The latest from the rumor mill. Emphasis on "rumor." You think Photokina's over yet? But hey, 30x45mm—now that would be "full frame"! If it's true, this is going to separate the eye surgeons from the dentists, baby.
_____________________
Mike
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
It's real. Mike, love your surgeon-dentist comparison! So the M8 becomes a dentist only cam then?
Hi Mike, as someone who has no idea of medium format systems, can you please put this news in context? I mean, how important or significant is this development? Does it matter (compared to the big two)? Will it be affordable etc etc.
I'm glad to see Leica doing -something- new...and I'm apparently not alone. The Leica fan site is overwhelmed. The crowds there are so starved for anything new they were beginning to watch reruns of the M8 announcement and convincing each other that the M8.2 is really "new".
Admittedly I know no more details on this S2 than are in that magazine article. I hope I'm wrong but I just don't see Leica being successful with such a camera. The market for medium-format digital (which is basically what this is) is already quite busy and saturated with excellent products. Sinar, Mamiya, Phase One, Hassy have all been jostling at this relatively small trough for quite some time with established camera/back and lens systems. They've also established their beachheads with the big rental shops, which is key to this market. Leica comes in with nothing established, with a new camera system not compatible with anything, and will certainly be asking some preposterous prices for this kit.
So I guess I see yet another flop, rather like their R-system.
So it's time to cash in the IRA, empty the high-yield bank account, raid the college fund, sell the cars, rent out the kids and mortgage the house.
Then use the proceeds to plan and finance a huge heist on the Federal Reserve that will give you just about enough money to buy the S2 with the cheapest lens in the line-up.
I am *SO* excited, Mike. [wipes sarcasm from keyboard]
Remember my dentist with the H3DII? He's ticked he didn't wait.
Frankly this is pretty smart for Leica to do. If people are inventing new size formats a la micro 4/3 why not go bigger? I don't think too many eye surgeons are going to buy it, but outdoor fashion, architectural, and landscape pros who wanted a little weather protection and portability can justify the price of 20,000 euros, if they are based in Europe (the dollar having tanked today).
Medium format cameras have excellent image quality, but they are slow, clumsy, and expensive. If this camera is cheaper than the cheapest Hasselblad (£10,000 including standard lens), then it will be important.
It only has to be in the same price range as the Fujiblad, even if the sensor is smaller it will still have advantages.... Leica may not get the user interface perfect but they can probably do better than Hasselblad, Leaf, Rollei, etc.
This is EXACTLY what Canon (or for that matter Nikon, Olympus, Pentax) should have produced to move the DSLR beyond the traditional confines of 35mm film. Sadly, because it's Leica, the system will be prohibitively expensive. Nor does Leica have the electronics R&D of say, Canon, so I wonder if they will be able to develop the full potential of the system.
Colin,
Two points: first, this is the first of what Leica says will be "many" products in the S-System; second, the sensor partner is Kodak, which, despite a spotty commercialization record, drove early DSLR development and owns more digital patents than Canon by a considerable margin. (Kodak makes money any time anyone buys any DSLR anywhere.) So all is not lost. Necessarily. [s]
It's real. Mike, love your surgeon-dentist comparison! So the M8 becomes a dentist only cam then?
Posted by: cb | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 02:56 PM
The article at least is real, I got the mag this morning.
It's also on Professional Photographer's site.
http://www.professionalphotographer.co.uk/professional-photographer-news/leica-s2
Talk about a surprise.
Posted by: Eolake Stobblehouse | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 03:05 PM
Plastic Surgeons
Posted by: charlie d | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 03:21 PM
Hopefully the price will not be too outrageous but reality says $20k or more.
Now if it is just 56% more than the 5D Mark II, then I would buy one.
Posted by: david | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 03:26 PM
April 1st isn't for another 6 months or so.
I'm guessing a full frame M shouldn't be hard to do after all.
Eric
Posted by: Eric Mac | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 03:29 PM
Gee, what happened to the S1 (S?)?
If the announcement of the camera is stunning, wait until the price is announced ...
Posted by: Bruce Appelbaum | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 03:34 PM
Um, April was 5 months ago.
Posted by: Dennis Allshouse | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 03:36 PM
Hi Mike, as someone who has no idea of medium format systems, can you please put this news in context? I mean, how important or significant is this development? Does it matter (compared to the big two)? Will it be affordable etc etc.
Posted by: Manish | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 03:39 PM
I'm glad to see Leica doing -something- new...and I'm apparently not alone. The Leica fan site is overwhelmed. The crowds there are so starved for anything new they were beginning to watch reruns of the M8 announcement and convincing each other that the M8.2 is really "new".
Admittedly I know no more details on this S2 than are in that magazine article. I hope I'm wrong but I just don't see Leica being successful with such a camera. The market for medium-format digital (which is basically what this is) is already quite busy and saturated with excellent products. Sinar, Mamiya, Phase One, Hassy have all been jostling at this relatively small trough for quite some time with established camera/back and lens systems. They've also established their beachheads with the big rental shops, which is key to this market. Leica comes in with nothing established, with a new camera system not compatible with anything, and will certainly be asking some preposterous prices for this kit.
So I guess I see yet another flop, rather like their R-system.
Posted by: Ken Tanaka | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 04:20 PM
So it's time to cash in the IRA, empty the high-yield bank account, raid the college fund, sell the cars, rent out the kids and mortgage the house.
Then use the proceeds to plan and finance a huge heist on the Federal Reserve that will give you just about enough money to buy the S2 with the cheapest lens in the line-up.
I am *SO* excited, Mike. [wipes sarcasm from keyboard]
Posted by: Miserere | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 04:22 PM
Remember my dentist with the H3DII? He's ticked he didn't wait.
Frankly this is pretty smart for Leica to do. If people are inventing new size formats a la micro 4/3 why not go bigger? I don't think too many eye surgeons are going to buy it, but outdoor fashion, architectural, and landscape pros who wanted a little weather protection and portability can justify the price of 20,000 euros, if they are based in Europe (the dollar having tanked today).
Posted by: Jack | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 04:23 PM
It's going to be about $30,000 US for the body.
Posted by: phule | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 04:46 PM
Only 7 buttons/dials beside the shutter button... That is so.... Zen!
Posted by: jonr | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 04:46 PM
"Now if it is just 56% more than the 5D Mark II, then I would buy one."
LOL!
Well said.
Me too! This camera makes sense.
Posted by: Eolake Stobblehouse | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 04:59 PM
Oooh, shiny.
If you can score one of those, I'll be happy to review it, Mike [VUG]*
Odds of me ever buying one are about like that of buying a P65 back. Not in my income bracket, ever; not even close.
Still, soooo shiny.....
pax / Ctein
*Very Unlikely Grin
Posted by: Ctein | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 04:59 PM
Medium format cameras have excellent image quality, but they are slow, clumsy, and expensive. If this camera is cheaper than the cheapest Hasselblad (£10,000 including standard lens), then it will be important.
Posted by: Eolake Stobblehouse | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 05:01 PM
Look at the size of that eyepiece.....
Posted by: Harry Lime | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 05:22 PM
It only has to be in the same price range as the Fujiblad, even if the sensor is smaller it will still have advantages.... Leica may not get the user interface perfect but they can probably do better than Hasselblad, Leaf, Rollei, etc.
Posted by: Frank Petronio | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 05:31 PM
British Journal of Photograph says 20,000 pounds range.
Posted by: Bill Hertha | Monday, 22 September 2008 at 05:42 PM
A digital Norita...
Posted by: Stan B. | Tuesday, 23 September 2008 at 03:07 AM
This is EXACTLY what Canon (or for that matter Nikon, Olympus, Pentax) should have produced to move the DSLR beyond the traditional confines of 35mm film. Sadly, because it's Leica, the system will be prohibitively expensive. Nor does Leica have the electronics R&D of say, Canon, so I wonder if they will be able to develop the full potential of the system.
This SHOULD have been the new 5Dii :(
Cheers,
Colin
Posted by: Colin Work | Tuesday, 23 September 2008 at 08:13 AM
Colin,
Two points: first, this is the first of what Leica says will be "many" products in the S-System; second, the sensor partner is Kodak, which, despite a spotty commercialization record, drove early DSLR development and owns more digital patents than Canon by a considerable margin. (Kodak makes money any time anyone buys any DSLR anywhere.) So all is not lost. Necessarily. [s]
Mike J.
Posted by: Mike J. | Tuesday, 23 September 2008 at 09:13 AM