Perhaps this will indicate just how circuitous my thought process can be sometimes. Writing the previous article summary about the twice-lost Cartier-Bresson prints sent me off looking for an illustration for it. Most of my illustration ideas come from my head, and I thought of John Loengard's excellent portrait of Henri Cartier-Bresson in old age, so I went off looking for that. I couldn't find one I could use (the only one I found has a disfiguring watermark on it), but, in the process of searching, I discovered that John's fine book As I See It
is still in print. (Here's the U.K. link
.)
Considering how fast many photography books seem to go out of print these days, I'm always surprised to find that good ones published in years past are still available. This was published way back in 2005. Four years is a middlin'-long lifespan for a book these days.
As a photographer, John Loengard was like a golfer who never went to Q-School* or played a mini-tour—he became a LIFE magazine photographer when he was still in college. Later, he was the picture editor for the monthly incarnation of LIFE, from 1978 to 1987.
Many of his books are more about LIFE magazine and other photographers than they are about him, like the excellent and entertaining collection of early-'90s interviews with former LIFE photographers, What They Saw. His "must-have" book in my opinion is Pictures Under Discussion
, which pairs photographs with short essays in the manner of Szarkowski's Looking at Photographs
(speaking of which, you do have that one by now, don't you? If you don't, chop chop). But both those books of Loengard's are out of print. As I See It is a retrospective monograph of his own photographs. Although John Loengard's contributions to photography have been multifaceted and not limited to his own work, his pictures are underrated. They're very fine, as well as being interesting and entertaining to look at because of their subjects (he's especially good with portraits of other photographers, for instance. Which I guess is where I started here).
*There are only a handful of golfers who have never had to run the gauntlet of Q-School to qualify for the tour. Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson, a few champions from other countries, and a scant few others. Even Tom Watson went through Q-School—once.
Featured Comment by Mike Peters: "When Pictures Under Discussion first came out, I pored over it for months, reading and re-reading. The book was quite illuminating for a young photographer.
"One day, I decided that I should show my work to John Loengard himself, secretly hoping he would see the work of a budding genius, or maybe just provide me with a nugget of advice or inspiration.
"So, I called the offices of LIFE and asked for his extension. Astonishingly, he answered the phone and gave me an appointment. I was on cloud nine, knowing that this would be my break. So, I prepared my portfolio, making the best prints of my best work.
"On the appointed day, I made my way to LIFE from my home in N.J. And there I was, in same hallways where the giants of 20th century photojournalism once and still roamed. We sat down and he pored over my work, inspecting, tossing aside, looking again. Finally the moment came where he had something to say, I sat forward, my heart leaping out of my chest.
"He leaned back and told me that my pictures were boring. He may have said other things after that, but my mind was stuck on boring. Dejectedly, I left, crushed, totally flattened, ready to quit photography.
"And now 25 years later, I realized that I was boring, even to myself, and my photos reflected who I was. When I was in my 20s I should have been living life to the fullest, doing interesting and crazy things, taking chances. Instead, I lived a life full of fear and negativity. Well, duh, that's what was in my photos.
"Thank you John Loengard for being honest with me, and giving me that nugget of truth.
"My copy of Pictures Under Discussion continues to give insight to all who experience it. I pass that book around to all of my friends who become interested in photography, and each person wants to read and re-read it just as I did. It has become well worn, but it's capacity to inspire is undiminished by time or technology."
Another fine Loengard book is Celebrating the negative. It is a collection of his photographs of the negatives of iconic images: Cartier-Bresson's Behind theGare St. Lazare, Kertesz's Satiric dancer and Walker Evan's Photographers Window Display are three examples. Studying the original negatives in this book makes a potent lesson in photography. It's always been a favorite of mine.
Rob Atkins
robatkins.com
Posted by: Rob Atkins | Saturday, 11 July 2009 at 01:41 PM
I also enjoy Loengard's book "Celebrating the Negative," in which he photographs and tells stories about the negs behind many well known prints.
Jeff
Posted by: Jeff | Saturday, 11 July 2009 at 02:16 PM
Two small typos, "of played a mini-tour" the "of" should be "or" I think. In the footnote, "run the gamut," I think you mean "run the gauntlet."
No need to publish this comment :-)
Posted by: Douglas Urner | Saturday, 11 July 2009 at 06:37 PM
Here is a cool link that you may enjoy since Jeff and Rob mentioned "Celebrating The Negative".
http://www.ethertongallery.com/html/specialprojects/negative/index.htm
I feel really fortunate to live near The Etherton Gallery.
Posted by: John Sartin | Saturday, 11 July 2009 at 06:39 PM
For the non-US non-golfers amongst us, could you (or anyone else, really) explain just what the %&*# 'Q-School' might be?
Thanks. :-)
Posted by: Julian | Sunday, 12 July 2009 at 02:59 AM
"could you (or anyone else, really) explain just what the %&*# 'Q-School' might be?"
Hi Julian,
It's the PGA Tour's Qualifying round. Basically, it's a 4-stage tournament where 1200+ hopefuls compete each year for 30 available slots on the PGA Tour, which is golf's Major League. Virtually everyone on the PGA Tour is treated like a rock star, and has access to huge piles of prize money. The Second Stage of Q School is also the way to get on the Nationwide Tour, which is like golf's minor leagues. Hmm, another American sports metaphor isn't going to do you any good, is it?...the Nationwide is a secondary professional golf tour with less prize money, for second-rank players, but it's a way to play full-time professional golf for a year. If I'm not mistaken, you can get a PGA Tour Card by being one of the top 20 money earners on the Nationwide Tour (with ties) or by being one of the top 30 finishers (with ties) in the First Stage of Q School. Some number of finishers in the Second Stage of Q School qualify for the following year's Nationwide Tour. I think. Don't quote me on that. And anyway the rules tend to change slightly from year to year.
To give you an idea how rich the PGA Tour is, you have to get all the way down to #190 on the 2008 money list (out of 262 players total) to get below a quarter of a million dollars in earnings. A whopping 104 players earned $1 million or more. And #190 most probably doesn't qualify for the Tour the next year (unless he won a tournament or earned an exemption in some other way). He has to go back to Q School to get back on the tour again. So Q School is extremely competitive, with a high entry fee and lots of contenders.
Naturally, each year in Q School you find young future stars on their way up competing with past Tour champions whose games have started to disintegrate, both alongside perennial hopefuls who play every year hoping to qualify for a year of pro golf on one of the two tours.
The First Stage of Q School (which actually determines who will go to the big tour) takes place after Thanksgiving every year, in early December, and I believe it's televised now, although I've never seen it.
John Feinstein, who wrote the classic golf book "A Good Walk Spoiled," also wrote a book called "Tales from Q School: Inside Golf's Fifth Major."
I hope someone will correct me if I've got any of the above facts wrong. I'm a very occasional golfer and only a casual fan.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Sunday, 12 July 2009 at 05:30 AM
I've got the title in question; picked it up in Borders when it was new out. It's full of good stuff. But I still want to see something about Philip Perkiss here :-)
Posted by: Tom Fenwick | Sunday, 12 July 2009 at 07:35 AM
Another good Loengard title is "Classic Photographs, A Personal Interpretation," which features iconic work from the pages of Life Magazine, along with short essays on each. I found my copy at a little bookshop for five bucks and thumb through it regularly.
Posted by: Doug Brewer | Sunday, 12 July 2009 at 10:33 AM
Speaking of golf, I regularly shoot in the low 70's*, and have never made a dime at it.
Jeff
*If it gets any hotter, I won't venture out. (sorry)
Posted by: Jeff | Sunday, 12 July 2009 at 12:25 PM
Ordered his Pictures Under Discussion (found in used book market). Thanks for the suggestion. In a similar vein I'd like to suggest Pat Booth's Master Photographers (recently acquired a copy thru Craigslist). She passed away earlier this year at age 66, but had quite a life including model, photographer and novelist. The book contains interviews with 16 photographers discussing their favorite prints.
Posted by: Doug Howk | Monday, 13 July 2009 at 07:50 AM
John,
Thanks for the link! I thoroughly enjoyed that, except for the fact that it made me wish I had a copy of "Celebrating the Negative" myself. I hope Mike posts the link on the main page.
Three cheers for the Internets!
Best,
Adam
Posted by: mcananeya | Monday, 13 July 2009 at 12:01 PM
Thanks, Mike. Ermmm, I think....
:-)
Posted by: Julian | Wednesday, 15 July 2009 at 06:00 AM