So a not-so-idle question: What do you think are the top three most generally recommendable small(ish) cameras, circa October 2014?
I'm pretty determined to publish a list of "Small Cameras We Love," which I've had on a low boil for a long time now. (Long enough for the cast of candidates to shift not once but several times.)
I like lists because I think they're fun. But my enthusiasm for lists has been fading for two reasons: one is that I keep encountering lists that are poorly thought-through, and the second is that lists have become known as an easy knee-jerk way to suck in peoples' attention on the Internet, and I have a reflexive dislike of cynical manipulation.
Re the poor ones, I was stuck with nothing but my phone for amusement while waiting for an appointment a few days ago, and saw a list of "23 Novels You Must Read" that I thought would serve as diversion. Wrong. The compiler obviously mainly read horror, on top of which he or she piled some standard recommendations. I mean, yes, To Kill a Mockingbird is something everybody should read, but most people already have, many of us while in high school. So to include it on a list is not...information.
(And there were several collections of short stories on the list, apparently another special interest of the listmaker's. Block that title.)
Sometimes you see pretty original research in list form, however, and that can be interesting. For instance, this map from Paul Lamere's MusicMachinery.com shows the most distinctive artists in the top 100, state by state, from a year or two ago—that is, the things people in each state were listening to that most of the rest of the country wasn't. So in New Jersey they were still listening to favorite son Brooce, probably fantasizing that the rest of the country hasn't moved on, and the Newts and Emmets are still stuck on the Dead and Phish, and the Detroiters have elevated Young Jeezy to localized stardom statewide, and Texans are loyal to stolid straight country. And who or what is "Bonobo"? (I know what a bonobo is.) It doesn't mean much in the history of the world, but it's all kind of touching. As I say, fun.
So give me your top one, or two, or three, but only if you give it some thought. Lists aren't important, they're just fun; but they're only fun if they're good.
Mike
Original contents copyright 2014 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
No featured comments yet—please check back soon!
@ Alex C: "I know bigger sensors are nowadays gathering momentum, but still - FujiX30 is a real camera, that handles like a camera, not like a gimmick."
I think you will absolutely love it! It's every bit a photographer's camera, rather than an "enthusiasts" camera. Mine positively yanks me out to shoot nearly every day I've owned it. It's so good I might have to come out of retirement to write a new camera review of it for Mike. (Naw.)
Just buy it.
Posted by: Kenneth Tanaka | Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 01:12 PM
Olympus OM-D E-M1: I have one and really like it.
Fuji XT-1: If the E-M1 didn't exist, I'd likely have one of these.
Panasonic LX100? Never touched one, but sure does look promising.
Posted by: Kirk in PDX | Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 05:19 PM
OMD-EM-1. I hesitated with this as I'm not sure it's considered a 'small' camera anymore ... how things have changed!
How good do I think it is? Well I've just traded in all my Canon gear (inc. a 5D3) for an EM-1 and lenses. Bottom line - it does everything I need to do (including pro work) as well as or better than the Canon. Note that I'm not saying its better in absolute terms, just better for me.
Of course it's not just the camera - what pushed me over the edge was the wonderful 12-40mm Pro series lens, and the forthcoming items in the Oly Pro series.
I also have an EM-5 which is good, but the EM-1 is (to me at least) surprisingly better.
Colin
Posted by: Colin Work | Thursday, 16 October 2014 at 10:26 AM
Late to the party because I've been travelling incessantly, but...
George Strait?????? GEORGE FREAKING STRAIT??????
We have a thousand more distinctive musicians in Austin alone than George Strait... oh, wait.
It says "most distinctive top 100 artist" in the fine print. That would be the best-tasting bottled water contest. Sorry. I'm better now.
Sony RX1, Leica T, Panasonic DMC-LX100.
Posted by: Bob Blakley | Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 01:41 PM