?" (It's about 1.5 miles east of where I'm standing).
Me "No I haven't"
Lady "Oh you should go"
Me (trying to be thoughtful). "I've been shooting for about 40 years. My uncle gave me his Leica (a IIIf) when his eyesight failed. That camera is in my office along with a newer Leica that I still use a lot because it has a meter. I don't need a new Leica - they've kind of lost me as a customer."
Lady "oh"
She was very nice and just trying to start a conversation and I regret not being more friendly. When I spoke to her, I had not seen Mr. Kravitz's 'design' so, I was a little subdued. My comments to her have worried me since - until I saw 'The Correspondent'.
This just sums up why I have ZERO interest in today's Leica despite toying with the idea of an M9 so I can use my lenses with a digital for 'more everyday' use. Now leaning towards an A7ii.
If 'poseurs' want to spend $10k for special cameras - maybe it will help Leica stay afloat until LVMH buys the brand.
Posted by: Lemmy_Caution | Sunday, 01 March 2015 at 04:52 PM
Dunno if someone made this comment before (maybe several people, if so, my apologies).
Looking at Kryn's camera - you can see the wabi-sabi, er, wear, is in specific places. The very essence of wabi sabi is the visualization of the forces of nature - and the habits of the photographer - in action over time. That is what is truly beautiful.
The ersatz pre-brassed version has the fake wear in implausible places, and taking implausible forms.
Wabi-sabi it ain't. Now, if they had managed to _replicate_ faithfully the wear pattern of a truly used camera, THEN I'd be really impressed.
Mike C
Posted by: Michael Cytrynowicz | Monday, 02 March 2015 at 07:31 PM