Apparently a number of citizens of the State of Texas would like to secede from the United States following the re-election of President Obama.
For once, I side with the most rabid of right-wingers: I say, let's let 'em.
Please?
It's not that I dislike Texans, mind you. I like every Texan I've personally ever met. It's just that I would really be interested in watching this happen. I think it could be tremendously entertaining.
Presumably they would make do with their current State Constitution for a while, but why wouldn't they write a whole new Constitution? They could. They could change the whole government if they wanted to. Even the type of government. Just the arguments over all that could keep us entertained for years.
They'd even be free to rename the new country (Conservatopia?)—although admittedly "The Republic of Texas" has a certain majesty to it. Let's face it, Texas is a great name.
Guns would be legal, or maybe mandatory, but would they have an army? A draft? For sure they'd only have one political party. The Ten Commandments would be on every courthouse lawn, no doubt, but would they actually write Old Testament injunctions into their new laws? Those tend to get dicey when it actually comes down to specifics. To obey Leviticus or not to obey Leviticus? You can see how much fun this might be.
There would be a few disadvantages, of course. The map of the U.S. would look funny until we got used to it. College kids would need passports for spring break on South Padre Island. And all our flags would have to be changed.
Unless we just split California in two to make up for it. That could work.
The new country would be responsible for protecting its own stretch of the Rio Grande, which could get ugly. We'd have to protect our own borders with Texas, too, though, since, presumably, vans packed full of desperate Texas liberals and hippies from Austin would be trying to sneak back into the United States all the time.
Or would Oklahoma and Louisiana want to join the new country? How would Texas feel about that? "Well...."
On the good side, the Dallas Cowboys would no longer be America's Team. And, no more U.S. presidents from Texas. Works for me.
There would be some questions, of course. What about Federal installations and infrastructure, and their share of the national debt? I say they should pay us back. Well, at least partly. And they'd need all new treaties with all the rest of the world's countries and so forth. All the while trying to keep their government really, really small.
Some people worry that the new country wouldn't do very well. But it would be the 40th largest country on earth and have an economy larger than Australia's, according to what I've heard. They'd do fine. This is no reason not to let them go.
Really, this is something I'd like to see. Talk about political theater. Just think of it: the election for the presidency of Texas. Wouldn't you like to follow that? Best reality TV ever.
And who knows, maybe they'd come up with something better than what they've got now and we could all learn something from them. Could happen.
Anyway, Texans are petitioning for their independence, and, by rule, the White House owes them a response sometime around mid-December. I can synopsize it for you right now: it will say "Read the 14th Amendment, ya knuckleheads!" Only more politely, and with lots more words. (Article 1 basically says States can't deprive American citizens of their rights and privileges as American citizens.)
They're no fun.
Oh well.
Mike
ADDENDUM Monday morning: My feelings are a little hurt that this post set a record for traffic on a Sunday, for the whole seven years I've been doing this. Jeez, if so many people are going to come read something I write, couldn't it at least be something about photography? Sniff.
Secondly, of course I was just poking fun here. But if you're interested, the Wall Street Journal says there would be one particularly big upside and one equally big downside to secession for the states where the biggest petitions are coming from, in an article called "What seceding from the U.S. will cost you." I admit the upside is a biggie. Thanks to Paris for the link.
"Open Mike" is a series of off-topic ramblings that sometimes appears on Sundays.
Original contents copyright 2012 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
A book of interest today:
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
Ken White (partial comment): "Texas fought its own war of independence and made quite a good job of doing so. Many Texans take great pride in having been an independent country. It's interesting to live in Texas not having grown up here. It is a state of mind as much as a state within the union of the United States. It is a big place full of friendly people with big ideas who dream big dreams. Don't mess with Texas."
Marc Gibeault: "It's even more fun from here (Montreal)."
Stephen (partial comment): "As a native Texan, I would like to point out the following [...] around 117,000 people have signed their name in favor of this concept. According to a quick Google search, the state population is currently in the neighborhood of 25.6 million. This means that those 117k signatures represent less than half of a percent of Texas citizens. Again, less than 1/2 of 1%. (Assuming I did my math right. Which is always an assumption....)"
Mike replies: We're in bad shape if I'm the one who's supposed to be checking anybody's math.
MJFerron: "As one who lives in the Austin area I can assure you despite what one may read there is zero talk of secession of any kind in regular daily life. Nothing. It's just fluff and newspaper filler. Do I believe a state has the right to secede? Hmm, maybe under the right set of circumstances which I don't think exist at the moment."
John Camp: "I'd say that roughly half of the interesting people in the U.S. come from Texas. I'd include George Bush, who I found interesting: 'I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace.' Also, Kinky Friedman: 'Remember: Y'all is singular. All y'all is plural. All y'all's is plural possessive.' One of my Rules of Life was formulated while driving along I-40: 'Never order a chicken fried steak at a Holiday Inn in Amarillo, Texas.' As a new New Mexican, I'm proud to say that we threw Texans out of here on several occasions. Unlike Mike, I have met some Texans that I didn't like, but, I have to say, there weren't very many of those; they tend to be pretty likable, compared, say, to people from either major coast. What other state has an entire town devoted almost entirely to art (Marfa) or almost entirely to books (Archer City)?"
The best advice my Texican uncle ever gave me for visiting his state? "Don't ever let anyone here know you're not from Texas."
Posted by: B Grace | Monday, 26 November 2012 at 08:09 AM
If y'all are lucky, you might all be able secede from the UK.
Oh, wait. Just checked Wikipedia and it seems that may already have happened..
Posted by: Mark Hubbard | Monday, 26 November 2012 at 09:39 AM
Half the interesting people in Hollywood come from Canada. If John Camp is right about the other half coming from Texas, what are the rest of you contributing? :-)
Posted by: Tom Legrady | Monday, 26 November 2012 at 11:16 AM
Doesn't Canada have to put up with this nonsense regarding Quebec? Except that Quebec's population has come much closet to separation from Canada than Texas from the US. I had heard that the rest of Canada was just about ready to trade the US Quebec for Point Roberts....straight across trade too.
Posted by: John Robison | Monday, 26 November 2012 at 11:20 AM
Jabs at texas, a little bit of harmless fun, taken in good spirit. As an observation though, without Texas there'd be no Marine Corps, and the Army would be a shell of itself. For what it's worth.
Posted by: Charles Maclauchlan | Monday, 26 November 2012 at 11:29 AM
A lot of misconceptions about Quebec in these comments.
Posted by: Marc Gibeault | Monday, 26 November 2012 at 12:52 PM
Mike,
Don't feel bad. We all needed some comic relief re politics after the obscene political posturing and lies of the recent campaign. And you provived it. So of course readers responded. All that proves is that you have lots of 'participatory' readers. Note that your 'art' post got at least 68 responses.
Posted by: Richard Newman | Monday, 26 November 2012 at 02:48 PM
Mocking secessionists is not the same as mocking Texans.
Posted by: Ed | Tuesday, 27 November 2012 at 07:50 AM
http://rense.com/general68/secede.htm
[That's perfect. Symmetry. But of course they can't do it either. And, of course, neither Vermonters nor Texans want to secede from the U.S. Just a tiny band of extremists, crackpots and idealists there do. --Mike]
Posted by: Fred | Tuesday, 27 November 2012 at 04:53 PM
I was born and raised in Texas. The people are freindly (once you get away from any metropolitan center), courteous and polite to ladies. I have traveled all over this country and found people to be much the same all over(once you get away from metro centers). All politicians should serve no more than 3 terms, two in office and one in prison. As the world famous philosopher said, "life is like a box of chocolates," some politicians are crooked and other politicians are more crooked. LONG LIVE TEXAS.
Posted by: Victor Works | Wednesday, 28 November 2012 at 02:25 AM
Interestingly, there was a fair amount of noise in my home state of Vermont about secession during the GW Bush administration. Vermont was also once a proud, independent nation, and is about as much more progressive than the US as a whole as Texas is more conservative. Vermont is working on a single-payer health care system, was the first state with civil unions and one of the first with same-sex marriage. Our environmental laws are often considered the most progressive statewide laws in the nation (some regional laws go farther, such as the smart growth districts in Portland, OR). Our congressional delegations is composed of two liberal Democrats and democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders. The Republican Party is in danger of becoming a third party in the Vermont Legislature, behind not only the Democrats, but the Progressives as well. Basically, Vermont politics would be relatively typical in northern Europe, and most of us like it that way (just as most Texans like their state's conservative bent).
The interesting challenge for US politics to meet in the next few decades is to come up with a set of leaders who are relatively acceptable to a large fraction of the population in both Vermont and Texas - I'm not sure it's possible, and, if it's not, I wonder if the US has become ungovernable, and we should look at separating into several smaller countries (with friendly relations and open borders). Most of New England (and New York) isn't far from Vermont on many issues, the West Coast contains another liberal enclave, while the South and Southwest tend to be very conservative. Is there anything wrong with the idea of five to ten countries that would not be squabbling as much because each one had a somewhat narrower political "range"?
Posted by: Dan Wells | Friday, 07 December 2012 at 01:38 AM