Apparently lots of people don't like lists very much. I think adamct, in the featured comment to the previous post, nailed the reason why I do. Still....
Well, I'll forge ahead anyway.
Who are the ten greatest photographers?
Dare I ask? But keep reading....
This is going to be a big challenge, and it's going to tax you. It's an experiment that could well end up being a failure. But instead of the usual GOAT-type list, let's see if we can crowd-source—er, TOP-source—a list of TODAY'S great photographers: that is, photographers who came along after the advent of digital, after the advent of the Internet.
I.e., not the old graybeards or grannies who made their bones in the '60s and '70s. Not the people who have been retreaded through the museums for years now, or who are on their third or sixth or tenth book. (No matter how much we love those people. And we do, of course.) I'm talking about people nobody would have heard of before 1995 or so.
Where to start?
The first, almost mandatory inclusion, in my mind, would be Vivian Maier, in that she's almost exclusively an Internet phenomenon—to me she's one of the sensations of c. 2009, not of the years in which she worked. But she's cheating, since she's a film photographer from mid-century who only came to prominence during the digital era. (Call her the Eugene Atget of the digital age.)
Whether you only want to assay a nomination or two, or concoct your whole list...here's my challenge for you: who are the greatest photographers of the digital era? (Regardless of their actual chosen medium.)
Gauntlet duly thrown....
Mike
Original contents copyright 2013 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Marcus: "Bryan Formhals and Blake Andrews put together an interesting list a year ago with a nice little twist: '10 Oeuvres Aspiring Photographers Should Ignore,' a list of photographer's styles that have been copied to death and run their course."
Mike replies: That's wonderful. I'd never seen it before. Thanks.
And that is definitely one distinct hallmark of the digital/internet era: common styles being copied unto death.
Terrence Morrissey: "One to add to the list, Joey Lawrence only 23 years old."
Mike replies: Too obviously commercial for me. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Rory Challands: "My choice for number one would be Jason Eskenazi. He's an uncompromising New Yorker, whose refusal to go for commissions has made his professional life tougher than it should have been. He was turned down by Magnum, and was scraping a low wage as a security guard at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in NYC while his book, Wonderland: A Fairytale of the Soviet Monolith, was selling out in the shop there.
"Wonderland (though it could do with a bigger format so the page break doesn't split each photo down the middle), is my favourite recent photography book. It's an elegy to the people of the former Soviet union, and documents the human relics of that fallen empire in the decade following its collapse.
"Jason is a master of photographic depth. He doesn't take pictures of things. He take pictures of the relationships between things. Each of his photos is beautifully layered with a rhythm that takes your eye dancing sadly through the frame. It's classic black and white street photography/photojournalism that doesn't break any moulds or claim any new inventions. But it's so exquisitely felt and executed that his name should be listed in the hall of Greats.
"He's obviously sacrificed to take the images he does. I hope he doesn't question too much whether its worth it. It is."
[Ed. Note.: Wonderland is back in print, and can be ordered directly from Jason at his website for only $32! Cool. I did not know. Much better than paying $73 to $900(!) at Amazon. —MJ.]
RobinP (partial comment): "Whoa!—shock and horror. Thanks, Mike, perhaps you've just pointed out one of the failings of the 'digital era'; or maybe I just live in the past...nearly all the books on my photography shelves are of artists who produced their best work long before 1995."
Mattias: "Rinko Kawauchi. She is to Japanese photography of the last decade what Moriyama was to the '60s and Araki to the '70s, a true original with a distinct vision. About the only thing she seems to have picked up from her peers is, in her early career, the diaristic content à la Araki, which she has progressed away from."
Dave: "This is a brilliant idea. Because I can't think of a single photographer for this list, I can't wait to see the results. I'm looking forward to being inspired by the finalists."
Stan B.: "Before the digital era I could at least name most of my faves off the top of my head; now...it's like expansion teams gone wild. I've well exceeded your suggested limit—so cut me off where need be:
"Taryn Simon, Zoe Strauss, Aaron Huey, Matt Black, Mark Steinmetz, Eva Leitolf, Leon A. Borensztein, Brenda Ann Keneally, Brian Rose, Jens Olof Lasthein, Scot Sothern, Doug Rickard, Jason Eskanazi, Bruce Haley, Thomas Michael Alleman, Thomas Kern, Robert Gumpert, Vanessa Winship, George Georgiou, Dave Jordano, Valeri Nistratov, a holy host of others, and of course, Vivian...."
Derek Lyons: "These lists always end up being lists of the 'most widely known'...because really there's no other way to find common ground."
Karsh.
Posted by: marcin wuu | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 06:39 PM
Uh, this is what you get for not reading the post in it's entirety... scratch Karsh then. Put Chase Jarvis in his stead - the guy's not only a damn good photographer, he also invented instagram. It wasn't called instagram back then, and it's not that I like instagram, quite the opposite, mind you, but it was something geniunely new for the photography, and respectworthy just for that newness alone.
Posted by: marcin wuu | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 06:44 PM
Is it wrong to pander to TOP with names like Weese, Turnley, etc.?
[I would say...yes. —Mike]
Posted by: MarkB | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 06:46 PM
Just what does post-digital, post-Internet mean? Both digital and the Internet are still around, so there's not such 'post-anything'. Or are you trying to say (in too few words) that you want a list of photographers who have since come to notice since the beginning of the Internet and digital photography? If so, what date is the starting date?
And Vivian Maier does not, to my way of thinking, belong in the category that (I think) you're attempting to define, as all her work predates both the Internet and digital photography.
Posted by: Dave Kosiur | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 06:54 PM
After 1995 is tough, because a lot of the photographers that I like started a little bit earlier.
Andreas Gursky is probably considered numero uno these days, based on his work from the '90s on. Alec Soth is also probably up there, and, although I don't love his work, Gregory Crewdson has become highly respected. You've also got the portrait folks like Platon, Jill Greenberg, and Martin Schoeller.
That being said, I'm a bigger fan of street photography from the likes of IN-Public, so shooters like Jesse Marlow and Nils Jorgensen would probably be high on my list. I also love Cindy Sherman, and her work is selling like crazy now, but she's probably been around too long for this list.
Posted by: GH | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 07:00 PM
I said before that lists are irrelevant and I stand by it. I'm going to mention two names that I believe to be among the very best, although I know they won't be in the TOP list. They are two portuguese photojournalists with something interesting to say.
The first has to be João Silva. He's a portuguese-south african photojournalist who formed a group called 'The Bang-Bang Club' with Kevin Carter, among others, in the '90s. He was working in Afghanistan for The New York Times when he stepped on a landmine and lost both legs. I happened to see an exhibition of the pictures he took before his accident. They are superb. It's incredible how someone can take care of framing and composition in a fraction of a second and still get it perfect, as João Silva does. His photographs are of rare artistic quality, his mastery of colour being quite impressive.
The other is Daniel Rodrigues. He's still very young - he's 25 - and has already a WPP prize under his belt. Despite all his talent, he had to sell all his equipment in order to pay his bills. As all is well when it ends well, he received support from Canon Portugal and a portuguese bank, which allowed him to purchase new equipment and resume his rather promising career.
There are also lots of unsung heroes. For instance, I'm very fond of the work of french street photographer Benoît Rousseau, who is some kind of Facebook phenomenon. Like the aforementioned portuguese photojournalists, he'll never make it to TOP list. Maybe he's not good enough, but he's good enough for me.
Posted by: Manuel | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 07:15 PM
Don't look now Mike but the golden age of photography has been over for quite a long time. It's perhaps one of the great ironies of our time that as photography has become so mainstream that your dog can do it, it has simultaneously lost nearly all of the glam and fame that it enjoyed during its more secular hobby-horse stop-bath days. Yes, there are living, practicing photographers who have gained some measures of current fame. (I disqualify Vivian Maier as she's from a much earlier era and was only unearthed through a modern form of accidental archeology.). But will they ever be celebrated for greatness? No. Will many be remembered in, say, 10 years? Certainly by their families but otherwise...not many.
Why? Photography has lost it's magic as both an informational and art medium. For the former it's not to be trusted. For the latter it's been made anemic and dull in the hands of art schools. That's why the same old mid-20th names appear in museum shows, in collection lists, in auction catalogs. Don't believe me? Take a look at look at lot lists from recent auctions at Christies, Sotheby's , Swanns, Phillips, etc. The names won't change much in 10 or 20 years.
So where is photography going? It's being aggressively merged into contemporary and conceptual art. That's where the growth and money is, or at least that's where the bets are.
So the aforementioned disclamatory preamble notwithstanding who would I nominate for a list of outstanding current day photographers who you might not know? I nominate Abelardo Morell. No, he's no spring chicken. But:
1. he's a photographer's photographer, and knows the science and art of the medium exquisitely well,
2. he's made the jump from chemical to digital photography sans the whining and wailing so common from his (often lesser) peers, and
3. he never fails to show something amazing.
The Art Institute of Chicago will host a terrific show of Abe's work this spring/summer, titled The Universe Next Door. The show will travel to the Getty and to Atlanta's High Museum, and will be accompanied by a catalog.
So Abe Morell gets my vote for your list, Mike.
Posted by: Kenneth Tanaka | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 07:35 PM
Adrian Freeman
http://www.flickr.com/people/24040948@N08/
Posted by: Brian S | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 07:35 PM
Some nominations in alpha order: Susan Burnstine, Nettie Edwards, Chris Friel, Sally Mann, Alexey Titarenko, and James Wainwright.
I realize that Mann and Titarenko were known a few years earlier than 1995, but they are both very special and became really well known somewhat later than 1995.
Posted by: William Flowers | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 07:46 PM
You're right, Mike. I don't like lists. Settling for just one that I admire the most, I agree with the only name you mentioned: Vivian Maier. I'm not notably religious, but I think it is an absolute sin that she died in poverty and unknown. Maybe the Big Guy made it possible for someone to accidently discover the treasure trove of negatives, developed and undeveloped, that she left behind. I don't know. It's a facinating story.
Posted by: Rick Wilcox | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 07:48 PM
Gregory Crewdson.
Posted by: Ahem | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 07:50 PM
For fashion: Sebastian Kim.
Posted by: Martin Ranger | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 07:51 PM
Camus Wyatt: http://www.camuswyatt.com/f322384055
Kristos Kapatos: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/christos_kapatos/popular-interesting/
Posted by: Tom Stermitz | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 08:13 PM
Without perimeters it would be very difficult due to the number of practitioners. You have those who heavily manipulate photos to Create an image that was not what the camera saw. What about HDR practitioners? Vivian's work is what the camera captured and they are celebrated for their frankness. I think that similar frankness in digital falls to the street and sports photographers, capturing that fleeting real life vividness that is not overly manipulated. No pun intended, but my lack of exposure to very many other artists works leaves me out of the list makers. But it will be interesting to see what the top ten are that show up the most from the lists.
Posted by: Mathew Hargreaves | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 08:28 PM
Sandra Bartocha, Jan Tove. Their work consistently touches me on a physiological level.
Posted by: Pete Atkinson | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 08:44 PM
While I've never been a self horn-tooter, no list would be complete without me on it. Hey, you think it's easy to screw the pooch constantly, F up the exposure, have trees growing out of people's heads, all in spite of attending a multitude of workshops, seminars, read dozens of books, practice until the CF cards are smoking, but no, rarely a good shot. Oh, I'm one of the best. all right. ;-)
Posted by: Mark | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 08:48 PM
Mandatory inclusion #2 has to be Google Street View.
Posted by: nick | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 08:51 PM
Mike,
The renowned "i-photographers" that I know of are limited to those who write for TOP or has been featured in it. And I haven't even seen prints of their photos in person (except for a few reproductions I've seen in National Geographic, Time and fewer still, books). So my vote doesn't count for much.
But this sure is one "survey" I'm looking forward to tabulating. (I hope there won't be too many complete Top Ten nominations. . . ;)
Posted by: Sarge | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 09:10 PM
Sorry I do not wish to play
[We're relieved you let us know. Are you also the type of person who announces it every time they fart? --Mike]
Posted by: Dan | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 09:12 PM
I have to say that a majority of the photographers I enjoy have moved on to other realms long ago. Fox Talbot, O'Sullivan, Atget, Weston and Sudek were all artists who produced sublime images. Images which are deeply moving and you can spend time with.
However, I recently discovered someone whose work I adore and who is actually contemporary: Abelardo Morell. His Camera Obscura series is insightful (in post-modern way) to the way the camera works and, also, aesthetically stunning.
http://www.abelardomorell.net/posts/camera-obscura/
Posted by: david | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 09:20 PM
Sabastiao Salgado. His body of work speaks for itself. No one I know of shoots b&w photojournalism as well as he does. No only are the images themselves amazing, his efforts to make the world a better place through his work places him at the top of my list.
Posted by: Shelley Stallings | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 09:38 PM
Mike,
I am not sure we are yet in a "post-digital, post-Internet" era of photography. I would argue that we are certainly in the third or fourth generation of commercial digital photography; and as those that work in the industry might postulate a "web 3.0" Internet. I am also wondering how you would define "greatest"? Especially in the context of the current era you are trying to define. "Greatest" could mean "greatest" contribution to this "post-digital, post-Internet" period; contribution as in moving us inexorably into the future of post-film, post-print. Or it could mean commercial success or even something, perhaps, as banal as greatest quantity of Flickr or YouTube or other social media postings (and therefore has a great social influence). Or does greatest really mean one that provides the greatest personal pleasure of the images they create; which in the end what photography has been doing one way or another for over 200 years!
Posted by: Michael T. | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 09:45 PM
Myself.
Posted by: Lith | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 09:49 PM
First, because I don't think the man get's enough credit for his amazing work outside of the military: MSgt JT Lock USAF ( http://www.mpjconnection.com/?p=768 ) he's won Armed Forces Photographer of year six years in a row and for my money is one of the top in the world.
Second, Time Hetherington, not just for his tragic death but the entire body of his life's work.
Posted by: Dave | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 09:53 PM
You want controversial? Thomas Hawk. I'm ducking now. :-)
Posted by: Richard | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 09:53 PM
Alec Soth seems like a no-brainer. He has to be one of the youngest Magnum folk, yes?
Posted by: Chris Norris | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 09:54 PM
Joe McNally. Harder to choose from the ladies - Lauren Greenfield and Annie Liebovitz spring to mind.
Posted by: The PG | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 09:58 PM
In today's social media world, how many photographers are known because of their aptitude with social media as opposed to their photography skill? I'd love to see this question posted on a gear-oriented or how-to basics site.
And my vote would be Trent Parke.
Posted by: Jason | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 10:22 PM
I'm very much looking forward to this. If one person posts a top ten list, then it's something to debate (I mean, discuss). But if dozens of your readers chime in, I know I'll learn the names of some excellent photographers that I've never heard of before. My own top X list would be comprised largely of photographers that have been around a while (or have come & gone). My choices for modern photographers aren't made with a lot of confidence - basically, because I know there's so much out there I haven't seen - these are essentially the best of my bookmarks :)
Juan Buhler
Guy Tal
Vincent Munier
Julie Blackmon
Chris Jordan
Alex Maclean
and a bit of a guilty pleasure: Clark Little
- Dennis
Posted by: Dennis | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 10:31 PM
I'm a legend in my own mind, but otherwise I have no idea... :-)
I have a list of a dozen or so amazing photographers I follow, but the most famous of them still shoots film exclusively and I don't think I'd call the others "the best", they just happen o be folks whose work I discovered and enjoy.
Posted by: Godfrey | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 10:41 PM
If Joachim Eskildsen doesn't end up on your list, I'll cry. Not too well known but I think he eats everyone for lunch.
http://www.joakimeskildsen.com/default.asp?Action=Menu&Item=99
Posted by: Paul | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 10:45 PM
Irving Penn. He was great with people shots as well as objects. Everything it "touched" turned beautiful!
Posted by: Robert Newcomb | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 10:52 PM
All I know for sure is I'm not on the list, but I nominate O. Winston Link and Ansel Adams.
Posted by: Al Patterson | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 10:57 PM
Todd Heisler.
Barbara Davidson.
Peter Turnley.
Ernesto Bazan.
Sebastio Salgado.
Alex Webb.
Danny Wilcox Fraser.
Ragnar Axelsson.
Vivian Maier.
Posted by: Mike | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 11:09 PM
My favorites Some classic, some contemporary.
Elliot Erwitt
Nick Brandt
HCB
Sally Mann
Steve McCurry
Pete Turner
Diane Arbus
Ansel Adams
Edward Weston
Marc Adamus
[You didn't actually read this post, did you? Edward Weston is not a photographer no one had heard of prior to 1995. —Mike]
Posted by: MJFerron | Thursday, 25 April 2013 at 11:21 PM
My short list of top digital photographers. My choice because their work rings my bell, they are very open about their art, They are are all current, and they are wonderful people:
Joe Mcnally
David Hobby
Zack Arias (a grey beard for other reasons)
David Duchemin
Joey L (Lawrence)
Phil Borges
Kirsty Mitchell (her wonderland series is not comped in post)
Trey Ratcliff
John Keatley
Peter Turnley
Posted by: Mike Sims | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 12:15 AM
Sohrab Hura--not that he is one of the greatest photographers of today, far from it, but, like Eugene Smith or Walker Evans of the past, he combines a unique vision with passion. Here is a gallery of his recent work: http://timemachinemag.com/past-issues/issue-one/sohrab-hura/#1 He seems to have no online personal gallery that he keeps up to date, but here are some old photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/7889576@N05/ and yet another here: http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2009/06/sohrab-hura-oasis/
Posted by: Animesh Ray | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 12:27 AM
I want to throw out a friend of mine, Michael Jang. Not only is he a fantastic photographer, but he also uses the internet in a new and different way to promote his personal work. Everybody do yourself a favor and check out his work.
www.michaeljang.com
Posted by: Bernd Reinhardt | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 12:46 AM
The photographer who has stirred me most deeply this century is a young artist from Finland: Elina Juopperi.
I chanced upon an installation by Elina Juopperi at an exhibition of Sami art in Helsinki: All the Ones that Speak the Language Minus 30, and was instantly smitten.
Hers are some of the most intense portraits I have ever seen. There are no books featuring her work yet, no websites that I know of, just a few links like this one . Elina's last exhibition took place in Karasjok, in northernmost Norway. From what little I'm gathering, she's steadily moving on, artistically and geographically. And no, I've never met her.
Posted by: Chris Lucianu | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 12:57 AM
No won comply....
Reason:
Since I don't sleep with any photographer (at the moment) none is personal to me. So I don't care about photographers, I care about art. Art is the expression of a photographer, that is to say, detached from the creator at the moment of the creation. So I could probably make a list of great photographs of the Internet age (that would contain about 50OO works sort of in a random order, that would change day by day). Now that would be a great work of art in itself (but that form was pionered by Jörg Sasse with his work Speicher II, 2009 2010) in which he framed 1024 (if I recall correctly) vernacular photos of the Rühr area he found and collected from junk sales of which each day 16 were exhibited in a random order. So I nominate Speicher II as my complete list.
Greets, Ed.
Posted by: Ed | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 01:41 AM
Pinkhassov. Apart from his flat-out genius, he has his new age chops well sorted with an Instagram feed that's worth publishing as a book on its own.
Posted by: expiring_frog | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 01:53 AM
Though plenty of people would have heard of him pre-1995, I think Paul Graham should definitely be on the list (he of 'a shimmer of possibility' as well as the essay that's basically defined photography in the digital era, though it doesn't address digital specifically, The Unreasonable Apple).
Posted by: Geoff | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 02:06 AM
Unfortunately there is no relevant photographer working digitally and Gursky is a painter.
Posted by: cb | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 02:07 AM
a list like this is obviously 'just for fun'; no such thing as 'greatest anything', really, people have different taste and preferences, so this will only reflect such taste and preferences of the ones who respond.
i also find that most of today's young photographers are not that good at all, many of them however have mastered the art of online self promotion to the point that they can lead people to believe they are actually good ('well, if so many people like him/her, he must be great').
i will throw one name of a current, young photographer, who actually seems to know what he is doing: zack arias.
Posted by: stefano | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 02:17 AM
Japanese photographer Hiroshi Sugimoto would be my choice. When I see his work I see a man who looks in wonder to the world like I do.
His seascapes are an example of how simple beauty can be.
Posted by: Henk | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 02:27 AM
I think landscape/fine art photographers Michael Kenna and Charlie Waite would be in my top 10. Both have had considerable success well before the digital era, but both are still active and regularly use digital media to promote their current work.
Posted by: Geoff Smith | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 02:35 AM
Alex Wild (http://www.alexanderwild.com/ and http://myrmecos.net/) is one of the greatest wildlife photographers working today. He knows and loves his subjects, and I think it shows. Digital has really sparked a renaissance of macrophotography. Alex Wild is one of the best.
No idea for the other nine (haven't had my first cuppatea yet), but no doubt I'll comment throughout the day as I think of people.
Posted by: James Sinks | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 03:29 AM
I'll be interested to see how photographers of now break down between those who see the print, yes even the giant print, as the one true objective of photography and those whose end product is purely digital, lives in display(s) or projection. Will Ken Jarecke, as the Nick Ut of the first Iraq invasion, make the list?
scott
Posted by: scott kirkpatrick | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 03:40 AM
I would have to have Avedon in my list, technical control and a wonderful imagination. I am going to have to stew on what others.
Posted by: Marten Collins | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 04:10 AM
Careful Mike, Remember what Dean Raider wrote in his block about avoiding living names as the dead can't pester him on Facebook! It's all right for us, we are more or less anonymous so we need not fear that. You on the other hand.......
Great thread last time!
Posted by: Henry Rogers | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 04:11 AM
Ten photographers who's work I've admired recently: -
Adam Pretty
David Doubilet
Jackie Ranken
Maciej Makowski
Paul Nicklen
Pawel Uchorczak
Chris Hadfield
Carsten Egevang
Danny Green
Frans Lanting (not sure how well known he was pre 1995, but he is an all-time favourite and still producing great photos)
Posted by: Dan Hillier | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 05:11 AM
Whoa! - shock horror. Thanks Mike, perhaps you've just pointed out one of the failings of the "digital era" ; or maybe I just live in the past... nearly all the books on my photography shelves are of artists who produced their best work long before 1995.
Only one name that springs to mind. Lichfield began to do interesting things at the dawn of digital but then he died.
Posted by: RobinP | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 05:36 AM
http://www.stephengill.co.uk/portfolio/about
Stephen Gill of London, is one of my current favourites for his quiet, understated, urban photography and dry wit.
Posted by: Phil Martin | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 05:37 AM
I think you need to put some qualifiers around the phrase "greatest photographers".
For example, are we talking about photographers who embrace digital photography or is film allowed? What about post-processing using an image editor? Can the photographer be a technique-orientated documentary photographer or the "out there" artist who happens to use a camera?
Posted by: Sven W | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 06:22 AM
Christian Coigny would be in my list.
Posted by: Eric Kellerman | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 06:26 AM
To make it simple if you are making a list, a few current photographers off the top of my head.
Terry Richardson
Gregory Crewdson
Andreas Gursky
Alex Prager
Pieter Hugo
Roger Ballen
Ryan McGinley
Rinko Kawauchi
Aei Weiwei
Posted by: Marcus | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 06:30 AM
I'm sure folks younger than me have numerous candidates for this list, but for me, the past decade or so hasn't been all that interesting. Yes, the new tools are great, but maybe that's a problem?
That being said, I'd have to mention Angela Bacon-Kidwell even though she's guilty of placing angel wings on a human, which was a ubiquitous trangression in the early days of digital and one that I thought I could never forgive. Digital photography seems a natural vehicle for Bacon-Kidwell's vision in a way that I rarely see for others.
Posted by: latent_image | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 06:56 AM
I don't agree with your list (just on principal and even though it hasn't even been made yet). I do look forward to it, however, as I expect I will be unfamiliar with most entries and I would like to be know more about them (again, just on principal).
Posted by: Edward Bussa | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 07:16 AM
In the true spirit of today's photography...
I AM the world's greatest photographer, and I'll spew my immense output all over the entire web.
Posted by: Luke | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 07:19 AM
Ray McSavaney, Ernst Haas and Paul Caponigro should be on the list along with a father/son duo of Edward and Brett Weston. Cartier-Bresson and Sally Mann as well.
Posted by: Jim | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 07:22 AM
I never even owned a camera until 1999 so I should really walk this, but the only books I own from photographers that meet your criteria are by Alec Soth & Mark Steinmetz.
Nothing by Christopher Anderson. No work by Amy Stein. My collection of photography books don't really reflect the time I am living in, so any top ten I'd give you now would not reflect whats on my bookshelf, so I feel unable to.
Maybe I should forgo the new Harry Callahan
book
Posted by: Sean | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 07:24 AM
on of my favorites is Hedi Slimane. his fashion diary is pretty good.
http://www.hedislimane.com/
Posted by: Eddi | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 07:50 AM
I'm game for a lil' gauntlet chucking; I nominate John Lok of the Seattle Times. Best all-around photographer of the digital age.
Posted by: Nate | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 08:43 AM
Photography has a real problem with this sort of list, since the standards for and ideas of what constitutes "good" are so broad and fluid. It's a bit like asking for the 10 greatest musicians, I think.
It's still probably fun to take a crack at it!
Posted by: Andrew Molitor | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 09:01 AM
I have five I would suggest. I have others I personally also really like, but I don't think they are good enough for a list of the greatest.
So in no particular order here are my five.
Polly Chandler
http://www.pollychandler.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/polly_chandler/
Joey Lawrence
http://www.joeyl.com/blog/
Ian Ruhter
http://www.ianruhter.com/
Lauren Simonutti
http://lauren-rabbit.blogspot.ca/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurensimonutti/
Dave Hill
http://www.davehillphoto.com/
Posted by: Greg Roberts | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 09:14 AM
Tim Hetherington. A little obvious and sentimental maybe but I do like his work. shrug..
Posted by: Steve Ducharme | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 09:43 AM
Well I don't know who is the "greatest" photographer. But I know a large reason for why i began photographing was seeing some of Kirsten Kleins photos in more or less randomly in a museum.
Posted by: christian lund | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 09:53 AM
My list avoids North American photographers, not because they aren't worth mentioning, but because others will and I would like to bring a little "outlying edge" to the lists.
In no particular order, and on a different day I could have made a different list, but at least six would have stayed. It also represents what I see on gallery walls, and is China and Australasia centric as they are where I spend most of my time.
Rong Rong and Inri
http://www.threeshadows.cn/en/artist_archives_Rong&inri.html
Leung Chi Wo
http://www.leungchiwo.com/
Ben Cauchi
http://bencauchi.com/
Fiona Pardington
http://tworooms.co.nz/artists/fiona-pardington/
Tracey Moffatt
http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au/collection/works/?artist_id=moffatt-tracey
Yang Yongliang
http://www.yangyongliang.com/
Wang Qingsong
http://www.yangyongliang.com/
Liu Zheng
http://www.pekinfinearts.com/artists/artists.php?id=16
Hamish Tocher
www.hamishtocher.co.nz
Andrew Ross
http://photospacegallery.weebly.com/andrew-ross---photos.html
Posted by: David Boyce | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 10:30 AM
Larry Burrows, because even in the middle of war he could make a tableau like a Renaissance painting.
Don McCullin, because he makes everything seem immediate and real
Henri Cartier-Bresson, because he translates 3D to 3D more intuitively than anyone else I can think of.
Robert Maplethorpe, because of crystal-clear definition
Chris Killip, because I can feel the life he describes
Sebastiao Salgado because, because
Werner Bischof, always top of my list because he sees the positive and the poetry in everything.
If that's not 10, I must have forgotten some.
[None of those folks qualify here. You must read the post a bit more carefully...or just read it.... —Mike]
Posted by: David Bennett | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 10:34 AM
At the expense of repeating my comment about poets, it's a bit like picking the 10 best pebbles off the beach. "Greatest" can only ever be an opinion, even if it's a majority opinion. "Most popular", "Most well-known" might be better categories
Posted by: Richard Tugwell | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 10:48 AM
"You didn't actually read this post, did you?"
Not well enough. Was hoping you wouldn't publish my comment after reading OP again. Anyway Folks should check out Marc Adamus. His landscapes are about as good as it gets.
[No offense meant Mike! You are a good friend of TOP and one of our best commenters. And I remain grateful for those kitchen plans, even though I have done nothing about them. —Mike]
Posted by: MJFerron | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:10 AM
I'm just waiting for Sarge to sort through all this and put some graphs up.
Posted by: John Krumm | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:11 AM
Not even heard of before 1995? How do you tell?
Some of these arguably don't meet the criteria for the list, but oh well.
Alec Soth
Vivian Maier
Mark Steinmetz
Jason Eskenazi
Rinko Kawauchi
Taryn Simon
Geert van Kesteren
Lise Sarfati
Rineke Dijkstra
Juergen Teller
More iffy for whatever reason, but still worth mentioning:
Edward Burtynsky
Saul Leiter
Hiromix
Ryan McGinley
David Bellemere
Richard Billingham
Andreas Gursky
Uta Barth
Posted by: R. A. Sasayama | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:17 AM
If you rule out (as is fair for this exercise) those who have had multiple third-party-published books, those who've had museum shows, and those who were familiar before 1995 . . . I'll bet most of your readers won't recognize more than 3 or 4 names on any "10" list that gets compiled. Quite a difference from a "Greatest Of All Time" list!
For me instant disqualifiers would be a high profile in self-driven "social media" and personal websites that are written in the third person and/or make claims about being one of the world's foremost photographers (those latter two often go together, the photographer presumably being too modest to make such claims himself).
If your photos aren't persuasive, no words or "buzz" will compensate for it.
Posted by: MM | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:19 AM
Michael Ackerman
Susan S Bank
Martin Bogren
Jason Eskenazi
Joakim Eskildsen
Claire Martin
Mark Steinmetz
Kim Thue
Oleg Videnin
Vanessa Winship
Posted by: Guy Batey | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:25 AM
"[None of those folks qualify here. You must read the post a bit more carefully...or just read it.... —Mike]"
Amusing.
An obvious but boring choice is Alec Soth. Others on my list include Jonas Bendiksen, Simon Roberts and Zoe Strauss.
Posted by: Andrew | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:25 AM
... forgot Rob Hornstra.
Posted by: Andrew | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:27 AM
I think Jeff Wall is the most interesting photographer working today.
Posted by: John Camp | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:47 AM
here is a compilation of "30 under 30" female photographers:
http://photoboite.com/3030/
enjoy!
Posted by: Freddy S. | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:52 AM
NOTA!
(None Of The Above -- Should be an option on every ballot for elected officials.
Posted by: Bill | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:57 AM
I have no idea.
Post 1995, what photographers impress me? I mean, enough to make me try and do what they do.
I started photographing because of moonlight, not because I saw somebody's print or thought that cameras were a neat thing. Yes, I've bought one of the Vivian Maier books and saw an exhibition of her photographs when it came through town, and I regard it as something like, "Oh, someone who compulsively did what I compulsively do."
I don't think that putting Maier on your list is cheating. Anybody like that would only come to light when they die. Otherwise, you are not simply looking for good photography, you are looking for someone who is already in the commercial or art/museum/gallery world. An "ahrteest."
Gursky? No.
Crewdson? No.
Sloth? No.
Nobody who uses simple resolution to impress the viewer.
Here's a good question: has anybody mastered photography?
Posted by: Brian Miller | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 12:32 PM
I'm glad Greg Roberts nominated Lauren Simonutti; She was the first one who came to my mind.
http://www.edelmangallery.com/simonutti/simonutti-main.htm
Though she was an exclusively large-format film photographer, she was definitely "post-internet". Because of her specific circumstances, most of her interactions with fans and customers was through the web. I have two of her books; they're remarkable.
I'd also put forward Scott Schuman ("The Sartorialist") as a candidate
http://www.thesartorialist.com/
I'm not much of a street fan, but Brad Evans has been doing very interesting work documenting the streets of San Francisco for quite a while now.
http://www.citysnaps.net/
And I'm a big fan of David Burnett, who makes all kinds of media work for him in all kinds of contexts.
http://www.davidburnett.com/
Posted by: Bob Blakley | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 12:46 PM
Oh, oh, oh... I almost forgot!
Tommy Oshima!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tommyoshima
Posted by: Bob Blakley | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 12:47 PM
Maybe not the greatest, nor an entire list, but these are a few British (I'm parochial...) photographers who keep me looking at their work:
http://www.davidchancellor.com/docs/home.php
http://jamesmorris.info/
http://www.crossing-paths.co.uk/
http://www.paulrussell.info/
I'd also suggest Rhodri Jones whose website my anti-virus stuff keeps flagging up as dodgy.
http://www.rhodrijones.com/
Posted by: Dave | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 12:51 PM
Impossible to get this right... too many fine photographers to choose from. And there are many that are 'tweeners'... they span the pre- and post-digital advent. But here are some of my favorites; I suspect most of these would remain on my 10-best list even if I gave the task more thought.
Alex Majoli
Susan Meiselas
Daido Moriyama
Sally Mann
Annie Liebovitz
Michael Kenna
Andreas Gursky
William Clift
Keith Carter
Mark Klett
Posted by: Jamie Pillers | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 01:55 PM
Loretta Lux
Posted by: John Willard | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 01:58 PM
My Fav. are:
Rinko Kawauchi
Liu Zheng
Vanessa Winship
viviane sassen
Doug Rickard
rafal milach
micheal wolf
cuny jassen
malick sidibe
roger ballen
Posted by: Barrie | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 02:28 PM
Looking through the first 70 comments there are three I know, Camus Wyatt, Michael Kenna and Alex Wild.
Two that I like are Joel Tjintjelaar for B&W architecture;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tjintjelaar/4301025737/in/photostream/
and Rosie Hardy;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rosie_hardy/3081970681/in/photostream/
for people/fashion. A little heavy maybe on photoshop for some tastes but it's been interesting following her the last few years.
It will be interesting to look up some of the other people mentioned, especially through our own national filters (ie. American migrant photos don't resonate with me the same way British agriculture photos do).
Posted by: Another Phil | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 02:29 PM
Oops,
In that case, Mike
Tristan Campbell
http://www.tristancampbell.co.uk/portfolio/trees-woodlands/
Peter Kool
http://www.peterkool.be/10.Gallery-I/content/134_nov12_large.html
Posted by: David Bennett | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 02:54 PM
He’s not been on any list yet, bit someone who’s had an enormous impact on (commercial and fashion) photography is Helmut Newton. We were recently in Berlin for a (chilly) week’s cultural and culinary battery charging (most successful) and spent most of an afternoon in the Helmut Newton museum. Some of it is so so, but a few of his images are burned into the bit of the head behind my retina... His reputation is mixed, a lot of his work is ‘strictly commercial’, but there are images that are simply mind b*ggering, especially seen 10 feet tall. And despite brilliant technique, he didn't apparently give a crap about cameras -- whatever got the job done, judging from the pile of stuff he left behind (including paired Canon EOS 100's, one labelled CNEG with masking tape, the other B&W.
What made him so heart-warmingly human and so endearing to me was the scrawled letter to Schröder, the then German Chancellor, apologising for having turned up a day too late for his dinner in his own honour with the same due to “an error in his diary”. He quoted the guard at the chancellery turning him away and refusing to let him park with the remark “that was yesterday evening, sir”. Priceless!
Posted by: Murray Davidson | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 04:56 PM
David Boyce's post had a bad link for Wang Qingsong. I saw Wang's work at the International Center of Photography last year in New York City. Very interesting, high concept art stuff.
The prints were 6 foot tall and 20 foot wide and tacked to the wall with push pins. I assume those prints went in the garbage after the show was over....
Posted by: Tom V | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 05:43 PM
Mike, this is tough because there are so many names that can be added to this list. My choices, and there are only 6 were as follows:
Ragnar Axelsson- Nordic photographer his books is called "Faces of the North" a masterpiece. Anyone traveling to Iceland will know his work.
Sebastio Salgado
Tim Heatherington-
Peter Turnley-
Danny Wilcox Fraser-Rural migration Very important work about the state of Rural America.
Sam Abell- A great teacher and very inspiring
Posted by: Albert Erickson | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 06:08 PM
A similar story to Vivian Maier, but he is still alive and I think he has started using digital. Fred Herzog of Vancouver has been documenting life in that city since he moved there in the 50s. However, his work was only discovered in recent years. His Kodakchrome street photos will keep most people captivated for hours on end.
Posted by: Peter | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 06:43 PM
Where to start indeed. In the spirit of the call for photographers of the Internet Age, I'll suggest some great photobloggers:
Joseph O. Holmes of Joe's NYC, a wonderful street photographer and great all rounder too.
http://streetnine.com/blog/
Kip Praslowicz, a young but thoroughly old-school photographer who adapts all kinds of equipment (press camera, infrared flash) to his purposes.
http://www.kpraslowicz.com/
Sharon Wish, who blurs street photography and fine art photography to capture something more than just her beloved, rainy city (Vancouver).
http://500px.com/bluechameleon
Heather Champ, the grande dame of photoblogging. Also a lo-fi / film junkie. Not sure where to find her work these days; she recently removed her stuff from Flickr.
http://hchamp.com/about.html
There are so many great photographers out there now thanks to the digital/Internet revolution. As much as I love lists, I think the 'Net has made a Top 10 list meaningless. Perhaps the 'Top 10 Photo Sharing Communities' is more germane.
Posted by: Jeff Hohner | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 09:14 PM
Mike, this post turned out to be wonderful. I have hours of inspirational web surfing ahead of me because of all the wonderful work people shared in the comments.
The bad news is that the post is also already costing me money, but hopefully making you a few bucks. I promise I'll go through your site for all the book orders.
Posted by: Bernd Reinhardt | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 09:26 PM
Mitch Dobrowner
Beth Moon
Posted by: Mark | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 10:14 PM
Hiroshi Sugimoto
Posted by: Mark Steigelman | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 10:37 PM
So that's odd. My first comment got eaten by the system but my second got through. My first one said YES! to Greg Roberts' nomination of Lauren Simonutti, and added (among others, but I forgot who) Scott Schuman, also known as The Sartorialist:
http://www.thesartorialist.com/
Posted by: Bob Blakley | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:14 PM
I wish to thank all those who contributed for the interesting list. I will do my best to work my way through it all...
In the meantime I have the most profound admiration for the following gentleman:
http://www.nuribilgeceylan.com/photography/turkeycinemascope1.php?sid=1
So far, nothing I have come across has had the same impact on me... but this is all very subjective, right?
Posted by: Steve Jacob | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:29 PM
In no particular order:
Alec Soth
Taryn Simon
Kayo Ume
shinya arimoto
Posted by: Jim Mooney | Friday, 26 April 2013 at 11:41 PM